Abstract
Empirical studies have shown that the size distribution of firms can be described as a Pareto distribution. However, these studies have focused on large firms and aggregate statistics. Little attention has been placed on the role of technology in shaping firm size distributions. Using a comprehensive dataset of manufacturing firms and the Community Innovation Survey from the Netherlands, the paper investigates the relationship between firm size and technology. It shows that technological factors shape the distribution of firm size, suggesting that the Pareto law is not an invariant property and that technology can constrain the “self-organising” character of industrial economies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.L. Axtell (2001) ArticleTitle‘Zipf Distribution of US Firm Sizes’ Science 293 1818–1820 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1062081
P. Bak (1997) How Nature Works Oxford University Press Oxford, Oxford, UK and New York, US
G. Bottazzi G. Dosi M. Lippi F. Pammolli M. Riccaboni (2001) ArticleTitle‘Innovation and Corporate Growth in the Evolution of the Drug Industry’ International Journal of Industrial Organization 19 1161–1187 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00068-6
S. Breschi F. Malerba L. Orsenigo (2000) ArticleTitle‘Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation’ Economic Journal 110 388–410 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00530
M. Buchanan (1997) ArticleTitle‘One Law to Rule Them All’ New Scientist magazine 156 30
L. Cabral J. Mata (2003) ArticleTitle‘On the Evolution of the Firm Size Distribution: Facts and Theory’ American Economic Review 93 1075–1990
R.E. Caves (1998) ArticleTitle‘Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms’ Journal of Economic Literature 36 1947–1982
W.M. Cohen (1995) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovative Activities’ P. Stoneman (Eds) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change Basil Blackwell Oxford 182–264
Cohen, W. M., and R. C. Levin (1989) ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in R. Schmalensee and R. Willing (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 1060–1107.
W.M. Cohen R.C. Levin D.C. Mowery (1987) ArticleTitle‘Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Re-Examination’ The Journal of Industrial Economics 35 543–565
G. Dosi (1982) ArticleTitle‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change’ Research Policy 11 147–162 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
G. Dosi (1988) ArticleTitle‘Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’ Journal of Economic Literature 26 1120–1171
G. Dosi O. Marsili L. Orsenigo R. Salvatore (1995) ArticleTitle‘Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of Industrial Structures’ Small Business Economics 7 411–436 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01112463
P.A. Geroski (1994) Market Structure, Corporate Performance, and Innovative Activity Oxford University Press New York
R. Gibrat (1931) Les Inégalités Économiques Sirey Paris
P. Gopikrishnan V. Plerou L.A.N. Amaral M. Meyer H.E. Stanley (1999) ArticleTitle‘Scaling of the Distribution of Fluctuations of Financial Market Indices’ Physical Review E 60 5305–5316 Occurrence Handle10.1103/PhysRevE.60.5305
M. Gort S. Klepper (1982) ArticleTitle‘Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations’ Economic Journal 92 630–653
W.H. Greene (2000) Econometric Analysis Prentice-Hall International Upper Saddle River, NJ
M. Henrekson D. Johansson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Institutional Effects on the Evolution of the Size Distribution of Firms’ Small Business Economics 12 11–23 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008002330051
B.M. Hill (1975) ArticleTitle‘A Simple General Approach to Inference About the Tail of a Distribution’ The Annals of Statistics 3 1163–1174
Y. Ijiri H. Simon (1971) ArticleTitle‘Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions on Business Firm Concentration’ Journal of Political Economy 79 314–322
Y. Ijiri H. Simon (1974) ArticleTitle‘Interpretations of Departures from the Pareto Curve Firm-Size Distributions’ Journal of Political Economy 82 315–331
Ijiri Y., Simon H. (1977). Skew Distributions and the Sizes of Business Firms. Amsterdam: North-Holland, New York.
S. Katz (1999) ArticleTitle‘The Self-Similar Science System’ Research Policy 28 501–517 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00010-4
P.R. Krugman (1995) ArticleTitle‘Innovation and Agglomeration: Two Parables Suggested by City-Size Distributions’ Japan and the World Economy 7 371–390
P.R. Krugman (1996) The Self-Organizing Economy Blackwell Cambridge, MA
J.E. Kwoka (1982) ArticleTitle‘Regularity and Diversity in Firm Size Distributions in U.S. Industries’ Journal of Economics and Business 34 391–395 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0148-6195(82)90045-5
R.C. Levin W.M. Cohen D.C. Mowery (1985) ArticleTitle‘R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses’ Issues in the Economics of R&D 75 20–24
J.A.F. Machado J. Mata (2000) ArticleTitle‘Box-Cox Quantile Regression and the Distribution of Firm Sizes’ Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 253–274 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1099-1255(200005/06)15:3<253::AID-JAE559>3.0.CO;2-8
O. Marsili (2001) The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics Edward Elgar Cheltenham, , UK and Northampton, MA, USA
M. Mazzucato P. Geroski (2002) ArticleTitle‘Learning and Corporate Growth’ Industrial and Corporate change 11 623–644
R.R. Nelson S.G. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
Pareto, V. (1987) Cours D′économie Politique.
K. Pavitt (1984) ArticleTitle‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’ Research Policy 13 343–373 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
R.E. Quandt (1966) ArticleTitle‘On the Size Distribution of Firms’ American Economic Review 56 416–432
W.J. Reed (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Pareto, Zipf and Other Power Laws’ Economics Letters 74 15–19 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00524-9
F.M. Scherer (1998) ArticleTitle‘The Size Distribution of Profits from Innovation’ Annales D′Économie et de Statistique 49/50 495–516
F.M. Scherer D. Harhoff (2000) ArticleTitle‘Technology Policy for a World of Skew-Distributed Outcomes’ Research Policy 29 559–566 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00089-X
F.M. Scherer D. Harhoff J. Kukies (2000) ArticleTitle‘Uncertainty and the Size Distribution of Rewards from Innovation’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10 175–200 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001910050011
I.H. Silberman (1967) ArticleTitle‘On Lognormality as a Summary Measure of Concentration’ American Economic Review 57 807–831
H. Simon (1955) ArticleTitle‘On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions’ Biometrika 28 425–440
H. Simon C.P. Bonini (1958) ArticleTitle‘The Size Distribution of Business Firms’ American Economic Review 48 607–617
M.H.R. Stanley S.V. Buldyrev S. Havlin R.N. Mantegna M.A. Salinger H.E. Stanley (1995) ArticleTitle‘Zipf Plots and the Size Distribution of Firms’ Economics Letters 49 453–457 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0165-1765(95)00696-D
J. Steindl (1965) Random Processes and the Growth of Firms Hafner New York
J. Sutton (1997) ArticleTitle‘Gibrat’s Legacy’ Journal of Economic Literature 35 40–59
J. Sutton (1998) Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History MIT Press Cambridge, MA
D.R. Vining (1976) ArticleTitle‘Autocorrelated Growth Rates and the Pareto Law: A Further Analysis’ Journal of Political Economy 84 369–380
R. Weron (200l) ArticleTitle‘Levy-Stable Distributions Revisited: Tail Index >2 Does Not Exclude the Levy-Stable Regime’ International Journal of Modern Physics C 12 209–223
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marsili, O. Technology and the Size Distribution of Firms: Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing. Rev Ind Organ 27, 303–328 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-005-5053-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-005-5053-z