Abstract
Serial correlation in annual growth rates carries a lot of information on growth processes – it allows us directly to observe firm performance as well as to test theories. Using a seven-year balanced panel of 10,000 French manufacturing firms, we observe that small firms typically are subject to negative correlation of annual growth rates, whereas larger firms display positive correlation. Furthermore, we find that those small firms that experience extreme positive or negative growth in any one year are unlikely to repeat this performance in the following year.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almus M., Nerlinger E. (2000) Testing ‘Gibrat’s law’ for young firms—empirical results for West Germany. Small Business Economics 15: 1–12
Binder M., Hsiao C., Pesaran C.H. (2005) Estimation and inference in short panel vector autoregressions with unit roots and cointegration. Econometric Theory 21, 795–837
Boeri T., Cramer U. (1992) Employment growth, incumbents and entrants: Evidence from Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organization 10: 545–565
Bottazzi G., Cefis E., Dosi G. (2002) Corporate growth and industrial structure: Some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 11: 705–723
Bottazzi G., Cefis E., Dosi G., Secchi A. (2007) Invariances and diversities in the evolution of manufacturing industries. Small Business Economics 29: 137–159
Bottazzi, G., Coad, A., Jacoby, N., & Secchi, A. (2005). Corporate growth and industrial dynamics: Evidence from French manufacturing. Pisa, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, LEM Working Paper Series 2005/21.
Bottazzi G., Dosi G., Lippi M., Pammolli F., Riccaboni M. (2001) Innovation and corporate growth in the evolution of the drug industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization 19: 1161–1187
Bottazzi G., Secchi A. (2003) Common properties and sectoral specificities in the dynamics of U. S. manufacturing companies. Review of Industrial Organization 23: 217–232
Bottazzi G., Secchi A. (2006) Explaining the distribution of firms growth rates. Rand Journal of Economics 37(2): 235–256
Chesher A. (1979) Testing the law of proportionate effect. Journal of Industrial Economics 27(4): 403–411
Coad, A. (2006a). Towards an explanation of the exponential distribution of firm growth rates. Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques No. 06025 (Série Rouge), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, France.
Coad, A. (2006b). A closer look at serial growth rate correlation. Pisa, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, LEM Working Paper Series 2006/29.
Coad, A. & Rao, R. (2006). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Pisa, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, LEM Working Paper Series 2006/18.
Dunne P., Hughes A. (1994) Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. Journal of Industrial Economics 42(2): 115–140
Friedman M. (1992) Do old fallacies ever die?. Journal of Economic Literature 30(4): 2129–2132
Garnsey E., Heffernan P. (2005) Growth setbacks in new firms. Futures 37(7): 675–697
Geroski P.A., Machin S., Walters C. (1997) Corporate growth and profitability. Journal of Industrial Economics 45(2): 171–189
Geroski P.A., Mazzucato M. (2002) Learning and the sources of corporate growth. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(4): 623–644
Goddard J., Wilson J., Blandon P. (2002) Panel tests of Gibrat’s Law for Japanese manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization 20: 415–433
Hannan M., Freeman J. (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49(2): 149–164
Ijiri Y., Simon H.A. (1967) A model of business firm growth. Econometrica 35(2): 348–355
Jovanovic B. (1982) Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica 50: 649–670
Koenker R., Bassett G. (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46: 33–50
Koenker R., Hallock K.F. (2001) Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4): 143–156
Kumar M.S. (1985) Growth, acquisition activity and firm size: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Industrial Economics 33(3): 327–338
Lotti F., Santarelli E., Vivarelli M. (2003) Does Gibrat’s law hold among young, small firms?. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13: 213–235
Singh A., Whittington G. (1975) The size and growth of firms. Review of Economic Studies 42(1): 15–26
Wagner J. (1992) Firm size, firm growth, and persistence of chance: Testing Gibrat’s law with establishment data from lower saxony, 1978–1989. Small Business Economics 2(4): 125–131
Weiss C. (1998) Size, growth, and survival in the upper Austrian farm sector. Small Business Economics 10: 305–312
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Thanks go to Carlo Bianchi, Giulio Bottazzi, Domenico Delli Gatti, Giovanni Dosi, Bernard Paulré, Rekha Rao and participants at the LEM conference on ‘Reappraising Economics as an Empirically Disciplined Science’ in Volterra in September 2006 for helpful comments. I am also indebted to Larry White (the editor) and two anonymous referees for many insightful remarks and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coad, A. A Closer Look at Serial Growth Rate Correlation. Rev Ind Organ 31, 69–82 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-007-9135-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-007-9135-y