Abstract
This paper investigates the exercise of market power by a large buyer who emerges via growth, merger, or group purchasing. It explores the efficiency and redistributive effects of such an event when a competitive fringe of small buyers remains in the market. Terms of trade, including those for small buyers, depend on structural conditions on the supply side of the market and the nature of interactions between the newly emerged dominant buyer and suppliers. Predicted aggregate welfare effects have implications for antitrust.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker J. B., Farrell J., Shapiro C. (2008) Merger to Monopoly to Serve a Single Buyer: Comment. Antitrust Law Journal 75: 637–646
Bernheim B. D., Whinston M. D. (1998) Exclusive dealing. Journal of Political Economy 106: 64–103
Blair R. D., Harrison J. L. (1993) Monopsony: Antitrust law and economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Campbell T. (2007) Bilateral Monopoly in Mergers. Antitrust Law Journal 74: 521–536
Chen Z. (2003) Dominant retailers and the countervailing-power hypothesis. RAND Journal of Economics 34: 612–625
Chipty T., Snyder C. M. (1999) Buyer size and bargaining power. Review of Economics and Statistics 81: 326–340
Dana, J. (2006). Buyer groups as strategic commitments. Retrieved February 10, 2010, from The Center for the Study of Industrial Organization at Northwestern University Web site: http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/csio/Papers/2005/CSIO-WP-0067.pdf.
Dobson, P. W., & Inderst, R. (2008) The waterbed effect: Where buying and selling power come together. Wisconsin Law Review, 331–357.
Dobson P. W., Waterson M. (1997) Countervailing power and consumer prices. The Economic Journal 107: 418–430
Galbraith J. K. (1952) American capitalism: The concept of countervailing power. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Galbraith J. K. (1954) Countervailing power. American Economic Review 44: 1–6
Inderst, R., & Shaffer, G. (2008). Buyer power in Merger control. In W. D. Collins (Ed.), Issues in competition law and policy (Vol. II, pp. 1611–1635). Chicago: American Bar Association.
Inderst R., Valletti T. M. (2009) Price discrimination in input markets. RAND Journal of Economics 40: 1–19
Majumdar, A. (2005). Waterbed effects and buyer mergers. Retrieved February 10, 2010, from ESRC Centre for Competition Policy at University of East Anglia Web site: http://www.uea.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.104475!ccp05-7.pdf.
Marvel H. P., Yang H. (2008) Group purchasing, nonlinear tariffs, and oligopoly. International Journal of Industrial Organization 26: 1090–1105
Mathewson G. F., Winter R. A. (1987) The competitive effects of vertical agreements: Comment. American Economic Review 77: 1037–1062
Mathewson G. F., Winter R. A. (1996) Buyer groups. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15: 137–164
Noll R. G. (2005) “Buyer Power” and economic policy. Antitrust Law Journal 72: 589–624
O’Brien D. P., Shaffer’s G. (1997) Nonlinear supply contracts, exclusive dealing, and equilibrium market foreclosure. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 6: 755–785
Stigler G. J. (1965) The dominant firm and the inverted umbrella. Journal of Law and Economics 8: 167–172
Tirole J. (1988) The theory of industrial organization. MIT Press, Cambridge
von Ungen-Sternberg T. (1996) Countervailing power revisited. International Journal of Industrial Organization 14: 507–520
Whinston’s M. D. (2006) Lectures on antitrust economics. MIT Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mills, D.E. Buyer Power and Industry Structure. Rev Ind Organ 36, 213–225 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-010-9244-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-010-9244-x