Skip to main content
Log in

Collusive Communication and Pricing Coordination in a Retail Gasoline Market

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies how communication is used by a retail gasoline cartel in Australia to coordinate price increases, a role of communication in collusion not highlighted by Genesove and Mullin (Am Econ Rev 91(3): 379–398, 2001). A unique data set from the trial record allows for quantifying not only the pricing dynamics, but also the communication patterns. Both empirical and narrative evidence suggests the collusive communication and pricing behavior is well captured by the price cycle equilibrium of the Maskin and Tirole (Econometrica 56(3): 571–599, 1988) model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson O., Wengstrom E.: Do antitrust laws facilitate collusion? Experimental evidence on costly communication in duopolies. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109(2), 321–339 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athey S., Bagwell K.: Optimal collusion with private information. RAND Journal of Economics 32(3), 428–465 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson B. (2007). Retail gasoline price cycles: Evidence from Guelph, Ontario using bi- hourly, station-specific retail price data. Mimeo.

  • Borenstein S.: Rapid price communication and coordination: The airline tariff publishing case. In: Kwoka, J.E. Jr, White, L.J.(eds) The antitrust revolution: Economics, competition, and policy, pp. 233–251. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Compte O.: Communication in repeated games with imperfect private monitoring. Econometrica 66(3), 597–626 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor J.M.: Global price fixing: Our customers are the enemy. Kluwer, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton P.C., Palfrey T.R.: Cartel enforcement with cost uncertainty. International Economic Review 31(1), 17–47 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert A.: Retail price cycles and the presence of small firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21, 151–170 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert A., West D.: Retail gasoline price cycles across spatially dispersed gasoline stations. Journal of Law and Economics 47, 245–271 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genesove D., Mullin W.P.: Rules, communication, and collusion: narrative evidence from the sugar institute case. American Economic Review 91(3), 379–398 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham D.A., Marshall R.C.: Collusive bidder behavior at single-object second-price and english auctions. Journal of Political Economy 95(6), 1217–1239 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green E.J., Porter R.H.: Non-cooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica 52, 87–100 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington J.E. Jr.: How do cartels operate? Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics 2(1), 1–105 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay G.A.: Practices that facilitate cooperation: The ethyl case. In: Kwoka, J.E. Jr., White, L.J.(eds) The antitrust revolution: Economics, competition, and policy (3rd ed), pp. 182–201. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandori M., Matsushima H.: Private observation, communication and collusion. Econometrica 66(3), 627–652 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenstein M.C., Suslow V.Y.: What determines cartel success? Journal of Economic Literature 44(1), 43–95 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskin E., Tirole J.: A theory of dynamic oligopoly, II: Price competition, kinked demand curves and edgeworth cycles. Econometrica 56(3), 571–599 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee R.P., McMillan J.: Bidding rings. American Economic Review 82(3), 579–599 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon B.: Do meetings in smoke-filled rooms facilitate collusion? Journal of Political Economy 105(2), 330–350 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, M. (2006). Edgeworth price cycles and focal prices: Computational dynamic Markov equilibria. Mimeo.

  • Noel M.: Edgeworth price cycles: Evidence from the Toronto retail gasoline market. Journal of Industrial Economics 55(1), 69–92 (2007a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel M.: Edgeworth price cycles, cost-based pricing and sticky pricing in retail gasoline markets. Review of Economics and Statistics 89(2), 324–334 (2007b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter R.H.: Detecting collusion. Review of Industrial Organization 26, 147–167 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler G.J.: A theory of oligopoly. Journal of Political Economy 72(1), 44–61 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J.: The theory of industrial organization. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. (2007). Station level gasoline demand in a market with regular price cycles. Mimeo.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongmin Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Z. Collusive Communication and Pricing Coordination in a Retail Gasoline Market. Rev Ind Organ 32, 35–52 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9163-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9163-2

Keywords

Navigation