Firm Size and Growth Rate Variance: The Effects of Data Truncation
- 822 Downloads
This paper discusses the effects of the existence of natural and/or exogenously imposed thresholds in firm size distributions on estimations of the relation between firm size and the variance in firm growth rates. We argue that these estimations are upwardly biased whenever the threshold operates on the same proxy that is used to calculate the growth rates. We show the potential impact of the bias on simulated data, suggest a methodology to improve these estimations, and present an empirical analysis on Dutch firms. The only stable relation that emerges is the negative relationship between firm size and growth rate variance.
KeywordsFirm growth Growth rate variance Thresholds Truncation
JEL ClassificationL25 C21
The authors thank Lawrence J. White (general editor), two anonymous referees, Andrew Bernard, Koen Frenken, and the participants at the DIME Workshop on “The dynamics of firm evolution: productivity, profitability and growth”, Pisa, 3–4 October 2008. The empirical work was carried out at the Centre for Research of Economic Microdata at Statistics Netherlands (CBS). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies of Statistics Netherlands. The authors thank Gerhard Meinen and on-site staff of CBS for their collaboration. This work was supported by Utrecht University [High Potential Grant (HIPO) to E. Cefis and K. Frenken]; and the University of Bergamo [grant ex 60 %, n. 60CEFI11, Department of Economics, to E. Cefis].
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- Baum C. F. (2006) An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. Stata Press, College station, TXGoogle Scholar
- Gibrat R. (1931) Les inégalités économiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Meyer J. R., Kuh E. (1957) The investment decision. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- Perline, R., Axtell, R., & Teitelbaum, D. (2006). Volatility and asymmetry of small firm growth rates over increasing time frames. U.S. Small Business Administration, The Office of Advocacy Small Business Working Papers 06/rarpdt. Retrieved October 1, 2008, from http://ideas.repec.org/p/sba/wpaper/06rarpdt.html.
- Steindl J. (1965) Random processes and the growth of firms: A study of the Pareto law. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Sutton J. (1997) Gibrat’s Legacy. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 40–59Google Scholar