Bartley, W. W. (1984). The retreat to commitment, (2nd ed., La Salle, IL: Open Court pp. 262–263).
Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: The Free Press, pp. 198–199, p. 205.
Coyne, J. (2005). The case against intelligent design: The faith that dare not speak its name—A review of Of Pandas and People by Percival Davis and Dean H. Kenyon. The New Republic, 22 August 2005, retrieved 28 August 2005 from http://www.tnr.com.
Darwin, C. (1968). The origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, 1st ed.  Pelican Classics Harmondsworth: Penguin (p. 219).
Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker. London: Penguin, 1988.
Dembski W.A. (1998). The design inference: Eliminating chance through small probabilities, Cambridge Studies in probability, induction, and decision theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Dembski, W. A. (2002a). No free lunch: Why specified complexity cannot be purchased without intelligence Langham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield (p. 162).
Dembski, W. A. (2002b). “Obsessively criticized but scarcely refuted: A response to Richard Wein”, retrieved on 28 August 2006 from http://www.designinference.com/documents/05.02.resp_to_wein.htm.
Fitelson B., Stephens C., Sober E. (1999). How not to detect design: A review of Wiliam A. Dembski’s The design inference—Eliminating chance through small probabilities. Philosophy of Science 66, 473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman J. (1992). Bayes or bust? A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory. MIT Press, A Bradford Book Cambridge, MA, (p. 101)Google Scholar
Elsberry, W. & Shallit, J. (2003). Information theory, evolutionary computation, and Dembski’s ‘complex specified information, pp. 25–31, retrieved on 28 August 2006 from http://www.antievolution.org/people/wre/papers/eandsdembski.pdf.
Gishlick, A., Matze, N. & Elsberry, W. R. (2004). Meyer’s Hopeless Monster—A review of Stephen C. Meyer, The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 117, 213–239, retrieved on 29 August 2006 from http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives, Conclusion.
Greenberg, D. (2005). Those bastards, we’ve got to cut them back—A review of The Republican War on Science
by Chris Mooney. London Review of Books, 27
(18), 17, 22 September.Google Scholar
Himma K.E. (2005). The application-conditions for design inferences: Why the design arguments need the help of other arguments for God’s existence. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57, 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman S.A. (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (pp. 22–25)Google Scholar
Kitcher P. (1996). Abusing science: The case against creationism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (p. 52)Google Scholar
Lipton P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Issues in Science London, Routledge, (pp. 59–60)Google Scholar
Lycan, W. G. (1988). Judgement and justification, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 112 et passim.
Meyer S.C. (2004). The return of the God hypothesis. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 11, 24–27Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1999). Three Essays on Religion. . In J. M. Robson (Ed.), Collected works of John Stuart Mill Vol. 10 University of Toronto Press (p. 447).
Meyer, S. C. (2004). The Cambrian information explosion: Evidence for intelligent design. In W. A. Dembski & M. Ruse (Ed.), Debating Design Cambridge University Press (p. 371).
Pine, R. H. (2005). Intelligent design or ‘no model’ creationism: A total fraud and a scam why it can’t qualify as even a pseudoscience. Creation & Intelligent Design Watch hosted by the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), retrieved 22 November 2005 from http://www.csicop.org/intelligentdesignwatch/pine.html.
Popper, K. R. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery, , Routledge Classics. London: Routledge, 2002, §31 (96), §35 (103).
Saletan, W. (2005). The Brontosaurus: Monty Python’s flying creationism. Slate, posted Thursday, 27 October 2005; retrieved 28 August 2006 from http://www.slate.com/id/2128755/.
Sober E. (1999). Testability. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 73, 47–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober E. (2002). Intelligent design and probability reasoning. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52, 65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober E. (2003). The design argument. In: Manson N.A. (eds). God and design: The teleological argument and modern science. Routledge, London, pp. 27–54Google Scholar
Stenger, V. J. (2003). Messages from heaven. In Has science found god? Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, chap. 4.
Swinburne R. (2004). The existence of god. 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 341Google Scholar
van Till H.J. (1999). “Does ‘intelligent design’ have a chance? An essay review”. Zygon 34, 667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Till, H. J. (2002). E. Coli at the no free lunchroom: Bacterial flagella and Dembski’s case for intelligent design, 18, retrieved on 28 August 2006 from http://www.aaas.org/spp/dser/03_Areas/evolution/perspectives/vantillecoli_2002.pdf.