State of Play: How Do College Football Programs Compete for Student Athletes?
- 915 Downloads
Each year high school football players sign letters of intent with college football programs. The NCAA governs this matching market with strict rules that are designed to protect amateurism. DuMond et al. (J Sports Econ 9(1):67–87, 2008) develop a model of athlete choice. I consider the matching puzzle from the program’s perspective: What factors increase the likelihood that a school will successfully recruit an athlete? Like DuMond et al., I find that the state of play matters. However, my results suggest that football programs are willing to recruit outside their borders. In addition, the results align with prior findings about cheating in the NCAA. This extends the literature on college sport recruiting and may provide insight into other matching puzzles in academic, medical, and business job markets.
KeywordsFootball recruiting NCAA Matching
JEL ClassificationJ42 L13 Z21
I thank Roger Blair for organizing the symposium on NCAA behavior and Brad Humphreys, Nathan Wozny, Tobin McKearin, and Aaron Albert for their generosity and helpful comments.
- Brown, R. W., & Jewell, R. T. (2004). Measuring marginal revenue product in college athletics: Updated estimates. In J. Fizel & R. Forts (Eds.), Economics of college sports (pp. 153–162). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Brown, R. W., & Jewell, R. T. (2006). The marginal revenue product of a women’s college basketball player. Industrial Relations, 45(1), 96–101.Google Scholar
- Brown, T., Farrell, K. A., & Zorn, T. (2007). Performance measurement and matching: The market for football coaches. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 46(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
- Fleisher, A. A., Goff, B. L., & Tollison, R. D. (1992). The National Collegiate Athletic Association: A study in cartel behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Harris, J. S. (2016). The demand for student-athlete labor and the supply of violations in the NCAA. Marquette Sports Law Journal, 26(2), 411–432.Google Scholar
- Harris, J. S., & Berri, D. J. (2015). Predicting the WNBA draft: What matters most from college performance? International Journal of Sports Finance, 10, 199–216.Google Scholar
- Humphreys, B. R., & Ruseski, J. E. (2009). Monitoring cartel behavior and stability: Evidence from NCAA football. Southern Economic Journal, 75(3), 720–735.Google Scholar
- Roth, A.E. & Sotomayor, M. (1992) Two-sided matching. Handbook of Game Theory, 1, 486–541.Google Scholar