Insurance firms in the United States generally operate on a multiline basis, meaning that they provide coverage for two or more insurance lines, such as auto and homeowner insurance. Most states, however, require that firms offering mortgage or title insurance operate on a monoline basis, meaning that an insurance firm may provide coverage against only one type of risk. This paper investigates the conditions under which monoline restrictions represent efficient regulatory policy. Monoline requirements are an intriguing issue because multiline insurance firms receive the diversification benefit that the firm’s capital is available to pay insurance claims on any of its lines. The paper shows, however, that the specific features of the mortgage and title insurance lines create a special case in which monoline restrictions may represent efficient regulatory policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Alger, George, (1934) Report to His Excellency, Herbert H. Lehman, Governor of the State of New York.
American Land Title Association (2005a) ‘2004 Market Share’, available at http://www.alta.org/industry/financial.cfm.
American Land Title Association (2005b) ‘Title Insurance: A Comprehensive Overview’, available at http://www.alta.org/press/TitleInsuranceOverview.pdf.
Association of Financial Guaranty Insurers. (2005) ‘Advantages of the Monoline Structure’, available on line at: http://www.afgi.org/monoline.htm.
Best, A. M. (2004) ‘Special Report: Title Industry Running on All Cylinders’, October 4, 2004, available at http://www.alta.org/industry/AMBest04.pdf.
Boyer, M. Martin, and Charles Nyce (2004) “‘Banks as Insurance Referral Agents” Evidence from the Title Insurance Industry’, March 2004.
J. David Cummins (2000) ArticleTitle‘Allocation of Capital in the Insurance Industry’ Risk Management and Insurance Review 3 7–28
J. David Cummins Martin Grace Richard Phillips (1999) ArticleTitle‘Regulatory Solvency Prediction in Property-Liability Insurance: Risk-Based Capital, Audit Ratios, and Cash Flow Simulation’ Journal of Risk and Insurance 66 417–458
Patricia Danzon (1992) ArticleTitle‘The McCarran-Ferguson Act: Anticompetitive or Procompetitive?’ Regulation 15 2
Garamendi, John (2003) ‘Garamendi Issues Final Order Prohibiting Sale of Radian Lien Protection Policy’, News Release, the California Department of Insurance, July 22, 2003.
Garamendi, John (2005) ‘Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi Announcement Major Settlement Agreements with Title Insurers’, News Release, the California Department of Insurance, July 20, 2005.
Graaskamp, James (1967) Journal of Risk and Insurance 34(1), 47–67.
Dwight Jaffee Thomas Russell (1997) ArticleTitle‘Catastrophe Insurance, Capital Markets, and Uninsurable Risks’ Journal of Risk and Insurance 64 IssueID2 205–230
Jaffee, Dwight, and Thomas Russell (1998a) ‘Catastrophe Insurance, Dynamic Premium Strategies and the Market for Capital’, in Robert W. Klein, (ed.), Alternative Approaches to Insurance Regulation. National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Jaffee, Dwight and Thomas Russell (1998b) ‘The Causes And Consequences of Rate Regulation in the Auto Insurance Industry’, in David Bradford, (ed.), The Economics of Property-Casualty Insurance, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jaffee, Dwight, and Thomas Russell (2002) ‘Regulation of Auto Insurance in California’, in J. David Cummins, (ed.), Deregulating Property-Liability Insurance, chapter 5, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, pp. 195–236.
Jaffee, Dwight, and Thomas Russell (2003) ‘Markets Under Stress: The Case of Extreme Event Insurance’, in Richard Arnott, Bruce Greenwald, Ravi Kanbur, and Barry Nalebuff, (ed.), Economics for an Imperfect World: Essays in Honor of Joseph E. Stiglitz. MIT Press.
James Kau Donald Keenan W. Muller (1993) ArticleTitle‘An Option-Based Pricing Model of Private Mortgage Insurance’ Journal of Risk and Insurance 60 IssueID2 288–299
James Kau Donald Keenan (1996) ArticleTitle‘An Option-Theoretic Model of Catastrophes Applied to Mortgage Insurance’ Journal of Risk and Insurance 63 IssueID4 639–656
Kiley, David (1986) ‘PMIs Post First-Time Net Loss, EPIC Blamed’, National Thrift News, May 26, 1986.
Lipshutz, Nelson R. (1994) The Regulatory Economics of Title Insurance. Praeger.
Moody’s Investors Service s(2003) ‘Rating Methodology: Credit Risks of Mortgage Insurers’, December 19, 2003, available at: http://www.moodys.com/moodys/cust/research/MDCdocs/20/2002300000425570.pdf.
Mortgage Insurance Companies of America. (2004) ‘2004–2005 Fact Book’, available at http://www.micanews.com/press/factsheets.cfm.
Stewart Myers James Read (2001) ArticleTitle‘Capital Allocation in Insurance Companies’ Journal of Risk and Insurance 68 IssueID4 545–580
Charles Nyce M. Martin Boyer (1998) ArticleTitle‘An Analysis of the Title Insurance Industry’ Journal of Insurance Regulation 17 IssueID2 213–242
Richard Phillips David Cummins Franklin Allen (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Financial Pricing of Insurance the Multiple-Line Insurance Company’ Journal of Risk and Insurance 65 597–636
Rapkin, Chester (1973) The Private Insurance of Home Mortgages. Revised Edition.
Standard and Poor’s (2002) ‘Bond Insurance Overview and Analytical Focus’, May 28, 2002, available on line at: http://www.afgi.org/pdfs/sp%20overview%200502.pdf
US Department of the Treasury (2005) ‘Assessment: The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002’, June 30, 2005.
Lawrence White (1984) ArticleTitle‘The Title Insurance Industry, Reverse Competition, and Controlled Business’ The Journal of Risk and Insurance 51 308–319
About this article
Cite this article
Jaffee, D. Monoline Restrictions, with Applications to Mortgage Insurance and Title Insurance. Rev Ind Organ 28, 83–108 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-006-6642-1
- monoline restriction
- mortgage insurance
- title insurance