Abstract
In this paper I challenge Merold Westphal’s claim that Jean-Luc Marion’s hermeneutical phenomenology is especially useful for theology. I argue that in spite of his explicit allegiance to Husserl’s “principle of all principles,” Marion fails to embody a commitment to phenomenological seeing in his analyses of revelation. In the sections of Being Given where he discusses revelation, Marion allows faith-based claims to bleed into his phenomenological analyses, resulting in what I call his ‘blurred vision’—the pretension that phenomenological seeing can be extended to theological matters. This pretension undermines Marion’s phenomenological aspirations, because it invests his analyses with a theological content that phenomenological intuition cannot account for or clarify. At the same time, this blurring of the line between theology and phenomenology also makes Marion’s work theologically ineffective. For it furnishes the theologian and believer with the false assurance that faith-based commitments can be grounded in phenomenological knowledge—a claim that he simply cannot make good on. In light of these problems, I propose an alternative Heideggerian approach that maintains the boundary between philosophical and theological discourse and thereby safeguards the integrity of both.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bossche S. (2001) God does appear in immanence after all: Jean-Luc Marion’s Phenomenology as New First Philosophy for Theology. In: Boeve L., Leijssen L. (eds) Sacramental presence in a postmodern contex. Leuven University Press, Leuven, pp 325–347
Burch M. I. (2009) The twinkling of an eye: Kierkegaard and Heidegger on the possibility of faith. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83(2): 219–238
Crowell S. G. (2002) Authentic thinking and phenomenological method. In: Hopkins B., Crowell S. G. (eds) The new yearbook for phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. Noesis Press, Seattle
Dahlstrom D. (1994). Heidegger’s method: Philosophical concepts as formal indications. The Review of Metaphysics, 47(4): 188, 775–797
De Vries H. (1998) Formal indications. MLN 113(3): 635–688 (German Issue)
Gadamer H.-G. (1987) Die Religiose Dimension in Gesammelte Werke Band 3: Neuerer Philosophie I Hegel, Husserl, Heidegger. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Heidegger M. (1998) Phenomenology and theology. In: McNeill W. (eds) Pathmarks. Cambridge University Press, New York
Heidegger, M. (2001). Phenomenological interpretations of Aristotle (R. Rojcewicz, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book (F. Kersten, Trans.). Dodrecht: Kluwer.
Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations (J. N. Findlay, Trans.). New York: Routledge.
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding unscientific postscript to the philosophical fragments (H. V. Hong & E. H. Hong, Eds., Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kuhlmann G. (1929) Zum theologischen Problem der Existenz (Frage an R. Bultmann). Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 10(1): 28–55
Levinas, E. (1987a). Freedom and command. In Collected papers (A. Lingis, Trans.). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Levinas, E. (1987b). The ego and the totality. In Collected Papers (A. Lingis, Trans.). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Levinas, E. (1987c). Philosophy and the idea of infinity. In Collected Papers (A. Lingis, Trans.). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Levinas, E. (2000). A god “Transcendent” to the point of absence in God, death, and time (B. Bergo, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Marion J.-L. (1998) Metaphysics and phenomenology: A summary for theologians. In: Ward G. (eds) The postmodern God; a theological reader. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
Marion, J.-L. (2000). The saturated phenomenon. In D. Janicaud (Ed.), Phenomenology and the theological turn: The French debate (B. G. Prusak, Trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.
Marion J.-L. (2002a) They recognized him; And he became invisible to them in. Modern Theology 18: 145–152
Marion J.-L. (2002b) Being given: Toward a phenomenology of givenness. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Otto, R. (1969). The idea of the holy (J. W. Harvey, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sartre, J.-P. (1994). Being and nothingness (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). New York: Grammercy Books.
Westphal M. (2006) Vision and voice: Phenomenology and theology in the work of Jean-Luc Marion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60: 117–137
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burch, M.I. Blurred vision: Marion on the ‘possibility’ of revelation. Int J Philos Relig 67, 157–171 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9226-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9226-9