Blinding me with (queer) science: religion, sexuality, and (post?) modernity

Abstract

This essay brings to bear insights from continental philosophers Michel Foucault and Judith Butler on the science of (homo)sexuality and, more importantly, the desire to use such science to resolve contemporary conflicts over homosexuality’s acceptability. So-called “queer science” remains deeply beholden to modern notions of sex, gender, and sexuality, the author argues, a schematic that its premodern (Christian) roots further denaturalize. The philosophical insights drawn from this analysis are then applied to the controversy over homosexuality within global Christianity that often pits the “backward” former colonies against the “modern” west.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Armour E. T. (1999) Deconstruction, feminist theology and the problem of difference: Subverting the race/gender divide. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armour E. T. (2010) Planetary sightings? Negotiating sexual differences in globalization’s shadow. In: Moore S., Rivera M. (eds) Planetary loves: Postcoloniality, gender and theology. Fordham University Press, New York, pp 209–224

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armour, E. T., St. Ville, S. M. (eds) (2006) Bodily citations: Judith Butler and religion. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boswell J. (1980) Christianity, social tolerance and homosexuality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boswell J. (1985) Same-sex unions in premodern Europe. Vintage Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brooten B. (1996) Love between women: Early Christian responses to female homoeroticism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge (10th anniversary edition 1999).

  8. Butler J. (2008) Sexual politics, torture, and sexual time. British Journal of Sociology 59(1): 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dreger, A. (2009) Science is forcing sports to reexamine their core principles. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/sports/13dreger.html.

  10. Fausto-Sterling A. (2000) Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Foucault M. (1984) What is enlightenment?. In: Rabinow P. (eds) The Foucault reader (C Porter, Trans.). Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Random House.

  13. Hamer D., Copeland P. (1994) The science of desire: The search for the gay gene and the biology of behavior. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hassett M. (2007) Anglican communion in crisis: How episcopal dissidents and their African allies are reshaping anglicanism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jordan M. D. (1997) The invention of sodomy in Christian theology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jordan M. D. (2002) The ethics of sex. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kolini, The most revd Emmanuel Mbona, et al. 31 January 1998. Available at http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~lcrew/rwanda.html. Accessed 10 July 2008.

  18. Kuefler, M. (eds) (2006) The Boswell thesis: Essays on Christianity, social tolerance and homosexuality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  19. LeVay S. (1996) Queer science: The use and abuse of research into homosexuality. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  20. Levy, A. (2009). Either/or: Sports, sex, and the case of Caster Semenya. The New Yorker, 30 November 2009. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/11/30/091130fa_fact_levy. Accessed 1 June 2010.

  21. Marus, R., & Warner, G. (2007). Mohler: Homosexuality likely genetic; Christians should support prenatal cure. 7 March 2007. http://www.abpnews.com/1855.article.

  22. Martin D. B. (2006) Sex and the single savior: Gender and sexuality in biblical interpretation. Westminster/John Knox Press, Louisville, KY

    Google Scholar 

  23. McWhorter L. (2009) Racism and sexual oppression in Anglo-America: A genealogy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nelkin D., Lindee M. S. (1995a) The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nelkin D., Lindee M. S. (1995b) The media-ted gene. In: Terry J., Urla J. (eds) Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 387–402

    Google Scholar 

  26. Roscoe W., Murray S. O. (2001) Boy-wives and female Husbands: Studies in African homosexualities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Saletan, W. (2008). Sexual reorientation: The gay culture war is about to turn chemical. Slate. http://www.slate.com/id/2193841/. 18 June 2008.

  28. Thomas, K. (2008). A lab is set to test the gender of some female athletes. The New York Times, 30 July 2008.

  29. Ward K. (2002) Same-sex relations in Africa and the debate on homosexuality in East African Anglicanism. Anglican Theological Review 83: 81–111

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen T. Armour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armour, E.T. Blinding me with (queer) science: religion, sexuality, and (post?) modernity. Int J Philos Relig 68, 107–119 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9246-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Homosexuality
  • Christianity
  • Post modernity