Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 359–378 | Cite as

Hassle Costs, Price-Matching Guarantees and Price Competition: An Experiment



We experimentally investigate whether the collusion-facilitating nature of price-matching guarantees survives the introduction of hassle costs incurred by buyers to enforce these guarantees. The presence of an arbitrarily small number of positive hassle costs buyers may completely undermine incentives for collusion. To evaluate this possibility, we develop four one-shot price competition models that test the hassle cost argument by varying proportions of positive and zero hassle cost buyers present in the market. Although the theory predicts that the competitive price should emerge in equilibrium in all four models, we experimentally find significant price differences.


Experiment hassle costs price-matching guarantees 

JEL classifications

L11 L12 C91 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arbatskaya M. (2001) ‘Can Low-Price Guarantees Deter Entry’? International Journal of Industrial Organization 42, 1387–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbatskaya, M., M. Hviid and G. Shaffer (1999) ‘Promises to Match or Beat the Evidence from Retail Tire Prices’, in M. R. Baye ed., Advances in Applied 8, New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 123–138.Google Scholar
  3. Arbatskaya M., Hviid M., Shaffer G.(2004) ‘On the Incidence and Variety of Low-Price Guarantees’. Journal of Law & Economics 47: 307–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baye M., Kovenock D. (1994) ‘How to Sell a Pickup Truck: ‘Beat-or-Pay’ Advertisements as Facilitating Devices’. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12, 21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belton T.M. (1987) ‘A Model of Duopoly and Meeting or Beating Competition’. International Journal of Industrial Organization 5, 399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamberlin E.H. (1962) The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, 8th edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Z. (1995) ‘How low is a Guaranteed-lowest-price’? Canadian Journal of Economics 28, 683–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y., Narasimhan C., Zang J.Z.(2001) ‘Consumer Heterogeneity and Competitive Price-Matching Guarantees’. Marketing Science 20, 300–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corts K.S.(1996) ‘On the Competitive Effects of Price-Matching Policies’. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15, 283–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixit A.K., Nalebuff B.J.(1991) Thinking Strategically. W.W. Norton, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Deck C., Wilson B.(2003) ‘Automated Pricing Rules in Electronic Posted Offer Markets’. Economic Inquiry 41, 208–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle C. (1988) ‘Different Selling Strategies in Bertrand Oligopoly’. Economics Letters 28, 387–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dufwenberg M., Gneezy U.(2000) ‘Price competition and Market Concentration: An Experimental Study’. International Journal of Industrial Organization 18, 7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dugar, S. (2005) ‘Do Price-Matching Guarantees Facilitate Collusion, An Experiment’, University of Arizona Working paper, Department of Economics, available at: working_papers/Econ-WP-05–02.pdfGoogle Scholar
  15. Edlin A.S. (1997) ‘Do Guaranteed- Low Price Policies Guarantee High Prices, and Can Antitrust Rise to the Challenge’? Harvard Law Review 111, 528–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edlin A.S., Emch E.R.(1999) ‘The Welfare Losses from Price-Matching Policies’. Journal of Industrial Economics 47, 145–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fatas, E. and J. Manez (2004) ‘Do Price Matching Guarantees facilitate Higher Prices? An Experimental approach’, Working Paper, University of Valencia, LINEEX.Google Scholar
  18. Fischbacher, U. (1999) ‘Z-Tree. Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments’, IEW Working paper 21, University of Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
  19. Hess J.D., Gerstner E.(1991) ‘Price-Matching Policies: An Empirical Case’. Managerial Decision Economics 12, 305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hviid M., Shaffer G. (1999) ‘Hassle Costs: The Achilles’ Heel of Price-Matching Guarantees’. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 8, 489–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin Y.J. (1988) ‘Price Matching in a Model of Equilibrium Price Dispersion’. Southern Economic Journal 55, 57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Logan J.W., Lutter R.W.(1989) ‘Guaranteed Lowest Prices: Do they Facilitate Collusion’. Economics Letters 31, 189–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manez, A. C. J. (2005) ‘Unbeatable Value: collusive mechanism or advertising strategy’? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  24. Moorthy, S. and R. Winter (2006) ‘Price-Matching Guarantees’, Rand Journal of Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  25. Oaxaca R.L., Dickinson D.L.(2005) ‘The Equivalence of Panel Data Estimator Under Orthogonal Experimental Design’. University of Arizona, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  26. Oster S. (1994) Modern Competitive Analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, NewYork, NYGoogle Scholar
  27. Png I.P.L., Hirshleifer D.(1987) ‘Price Discrimination through Offers to Match Price’. Journal of Business 60, 365–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Posner R.A. (1976) Antitrust Law. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenthal R. (1966) Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research. Appleton- Century Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Salop, S. C. (1986) ‘Practices that (Credibly) Facilitate Oligopoly Coordination’, in J. E. Stiglitz and G. F. Mathewson eds., New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sargent M. (1993) ‘Economics Upside-down: Low-price Guarantees as Mechanisms for Facilitating Tacit Collusion’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141, 2055–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations