Apophasis and the turn of philosophy to religion: From Neoplatonic negative theology to postmodern negation of theology

Original Paper

Abstract

This essay represents part of an effort to rewrite the history metaphysics in terms of what philosophy never said, nor could say. It works from the Neoplatonic commentary tradition on Plato’s Parmenides as the matrix for a distinctively apophatic thinking that takes the truth of metaphysical doctrines as something other than anything that can be logically articulated. It focuses on Damascius in the 5–6th century AD as the culmination of this tradition in the ancient world and emphasizes that Neoplatonism represents the crisis of Greek metaphysics on account of the inability to give a rational account of foundations for knowing and of the ultimate principle of beings. Neoplatonism discovered how all such ultimate principles were necessarily beyond the reach of reason and speech. This apophatic insight is drawn out with the help of contemporary criticism of Neoplatonic philosophy, defining also some points of divergence. The essay then discusses the motives for thinking the unsayable in postmodern times on the basis of this parallel with Neoplatonic thought. Discourse’s becoming critical of itself to the point of self-subversion animates them both. However, the tendency in postmodern thought to totally reject theology, including negative theology, is a betrayal of its own deepest motivations. This tendency is debated through an examination of the thought of Jean-Luc Nancy. While any traditional discourse can be negated, the negating and self-negating capacity of discourse itself is infinite, and this is where a perennial negative theological philosophy of the unsayable is to be located. Language, eminently the language of philosophy, as infinitely open, points in a direction which becomes equally and ineluctably theological.

Keywords

Apophasis Negative theology Neoplatonism Postmodern thought Unsayable Metaphysics Parmenides Damascius Nancy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agamben, G. (2002). Idea Bella prosa. Macerata: Quodlibet, pp. 9–12.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, A. H. (1979). Plotinus’s doctrine of the infinite and its significance for christian thought. In Plotinian and christian studies, vol. 47. London: Varoriurn Reprints.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, A. H. (1979). Negative theology. In Plotinian and christian studies, p. XXIV: 178.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, A. H. (1979). The escape of the one: An investigation of some possibilities of apophatic theology imperfectly realised in the West. In Plotinian and christian studies, p. XXIIII: 87.Google Scholar
  5. Aubenque, P. (1971). Plotin et le dépassement de l’ontologie grecque classique. In P. Maxime Schuhl & P. Hadot (Eds.), Le Néopolatonisme, Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
  6. Benjamin, W. (1977) Über die Sprache überhaupt and über die Sprache des Menschen (1916). In Gesammelte Schriften. II, I (pp. 140–157). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, translated by Jephcott, E. (1978). On language as such and on the language of man. In Reflections: essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings (pp. 314–332). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  7. Blanchot, M. (1969). Comment découvrir l’obscur? In L’Entretien infini. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 57–69, translated by Hanson, S. (1993). How to discover the obscure? In The infinite conversation (pp. 40–48). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blanchot M. (1969). L ’Entretien infini. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Bulhof I.N., Laurens ten Kate ed. (2000). Flight of the Gods: Philosophical perspectives on negative theology. Fordham University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Caputo J.D., Scanlon M.J., Dooley M. ed. (2001). Questioning God. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Caputo J.D., Scanlon M.J. ed. (1999) God, the gift, and postmodernism. Indiana University Press, Bloomingtonp. 12Google Scholar
  12. Carlson T.A. (1999) Indiscretion: Finitude and the naming of God. University of Chicago Press, Chicago pp. 4–5Google Scholar
  13. Combés, J. (1996). La théologie aporétique de Damascius. In Études néoplatoniciennes, 2nd ed. rev., Grenoble: Jérome Millon Connor, P. (1991). Of divine places, In The inoperative community (pp. 110–125). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  14. Damascius (1966). Traité des Premiers Principes, vol. I: De L’Ineffable et de 1’Un, Leendert Gerrit Westerink (Ed.), translated by Combès, J. vol. I 21 (pp. 8–10) Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  15. Davies, O., & Turner, D. (Eds.) (2002) Silence and the word: Negative theology and incarnation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. Derrida, J (1993) Sauf le nom (pp. 15–21, 38–65). Paris: Galilée, translated as “Sauf le nom (Post-Scriptum)” in Derrida, J. (1995), Thomas Dutoit (Ed.), On the name. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Derrida, J., & Spire, A. (2002). Au-delà des apparences. Latresne, Bordeaux: Le Bord de 1’eau, p. 53.Google Scholar
  18. Dillon, J. M. (1997). Damascius on the ineffable. In The great tradition: Further studies in the development of platonism and early christianity. London: Variorum Editions.Google Scholar
  19. Franke, W. (forthcoming) On what cannot be said. Apophatic Discourses in philosophy, religion, literature, and the arts. Vol. I: Classic Formulations. Vol. II: Modern and Contemporary Transformations. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hadot P. (2002). Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Albin Michel, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Heiser, J. H. (1991). Plotinus and the Apeiron of Plato’s Parmenides. Thomist, 55, 80.Google Scholar
  22. Hent de Vries (1989). Theologie im Pianissimo: Zur Aktualitcit der Denlguren Adornos and Levinas. Kampen, Netherlands: J.H. Kok. English translation by Hale, G. (forthcoming). Minimal Theologies: Critiques of Secular Reason in Adorno and Levinas. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hent de Vries (1999). Philosophy and the turn to religion. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore p. 27Google Scholar
  24. Katz S. (1992). Mystical speech and mystical meaning. In: Katz S. (eds). Mysticism and language. Oxford University Press, New York, p. 33Google Scholar
  25. Kenney J.P. (1991). Mystical monotheism. University Press of New England, Hannover, New HampshireGoogle Scholar
  26. Kenney J.P. (1993). The critical value of negative theology. Harvard Theological Review 86, 439–553Google Scholar
  27. Levinas (1967). La Trace de l’Autre and Énigme et phénoméne. In En découvrant 1’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  28. Milbank J. (1977). The word made strange: theology, language, culture. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Nancy (2000) Corpus. Paris: Métailié.Google Scholar
  30. Nancy (2003) Noli me tangere: Essai sur la levée du corps. Bayard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  31. Nancy (2005). Déconstruction du christianisme, vol 1. Galilée, ParisGoogle Scholar
  32. Sara Rappe (2000) Reading neoplatonism. Non-discursive thinking in the texts of Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Scharlemann R.P. ed. (1992). Negation and theology. University Press of Virginia, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sells M. (1994). Mystical languages of unsaying. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 8Google Scholar
  35. Summerell O.F. ed. (1998). The otherness of God. University Press of Virginia, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor M.C. (1987) Altarity. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor M.C. (1990). Tears. Albany: SUNY Press, 1990, p. 106.Google Scholar
  38. Trouillard J. (August, 1961). Valeur critique de la mystique Plotinienne. Revue philosophique de Louvain 59, 431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner D. (1995). The darkness of God: Negativity in christian mysticism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 34Google Scholar
  40. Ward G. ed. (1997). The postmodern God: A theological reader. Blackwell, BostonGoogle Scholar
  41. Ward G. ed. (2001). The Blackwell companion to postmodern theology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Williams J.P. (2000). Denying divinity: Apophasis in the patristic christian and Soto Zen Buddhist traditions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 8Google Scholar
  43. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 6.522, translated by C. K. Ogden (1992) with introduction by Bertrand Russell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Comparative LiteratureThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.Departments of French and ItalianVandervilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations