Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond “Ellison’s Matrix”: New Directions in Behavioral Industrial Organization

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss new research directions in the field of behavioral industrial organization that we find promising: identification of new unobservables in equilibrium models; strengthening links with abstract choice theory; and integrating behavioral IO models in larger models of the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This result corrected Proposition 6 in Eliaz and Spiegler (2011).

  2. For another attempt to marry choice-theoretic analysis of consumer behavior with an IO application, see Papi (2014).

References

  • Bernheim, D., & Rangel, D. (2009). Beyond revealed preference: Choice-theoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 51–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlin, M., O’Donoghue, T., & Vogelsang, T. (2007). Projection bias in catalog orders. American Economic Review, 97, 1217–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, D., Ichino, A., & Persico, N. (2014). Time allocation and task juggling. American Economic Review, 104, 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R., Doraszelski, U., & Draganska, M. (2009). The effect of advertising on brand awareness and perceived quality: An empirical investigation using panel data. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 7, 207–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Clippel, G., Eliaz, K., & Rozen, K. (2014). Competing for consumer inattention. Journal of Political Economy, 122, 1203–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 315–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliaz, K., Gamp, T., & Spiegler, R. (2013). Consideration sets and competitive marketing: Corrigendum. Working Paper. Tel-Aviv University.

  • Eliaz, K., & Spiegler, R. (2011). Consideration sets and competitive marketing. Review of Economic Studies, 78, 235–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliaz, K., & Spiegler, R. (2013). Reference-dependent preferences and labor market fluctuations. NBER Macroeconomic Annual, 28, 159–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G. (2006). Bounded rationality in industrial organization. In R. Blundell, W. Newey, & T. Persson (Eds.), Advances in economics and econometrics: Theory and applications (pp. 142–174)., Ninth world congress Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, M. (2015). Consumer inattention and bill-shock regulation. Review of Economic Studies, 82, 219–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, M., & Osborne, M. (2015). Cellular service demand: Biased beliefs, learning, and bill shock. American Economic Review, 105, 234–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidhues, P., & Köszegi, B. (2014). Regular prices and sales. Theoretical Economics, 9, 217–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidhues, P., Köszegi, B., & Murooka, T. (2012). Exploitative innovation. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (in press).

  • Hinnosaar, M. (2014). Time inconsistency and alcohol sales restrictions. Working Paper. Collegio Carlo Alberto.

  • Honka, E. (2014). Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. The Rand Journal of Economics, 45(4), 847–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenow, P., & Malin, B. (2010). Microeconomic evidence on price-setting. In B. M. Friedman & M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of monetary economics (Vol. 3, pp. 231–284). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 1133–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papi, M. (2014). Noncompensatory consideration and compensatory choice: An application to stackelberg competition. Economic Theory Bulletin, 2, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccione, M., & Spiegler, R. (2012). Price competition under limited comparability. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 97–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salant, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2008). (A, f): Choice with frames. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 1287–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovinsky, M. (2008). Limited information and advertising in the US Personal Computer Industry. Econometrica, 76, 1017–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegler, R. (2012). Consumer bounded rationality and rigidity/flexibility retail price patterns. Economics Letters, 116, 335–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegler, R. (2014a). On the equilibrium effects of nudging. Journal of Legal Studies (in press).

  • Spiegler, R. (2014b). Competitive framing. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6, 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2015). Why hire loan officers? Examining delegated expertise. Working Paper. University of Michigan.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Some of the research that this article is based on was supported by ERC Grant No. 230251. We thank two reviewers for useful comments

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Kfir Eliaz & Ran Spiegler

  2. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Kfir Eliaz

  3. University College London, London, UK

    Ran Spiegler

Authors
  1. Kfir Eliaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ran Spiegler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ran Spiegler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eliaz, K., Spiegler, R. Beyond “Ellison’s Matrix”: New Directions in Behavioral Industrial Organization. Rev Ind Organ 47, 259–272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-015-9470-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-015-9470-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation