Blinding me with (queer) science: religion, sexuality, and (post?) modernity

Article

Abstract

This essay brings to bear insights from continental philosophers Michel Foucault and Judith Butler on the science of (homo)sexuality and, more importantly, the desire to use such science to resolve contemporary conflicts over homosexuality’s acceptability. So-called “queer science” remains deeply beholden to modern notions of sex, gender, and sexuality, the author argues, a schematic that its premodern (Christian) roots further denaturalize. The philosophical insights drawn from this analysis are then applied to the controversy over homosexuality within global Christianity that often pits the “backward” former colonies against the “modern” west.

Keywords

Homosexuality Christianity Post modernity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armour E. T. (1999) Deconstruction, feminist theology and the problem of difference: Subverting the race/gender divide. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Armour E. T. (2010) Planetary sightings? Negotiating sexual differences in globalization’s shadow. In: Moore S., Rivera M. (eds) Planetary loves: Postcoloniality, gender and theology. Fordham University Press, New York, pp 209–224Google Scholar
  3. Armour, E. T., St. Ville, S. M. (eds) (2006) Bodily citations: Judith Butler and religion. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Boswell J. (1980) Christianity, social tolerance and homosexuality. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Boswell J. (1985) Same-sex unions in premodern Europe. Vintage Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooten B. (1996) Love between women: Early Christian responses to female homoeroticism. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge (10th anniversary edition 1999).Google Scholar
  8. Butler J. (2008) Sexual politics, torture, and sexual time. British Journal of Sociology 59(1): 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dreger, A. (2009) Science is forcing sports to reexamine their core principles. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/sports/13dreger.html.
  10. Fausto-Sterling A. (2000) Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Foucault M. (1984) What is enlightenment?. In: Rabinow P. (eds) The Foucault reader (C Porter, Trans.). Pantheon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Hamer D., Copeland P. (1994) The science of desire: The search for the gay gene and the biology of behavior. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassett M. (2007) Anglican communion in crisis: How episcopal dissidents and their African allies are reshaping anglicanism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  15. Jordan M. D. (1997) The invention of sodomy in Christian theology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Jordan M. D. (2002) The ethics of sex. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolini, The most revd Emmanuel Mbona, et al. 31 January 1998. Available at http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~lcrew/rwanda.html. Accessed 10 July 2008.
  18. Kuefler, M. (eds) (2006) The Boswell thesis: Essays on Christianity, social tolerance and homosexuality. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. LeVay S. (1996) Queer science: The use and abuse of research into homosexuality. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Levy, A. (2009). Either/or: Sports, sex, and the case of Caster Semenya. The New Yorker, 30 November 2009. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/11/30/091130fa_fact_levy. Accessed 1 June 2010.
  21. Marus, R., & Warner, G. (2007). Mohler: Homosexuality likely genetic; Christians should support prenatal cure. 7 March 2007. http://www.abpnews.com/1855.article.
  22. Martin D. B. (2006) Sex and the single savior: Gender and sexuality in biblical interpretation. Westminster/John Knox Press, Louisville, KYGoogle Scholar
  23. McWhorter L. (2009) Racism and sexual oppression in Anglo-America: A genealogy. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelkin D., Lindee M. S. (1995a) The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. W.H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelkin D., Lindee M. S. (1995b) The media-ted gene. In: Terry J., Urla J. (eds) Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 387–402Google Scholar
  26. Roscoe W., Murray S. O. (2001) Boy-wives and female Husbands: Studies in African homosexualities. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Saletan, W. (2008). Sexual reorientation: The gay culture war is about to turn chemical. Slate. http://www.slate.com/id/2193841/. 18 June 2008.
  28. Thomas, K. (2008). A lab is set to test the gender of some female athletes. The New York Times, 30 July 2008.Google Scholar
  29. Ward K. (2002) Same-sex relations in Africa and the debate on homosexuality in East African Anglicanism. Anglican Theological Review 83: 81–111Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Divinity SchoolVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations