Skip to main content
Log in

Technology and the Size Distribution of Firms: Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical studies have shown that the size distribution of firms can be described as a Pareto distribution. However, these studies have focused on large firms and aggregate statistics. Little attention has been placed on the role of technology in shaping firm size distributions. Using a comprehensive dataset of manufacturing firms and the Community Innovation Survey from the Netherlands, the paper investigates the relationship between firm size and technology. It shows that technological factors shape the distribution of firm size, suggesting that the Pareto law is not an invariant property and that technology can constrain the “self-organising” character of industrial economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R.L. Axtell (2001) ArticleTitle‘Zipf Distribution of US Firm Sizes’ Science 293 1818–1820 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1062081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Bak (1997) How Nature Works Oxford University Press Oxford, Oxford, UK and New York, US

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Bottazzi G. Dosi M. Lippi F. Pammolli M. Riccaboni (2001) ArticleTitle‘Innovation and Corporate Growth in the Evolution of the Drug Industry’ International Journal of Industrial Organization 19 1161–1187 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00068-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Breschi F. Malerba L. Orsenigo (2000) ArticleTitle‘Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation’ Economic Journal 110 388–410 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Buchanan (1997) ArticleTitle‘One Law to Rule Them All’ New Scientist magazine 156 30

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Cabral J. Mata (2003) ArticleTitle‘On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory’ American Economic Review 93 1075–1990

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Caves (1998) ArticleTitle‘Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms’ Journal of Economic Literature 36 1947–1982

    Google Scholar 

  • W.M. Cohen (1995) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovative Activities’ P. Stoneman (Eds) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change Basil Blackwell Oxford 182–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., and R. C. Levin (1989) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in R. Schmalensee and R. Willing (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 1060–1107.

  • W.M. Cohen R.C. Levin D.C. Mowery (1987) ArticleTitle‘Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Re-Examination’ The Journal of Industrial Economics 35 543–565

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Dosi (1982) ArticleTitle‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change’ Research Policy 11 147–162 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Dosi (1988) ArticleTitle‘Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’ Journal of Economic Literature 26 1120–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Dosi O. Marsili L. Orsenigo R. Salvatore (1995) ArticleTitle‘Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of Industrial Structures’ Small Business Economics 7 411–436 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01112463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.A. Geroski (1994) Market Structure, Corporate Performance, and Innovative Activity Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gibrat (1931) Les Inégalités Économiques Sirey Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Gopikrishnan V. Plerou L.A.N. Amaral M. Meyer H.E. Stanley (1999) ArticleTitle‘Scaling of the Distribution of Fluctuations of Financial Market Indices’ Physical Review E 60 5305–5316 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevE.60.5305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Gort S. Klepper (1982) ArticleTitle‘Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations’ Economic Journal 92 630–653

    Google Scholar 

  • W.H. Greene (2000) Econometric Analysis Prentice-Hall International Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Henrekson D. Johansson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Institutional Effects on the Evolution of the Size Distribution of Firms’ Small Business Economics 12 11–23 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008002330051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.M. Hill (1975) ArticleTitle‘A Simple General Approach to Inference About the Tail of a Distribution’ The Annals of Statistics 3 1163–1174

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Ijiri H. Simon (1971) ArticleTitle‘Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions on Business Firm Concentration’ Journal of Political Economy 79 314–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Ijiri H. Simon (1974) ArticleTitle‘Interpretations of Departures from the Pareto Curve Firm-Size Distributions’ Journal of Political Economy 82 315–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri Y., Simon H. (1977). Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms. Amsterdam: North-Holland, New York.

  • S. Katz (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Self-Similar Science System’ Research Policy 28 501–517 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00010-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.R. Krugman (1995) ArticleTitle‘Innovation and Agglomeration: Two Parables Suggested by City-Size Distributions’ Japan and the World Economy 7 371–390

    Google Scholar 

  • P.R. Krugman (1996) The Self-Organizing Economy Blackwell Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Kwoka (1982) ArticleTitle‘Regularity and Diversity in Firm Size Distributions in U.S. Industries’ Journal of Economics and Business 34 391–395 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0148-6195(82)90045-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.C. Levin W.M. Cohen D.C. Mowery (1985) ArticleTitle‘R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses’ Issues in the Economics of R&D 75 20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A.F. Machado J. Mata (2000) ArticleTitle‘Box-Cox Quantile Regression and the Distribution of Firm Sizes’ Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 253–274 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1099-1255(200005/06)15:3<253::AID-JAE559>3.0.CO;2-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. Marsili (2001) The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics Edward Elgar Cheltenham, , UK and Northampton, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mazzucato P. Geroski (2002) ArticleTitle‘Learning and Corporate Growth’ Industrial and Corporate change 11 623–644

    Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Nelson S.G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1987) Cours D′économie Politique.

  • K. Pavitt (1984) ArticleTitle‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’ Research Policy 13 343–373 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Quandt (1966) ArticleTitle‘On the Size Distribution of Firms’ American Economic Review 56 416–432

    Google Scholar 

  • W.J. Reed (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Pareto, Zipf and Other Power Laws’ Economics Letters 74 15–19 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00524-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.M. Scherer (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Size Distribution of Profits from Innovation’ Annales D′Économie et de Statistique 49/50 495–516

    Google Scholar 

  • F.M. Scherer D. Harhoff (2000) ArticleTitle‘Technology Policy for a World of Skew-Distributed Outcomes’ Research Policy 29 559–566 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00089-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.M. Scherer D. Harhoff J. Kukies (2000) ArticleTitle‘Uncertainty and the Size Distribution of Rewards from Innovation’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10 175–200 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001910050011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I.H. Silberman (1967) ArticleTitle‘On Lognormality as a Summary Measure of Concentration’ American Economic Review 57 807–831

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Simon (1955) ArticleTitle‘On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions’ Biometrika 28 425–440

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Simon C.P. Bonini (1958) ArticleTitle‘The Size Distribution of Business Firms’ American Economic Review 48 607–617

    Google Scholar 

  • M.H.R. Stanley S.V. Buldyrev S. Havlin R.N. Mantegna M.A. Salinger H.E. Stanley (1995) ArticleTitle‘Zipf Plots and the Size Distribution of Firms’ Economics Letters 49 453–457 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-1765(95)00696-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Steindl (1965) Random Processes and the Growth of Firms Hafner New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Sutton (1997) ArticleTitle‘Gibrat’s Legacy’ Journal of Economic Literature 35 40–59

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Sutton (1998) Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Vining (1976) ArticleTitle‘Autocorrelated Growth Rates and the Pareto Law: A Further Analysis’ Journal of Political Economy 84 369–380

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Weron (200l) ArticleTitle‘Levy-Stable Distributions Revisited: Tail Index >2 Does Not Exclude the Levy-Stable Regime’ International Journal of Modern Physics C 12 209–223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orietta Marsili.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marsili, O. Technology and the Size Distribution of Firms: Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing. Rev Ind Organ 27, 303–328 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-005-5053-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-005-5053-z

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation