Advertisement

Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 211–229 | Cite as

Athlete Pay and Competitive Balance in College Athletics

  • Brian Mills
  • Jason Winfree
Article

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the argument—which has been used by both the National Labor Relations Board and the National Collegiate Athletic Association—that unionization and/or player pay will hurt competitive balance in college sports. We present a theoretical analysis of universities that recruit athletes and examine the assumptions that are needed for player compensation to decrease competitive balance. We also empirically illustrate the differences in balance between professional and college sports. Given the theoretical and empirical analysis, we argue that unionization and/or player pay is unlikely to hurt competitive balance.

Keywords

College athletics Competitive balance Player pay 

References

  1. Berri, D. J., Brook, S. L., Frick, B., Fenn, A. J., & Vicente-Mayoral, R. (2005). The short supply of tall people: Competitive imbalance and the National Basketball Association. Journal of Economic Issues, 39(4), 1029–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, R. (2011). Research note: Estimates of college football player rents. Journal of Sports Economics, 12(2), 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, R. W. (1993). An estimate of the rent generated by a premium college football player. Economic Inquiry, 31(4), 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, R. W. (1994). Measuring cartel rents in the college basketball player recruitment market. Applied Economics, 26(1), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, R. W., & Jewell, R. T. (2006). The marginal revenue product of a women’s college basketball player. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 45(1), 96–101.Google Scholar
  6. Depken, C. A., & Wilson, D. P. (2006). NCAA enforcement and competitive balance in college football. Southern Economic Journal, 72(4), 826–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eckard, E. W. (1998). The NCAA cartel and competitive balance in college football. Review of Industrial Organization, 13(3), 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleisher, A. A., Shughart, W. F., & Tollison, R. D. (1988). Crime or punishment? Enforcement of the NCAA football cartel. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 10(4), 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fort, R. & Winfree, J. (2013). 15 sports myths and why they’re wrong. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hunsberger, P. K., & Gitter, S. R. (2015). What is a blue chip recruit worth? Estimating the marginal revenue product of college football quarterbacks. Journal of Sports Economics, 16(6), 664–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lane, E., Nagel, J., & Netz, J. S. (2014). Alternative approaches to measuring MRP: Are all men’s college basketball players exploited? Journal of Sports Economics, 15(3), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mills, B. M., & Salaga, S. (2015). Historical time series perspectives on competitive balance in NCAA Division I basketball. Journal of Sports Economics, 16(6), 614–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Quirk, J. (2004). College football conferences and competitive balance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25(2), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rottenberg, S. (1956). The baseball players’ labor market. Journal of Political Economy, 64(3), 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Salaga, S., & Fort, R. (2017). Structural change in competitive balance in big-time college football. Review of Industrial Organization, 50(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salaga, S., Ostfield, A., & Winfree, J. A. (2014). Revenue sharing with heterogeneous investments in sports leagues: Share media, not stadiums. Review of Industrial Organization, 45(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sutter, D., & Winkler, S. (2003). NCAA scholarship limits and competitive balance in college football. Journal of Sports Economics, 4(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J. Buchanan, R. Tollison, & G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rentseeking society (pp. 97–112). College Station: A&M University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Tourism, Recreation and Sport Management, College of Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, College of Agricultural and Life SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations