Why perfect being theology?

Article

Abstract

I display the historical roots of perfect being theology in Greco-Roman philosophy, and the distinctive reasons for Christians to take up a version of this project. I also rebut a recent argument that perfect-being reasoning should lead one to atheism.

Keywords

God Perfect being theology Christianity Atheism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anselm. (1965). Proslogion (M. Charlesworth, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1941). Metaphysics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle (W. D. Ross, Trans.). NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Augustine. (1982). Eighty three different questions (D. Mosher, Trans.). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  4. Augustine (1994a). Christian Doctrine. In P. Schaff (Ed.), Nicene and post-nicene fathers (F. Shaw, Trans.), ser. 1, v. 2. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Augustine (1994) The Trinity. In: Schaff P. (eds) Nicene and post-nicene fathers. Hendrickson Publishers, Peabody, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Augustine. (1999). Retractions (M. Bogan, Trans.). Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boethius. (1969). The consolation of philosophy (V. E. Watt, Trans.). NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  8. Cicero. (1988). On the nature of the Gods. In B. Inwood & L. Gerson (Eds.), Hellenistic philosophy: Introductory readings (B. Inwood & L. Gerson, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  9. Hill D. (2005) Divinity and maximal greatness. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Leftow B. (2004) Anselm’s perfect being theology. In: Davies B., Leftow B. (eds) The Cambridge companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press, NY, pp 132–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maitzen S. (2005) Anselmian Atheism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70: 225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Origen. (1956). Letter to Gregory Thaumaturgos, tr. in The Ante-Nicene Fathers, v. IV. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  13. Pike N. (1969) Omnipotence and God’s ability to sin. American Philosophical Quarterly 6: 208–216Google Scholar
  14. Plato. (1992). Republic (G. M. A. Grube & C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  15. von Harnack, A. (1958). History of dogma (3rd ed., N. Buchanan, Trans.). NY: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oriel CollegeOxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations