Skip to main content
Log in

PPI Partnerships vs. PPI Divorces in LDCs

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last 15 years, a variety of public private-partnerships in infrastructure have been adopted throughout the developing and transition world. Because many of these experiences are also turning sour, it seems important to separate facts from emotions. The paper argues that the wide differences in interpretations of the facts can be explained by differences in the assessment criteria used to assess the incremental effect of reforms. It is also driven by the sectors, the regions and the actors on which the analysis tends to focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam A. et al. (2005) Growth, Poverty and Inequality: Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitez D., Chisari O., Estache A. (2003) ‘Can the Gains from Argentina’s Utilities Reform Offset Credit Shocks?’. In: Ugaz C., Waddams Price C. (eds) Utility Privatization and Regulation: A Fair Deal for Consumers?. Edward Elgar, Northampton MAS, pp. 175–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos J., Estache A., Martin N., Trujillo L. (2003) ‘Macroeconomic Effects of Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure’. In: Easterly W., Serven L. (eds) The Limits of Stabilization. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli T., Estache A., Perelman S., Trujillo L. (2003) A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators. World Bank Institute Publications, Studies in Development Series, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collignon, B. and M. Vezina (2000) ‘Independent Water and Sanitation Providers in African Cities: Full Report of a Ten-Country Study, Water and Sanitation Program’, UNDP-World Bank, April 2000.

  • Easterly W., Serven L. (2003) The Limits of Stabilization: Infrastructure, Public Deficits and Growth in Latin America. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfahani H.S., Ramirez M.T. (2003) ‘Institutions, Infrastructure, and Economic Growth’. Journal of Development Economics 70(2):443–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A. (2004) ‘What do we know about SSA’s infrastructure’, mimeo, The World Bank

  • Estache A., Pinglo M.E. (2005) ‘Are Returns to Private Infrastructure in Developing Countries Consistent with Risks since the Asian Crisis’. Journal of Network Industries 6(1):47–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Estache A., Rossi M. (2002) ‘How Different is the Efficiency of Public and Private Water Companies in Asia’. World Bank Economic Review 16(1):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estache A., Rossi M. (2005) ‘Do Regulation and Ownership Drive the Efficiency of Electricity Distribution? Evidence from Latin America’. Economic Letters 86(2):253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estache, A. and T. Serebrisky (2006) ‘Where Do We Stand on Transport Infrastructure Deregulation and Public-Private Partnerships?’, in OECD-ECMT, Transport Services: The Limits of (De-)Regulation, Round Table 129, Paris, pp. 33–62

  • Estache A., Foster V., Wodon Q. (2002) Accounting for Poverty in Infrastructure Reform. The World Bank Institute of Development Studies, Washington, D.C.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch J.-L. (2004) Granting and Renegotiating Infrastructure Concessions. The World Bank Institute of Development Studies, Washington, D.C.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kessides I. (2004) Reforming Infrastructure: Privatization, Regulation and Competition. World Bank, Policy Research Report Series, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellis J., Birdsall N. (2005) Reality Check: The Distributional Impact of Privatization in Developing countries. Center for Global Development, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern J., Holder S. (1999) ‘Regulatory Governance: Criteria for Assessing the Performance of Regulatory Systems: An Application to Infrastructure Industries in the Developing Countries of Asia’. Utilities Policy 8:33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugaz C., Waddams Price C. (2003) Utility Privatization and Regulation: A Fair Deal for Consumers?. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1999) ‘Privatization in Latin America in the Early 1990s’, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ST/ESA/PAD/SER.E/17

  • Velez, C. E. (1995) ‘Gasto Social y Desigualdad: Logros y Extravios, Social Misión’, nacional Planning Department, Santa Fe de Bogota.

  • Wallsten S. (2003) ‘Of Carts and Horses: Regulation and Privatization in Telecommunications Reforms’. The Journal of Policy Reform 6(4):217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1994) World Development Report (Infrastructure), Washington, D.C.

  • World Bank (2004) World Development Report (Investment Climate), Washington, D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Estache.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Estache, A. PPI Partnerships vs. PPI Divorces in LDCs. Rev Ind Organ 29, 3–26 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-006-9107-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-006-9107-7

Keywords

Navigation