American Airlines, Inc., v. Travelport Inc., Sabre, Inc., Sabre Holdings Inc., & Sabre Travel International Ltd. (2011–2013). United States District Court, Tarrant County, Texas. Case No. 67-249214-10.
Björnerstedt, J., & Verboven, F. (2016). Does merger simulation work? Evidence from the Swedish analgesics market. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(3), 125–164.
Carlton, D. W. (2007). Market definition: Use and abuse. Competition Policy International, 3(1), 3–27.
Carlton, D. W. (2009). Why we need to measure the effect of merger policy and how to do it. Competition Policy International, 5(1), 87–100.
Carlton, D. W. (2010). Revising the horizontal merger guidelines. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 6(3), 619–652.
Carlton, D. W. (2019). The anticompetitive effects of vertical most-favored-nation restraints and the Error of AMEX. Columbia Business Law Review, 2019(1), 93–106.
Carlton, D. W. (2020). Transaction Costs and Competition Policy. International Journal of Industrial Organization (in press).
Carlton, D. W., Coleman, M., & Israel, M. (2014). Buyer Power in Merger Review. In R. D. Blair & D. D. Sokol (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Antitrust Economics (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carlton, D. W., & Israel, M. (2010a). Response to Gopal Das Varma’s “Market definition, upward pricing pressure, and the role of courts: A response to Carlton and Israel.” Antitrust Source, 10(2), 1–5.
Carlton, D. W., & Israel, M. (2010b). Will the new guidelines clarify or obscure antitrust policy? Antitrust Source, 10(1), 1–4.
Carlton, D. W., & Israel, M. (2011). Proper treatment of buyer power in merger review. Review of Industrial Organization, 39(1/2), 127–136.
Carlton, D. W., & Keating, B. (2015a). Antitrust, transaction costs, and merger simulation with nonlinear pricing. The Journal of Law and Economics, 58(2), 269–289.
Carlton, D. W., & Keating, B. (2015b). Rethinking antitrust in the presence of transaction costs: Coasian implications. Review of Industrial Organization, 46, 307–321.
Carlton, D. W., & Perloff, J. M. (2005). Modern Industrial Organization (4th ed.). London: Pearson.
Carlton, D. W., & Sider, H. S. (1999). Market Power and Vertical Restraints in Retailing Private and An Analysis of FTC v. Toys ‘R’ Us. In D. J. Slottje (Eds.), The Role of the Academic Economist in Litigation Support. North Holland.
Carlton, D. W., & Winter, R. A. (2018). Vertical most-favored-nation restraints and credit card no-surcharge rules. The Journal of Law and Economics, 61(2), 215–251.
Chen, Y., & Schwartz, M. (2016). Churn vs. diversion: An illustrative model. Economica, 83(332), 564–583.
Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2019). The Role of Market Definition in Assessing Anti-Competitive Harm in Ohio v. American Express. Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle.
Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (2010a). Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: An economic alternative to market definition. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 10(1), Article 9.
Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (2010b). Upward pricing pressure and critical loss analysis: Reply to Epstein and Rubinfeld. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 10(1), Article 41.
Federal Trade Commission v. RAG-Stiftung et al., (Evonik) (2020). United States District Court, District of Columbia. Case No. 1:19-cv-02337-TJK. Opinion.
Fisher, F. M. (1984). The misuse of accounting rates of return: Reply. The American Economic Review, 74(3), 509–517.
Fisher, F. M., & McGowan, J. J. (1983). On the misuse of accounting rates of return to infer monopoly profits. The American Economic Review, 73(1), 82–97.
Garmon, C., & Haas-Wilson, D. (2011). Two hospital mergers on Chicago’s north shore: A retrospective study. International Journal of Economics and Business, 18(1), 17–32.
Genesove, D., & Mullin, W. P. (1998). Testing static oligopoly models: Conduct and cost in the sugar industry, 1890–1914. RAND Journal of Economics, 29(2), 355–377.
Hosken, D. S., Olsen, L. M., & Smith, L. K. (2018). Do retail mergers affect competition? Evidence from grocery retailing. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 27(1), 3–22.
Hovenkamp, H. (2019). Platforms and the rule of reason: The American Express case. Columbia Business Law Review, 2019(1), 34–92.
Katz, M. L. (2019). Ohio v. American Express: Assessing the threat to antitrust enforcement. Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle. Retrieved on October 12, 2020 from https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/CPI-Katz.pdf.
Miller, N. H. (2014). Modeling the effects of mergers in procurement. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 37, 201–208.
Miller, N. H., Remer, M., Ryan, C., & Sheu, G. (2017). Upward pricing pressure as a predictor of merger price effects. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 52, 216–247.
Miller, N.H., Sheu, G., & Weinberg, M. (2019). Oligopolistic price leadership and mergers: The United States beer industry. Working Paper. Retrieved on October 12, 2020 from https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_events/1494697/weinbergmillersheu.pdf.
Moresi, S., & Salop, S. C. (2013). vGUPPI: Scoring unilateral pricing incentives in vertical mergers. Antitrust Law Journal, 79(1), 185–214.
Nocke, V., & Whinston, M. D. (2020). Concentration Screens for Horizontal Mergers. NBER Working Paper No. 27533. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27533.
Ohio et al. v. American Express Company et al. (2018). 138 S. Ct. 2274, 201 L. Ed. 2d 678. Retrieved on October 13, 2020 from https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1454_5h26.pdf.
Peters, C. (2006). Evaluating the performance of merger simulation: Evidence from the US airline industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 49(2), 627–649.
Ramirez, E. (2013). Retrospectives at the FTC: Promoting an Antitrust Agenda. Remarks of the Chairwoman at the ABA Retrospective Analysis of Agency Determinations in Merger Transactions Symposium at the George Washington University Law School. Retrieved on October 12, 2020 from https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_statements/retrospectives-ftc-promoting-antitrust-agenda/130628aba-antitrust.pdf.
Salant, S. W., Switzer, S., & Reynolds, R. J. (1983). Losses from horizontal merger: The effect of an exogenous change in industry structure on Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(2), 185–199.
Tenn, S. (2008). The price effects of hospital mergers: A case study of the Sutter-Summit transaction. Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission. Working Paper #293. Retrieved on October 12, 2020 from https://www.ftc.gov/reports/price-effects-hospital-mergers-case-study-sutter-summit-transaction.
Thompson, A. (2009). The effect of hospital mergers on inpatient prices: A study of the New Hanover–Cape Fear transaction. Federal Trade Commission. Working Paper #295. Retrieved on October 12, 2020 from https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/effect-hospital-mergers-inpatient-prices-case-study-new-hanover-cape-fear-transaction/wp295.pdf.
Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission. (2000). United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Case No. No. 98-4107. 221 F.3d 928.
United States v. AT&T Inc., DirecTV Group Holdings, LLC, & Time Warner Inc. (2017). United States District Court, District of Columbia. Case No. 1:17-cv-17-02511-RJL. Complaint.
United States v. AT&T Inc., DirecTV Group Holdings, LLC, & Time Warner Inc. (2018). United States District Court, District of Columbia. 310 F.Supp.3d 161.
United States v. Sabre Corporation, Sabre Glbl Inc., Farelogix, Inc., & Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. (2020a). United States District Court, Delaware. Case No. 1:19-cv-001548-LPS. Opinion.
United States v. Sabre Corporation et al. (2020b). United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Case No. 20-1767. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission. (2004). Improving health care: A dose of competition. Retrieved on October 12, 2020 from https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/improving-health-care-dose-competition-report-federal-trade-commission-and-department-justice/040723healthcarerpt.pdf.
U.S. Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission. (2010). Horizontal Merger Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/hmg-2010.pdf.
Vita, M. G., & Sacher, S. B. (2001). The competitive effects of not-for-profit hospital mergers: A case study. Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(1), 63–84.
Weinberg, M. C. (2011). More evidence on the performance of merger simulations. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 101(3), 51–55.
Weinberg, M. C., & Hosken, D. (2013). Evidence on the accuracy of merger simulations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1584–1600.
Werden, G. J. (2002). Market delineation algorithms based on the hypothetical monopolist paradigm. Department of Justice Antitrust Division Economic Analysis Group Discussion Paper No. 02–8. Retrieved October 12, 2020 from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.327282.