Abstract
While a considerable amount of effort has been expended in an attempt to understand Ludwig Wittgenstein’s enigmatic comments about silence and the mystical at the end of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, very little attention has been paid to the implications of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations for the study of ineffability. This paper first argues that, since Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations problematizes private language, emphasizes the description of actual language use, and recognizes the rule-governed nature of language, it contains significant implications for the study of ineffability, inviting investigations of the ways in which putative ineffability actually gets expressed rather than speculation about whether there are ineffable objects or experiences. It then undertakes such an investigation in the Dionysian corpus, finding therein not only grammatical techniques that express inexpressibility at the referential, illocutionary, and semiotic levels but also rules that underlie and govern these techniques. Finally, it shows how a recovery of the ordinary uses of ineffability might help dissolve the metaphysical problem of ineffability, thereby bringing ineffability back to the everyday.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett C. (1991). Wittgenstein on ethics and religious belief. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
Clack B. (1999). An introduction to Wittgenstein’s philosophy of religion. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
Crary A. and Read R. (eds). (2000). The new Wittgenstein. Routledge, New York
Forman R. (1999). Mysticism, mind, consciousness. State University of New York Press, Albany
Hacker P.M.S. (1990). Wittgenstein, meaning and mind: An analytical commentary on the philosophical investigations (Vol. 3). Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
Hume D. (1985). Dialogues concerning natural religion. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis
Hutchinson P. and Read R. (2006). An elucidatory interpretation of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A critique of Daniel D 6.54. Hutto’s and Marie McGinn’s reading of Tractatus. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14(1): 1–29
Lakoff G. and Johnson M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lakoff G. and Johnson M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. Basic Books, New York
Proudfoot W. (1985). Religious experience. University of California Press, New York
Pseudo-Dionysius. (1980). The divine names and mystical theology (J. Jones, Trans.). Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
Pseudo-Dionysius. (1987). Pseudo-Dionysius: The complete works (C. Luibheid, Trans.). Mahwah, New York: Paulist Press
Pseudo-Dionysius. (1990). In B. Regina (Ed.), Corpus Dionysiacum I: De Divinis Nominibus. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Pseudo-Dionysius. (1991). In G. Heil, & A. Ritter (Eds.), Corpus Dionysiacum II: De Coelesti Hierarchia, De Ecclesiastic Hierarchia, De Mystica Theologia, Epistulae. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Searle J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge University Press, New York
Searle J. and Vanderveken D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge University Press, New York
Sells M. (1994). Mystical languages of unsaying. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Stace W.T. (1960). Mysticism and philosophy. Macmillan Press, London
Wittgenstein L. (1993). A lecture on ethics. In: Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A. (eds) Philosophical occasions, 1912–1951, pp 36–44. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.) (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knepper, T.D. Ineffability investigations: what the later Wittgenstein has to offer to the study of ineffability. Int J Philos Relig 65, 65–76 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9178-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9178-5