Abstract
China’s merger policy and enforcement approaches since its Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) took effect in August 2008 are by and large based on the same conceptual framework that is employed in advanced economies. While China has shown a very fast learning capability in conducting competition analysis, further capacity building in China is crucial. There is no clear evidence of industrial policy considerations being at the forefront in the eight published decisions by the Ministry of Commerce to date, except for its very early decisions. We propose a competition-neutral principle, which requires that a competition test be conducted before, and independently from, any consideration of industrial policy and argue that industrial policy matters only for competition-neutral mergers. On a more technical level, if China adopts the total welfare standard, then its treatment of efficiencies and the meaning of sufficiency of entry post merger should be modified accordingly from the US/EU consumer-oriented model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cramer, N. (2010). Waiting for the other shoe: Merger review under the PRC Anti Monopoly Law. Working paper.
Fallon J. (2005) ACCC’s authorisation of decisions: Interpretation of public interest. Agenda 12(4): 335–350
Fels, A. (2012). China’s Anti-Monopoly Law 2008: An overview. Rev Ind Organ doi:10.1007/s11151-012-9342-y.
James, C. A. (2002). Giant steps, remarks on the occasion of the twentieth anniversary of the 1982 merger guidelines. Available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/hmerger/11253.pdf.
Li G. (2009) Can the PRC’s new Anti-Monopoly Law stop monopolistic activities: Let the PRC’s telecommunications industry tell you the answer. Telecommunications Policy 33: 360–370
Lin, P. (2005). Competition policy in China: Interactions with industrial and FDI policies. In S. Evernett & D. Brooks (Eds.), Competition policy and development in east Asia (pp. 71–106). London: Routledge.
Lin, P. (2009a). Balancing competition policy and industrial policy under China’s AML, presentation at the 5th summer workshop on industrial organization and management strategy. Qinghua University, Beijing.
Lin, P. (2009b). The unilateral effects of horizontal mergers (in Chinese). MOFCOM Internal Publication.
Lin. P. (2009c). The coordinated effects of horizontal mergers (in Chinese). MOFCOM Internal Publication.
Lin, P. (2010). Assessment of the unilateral effects and coordinated effects of mergers in the US and the EU and implications for China. MOFCOM Internal Publication.
Ministry of Commerce: (2007) Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China: Interpretations and applications. The Law Press, Beijing
Shan, P., Tan, G., Wilkie, S.J., & Williams, M.A. (2012). China’s Anti-Monopoly Law: What is the welfare standard? Rev Ind Organ. doi:10.1007/s11151-012-9349-5.
Sun H., Zhao J. (2011) China Introduces National Security Review for Foreign Investments. Norton Rose, London
Wang X. Y. (2008) On the Anti-Monopoly Law, (in Chinese). Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing
Williamson O. (1968) Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare tradeoffs. American Economic Review 58: 407–426
Wu, C. Q., & Liu, Z. C. (2012). A tiger without teeth? regulation of administrative monopoly under China’s Anti-Monopoly Law. Rev Ind Organ. doi:10.1007/s11151-012-9351-y.
Yin, Y. L. (2010). China’s merger control legislation and enforcement. Presentation at the Asian competition forum conference. Available at http://www.asiancompetitionforum.org/download/20101207_ACF_ppt/2-02%2020101206present_final.pdf.
Zhang, X. Z. (2011). Oracle and sun merger: The economic analysis. Power-point presentation at Dalian international conference on industrial organization. Dalian.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, P., Zhao, J. Merger Control Policy Under China’s Anti-Monopoly Law. Rev Ind Organ 41, 109–132 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-012-9345-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-012-9345-9