Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 1–24 | Cite as

Child care and parent labor force participation: a review of the research literature

  • Taryn W. MorrisseyEmail author


Early care and education (ECE) enables parental employment and provides a context for child development. Theory suggests that lower child care costs, through subsidized care or the provision of free or low-cost arrangements, would increase the use of ECE and parents’ employment and work hours. This paper reviews the research literature examining the effects of child care costs and availability on parental employment. In general, research suggests that reduced out-of-pocket costs for ECE and increased availability of public ECE increases ECE attendance among young children, and has positive impacts on mothers’ labor force participation and work hours. However, there is considerable heterogeneity in findings. Among U.S. studies that report the elasticity of employment to ECE price, estimates range from −0.025 to −1.1, with estimates clustering near 0.05–0.25. This indicates that a 10 % reduction in the price of child care would lead to a 0.25–11 % increase in maternal employment, likely near 0.5–2.5 %. In general, studies using more recent data or data from non-U.S. countries find smaller elasticities than those using U.S. data from the 1990s. These differences may be due to historical and cross-national differences in ECE attendance, labor force attachment, and educational attainment among mothers with young children, as well as heterogeneity in the methodological approaches and data used across studies. More research in the U.S. using contemporary data is needed, particularly given recent changes in U.S. ECE policy.


Child care Early education Parent labor force participation Child care subsidies Child care costs Child care availability 

JEL Classification

J13 J22 



This literature review was supported by the Division of Human Services Policy in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policies of the HHS or any agency of the Federal Government.

Supplementary material

11150_2016_9331_MOESM1_ESM.docx (122 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 121 kb)


  1. Bainbridge, J., Meyers, M. K., & Waldfogel, J. (2003). Child care reform and the employment of lone mothers. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 771–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, M. (2011). Innis lecture: Universal early childhood interventions: What is the evidence base? Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(4), 1069–1105. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01668.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, M., Gruber, J., & Milligan, K. (2008). Universal child care, maternal labor supply, and family well-being. Journal of Political Economy, 116(4), 709–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, W. S. (2011). Effectiveness of early educational intervention. Science, 333(6045), 975–978. doi: 10.1126/science.1204534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum, C. L. (2002). A dynamic analysis of the effect of child care costs on the work decisions of low-income mothers with infants. Demography, 39(1), 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlinski, S., & Galiani, S. (2007). The effect of a large expansion of pre-primary school facilities on preschool attendance and maternal employment. Labour Economics, 14(3), 665–680. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2007.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berlinski, S., Galiani, S., & McEwan, P. J. (2009). Preschool and maternal labour market outcomes: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 59(2), 313–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, D. M. (2001). The child care problem: An economic analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Blau, D. M., & Currie, J. (2006a). Preschool, day care, and after-school care: Who’s minding the kids? Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2, 1163–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blau, D. M., & Currie, J. (2006b). Who’s minding the kids? Preschool, day care, and afterschool care. In Handbook of the economics of education. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). Changes in the labor supply behavior of married women: 1980–2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(3), 393–438. doi: 10.1086/513416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blau, D. M., & Tekin, E. (2007). The determinants and consequences of child care subsidies for single mothers in the USA. Journal of Population Economics, 20, 719–741. doi: 10.1007/s00148-005-0022-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brilli, Y., Boca, D., & Pronzato, C. D. (2016). Does child care availability play a role in maternal employment and children’s development? Evidence from Italy. Review of Economics of the Household, 14(1), 27–51. doi: 10.1007/s11150-013-9227-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brilli, Y., Del Boca, D., & Pronzato, C. (2011). Exploring the impacts of public childcare on mothers and children in Italy: Does rationing play a role? Working Paper (5918). Retrieved from
  16. Brooks-Gunn, J., McCormick, M. C., Shapiro, S., Benasich, A., & Black, G. W. (1994). The effects of early education intervention on maternal employment, public assistance, and health insurance: The infant health and development program. American Journal of Public Health, 84(6), 924–931. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.84.6.924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Employment characteristics of families summary. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from
  18. Cannon, J. S., Jacknowitz, A., & Painter, G. (2006). Is full better than half? Examining the longitudinal effects of full-day kindergarten attendance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(2), 299–321. doi: 10.1002/pam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cascio, E. U. (2009). Maternal labor supply and the introduction of kindergartens into american public schools. Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 140–170. doi: 10.1353/jhr.2009.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cascio, E. U., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2013). The impacts of expanding access to high-quality preschool (pp. 127–178). Fall: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Child Care Aware. (2014). Parents and the high cost of child care. VA: Arlington.Google Scholar
  22. Compton, J., & Pollak, R. A. (2014). Family proximity, childcare, and women’s labor force attachment. Journal of Urban Economics, 79, 72–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2013.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Connelly, R., & Kimmel, J. (2003). The effect of child care costs on the employment and welfare recipiency of single mothers. Southern Economic Journal, 69(3), 498–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Council of Economic Advisors. (2014). Nine facts about American families and work. Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  25. Crosby, D. A., Gennetian, L. A., & Huston, A. C. (2005). Child care assistance policies can affect the use of center-based care for children in low-income families. Applied Developmental Science, 9, 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Datta Gupta, N., Smith, N., & Verner, M. (2008). Perspective article: The impact of Nordic countries’ family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children. Review of Economics of the Household, 6(1), 65–89. doi: 10.1007/s11150-007-9023-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de la Cruz Toledo, E. (2015). Universal preschool and mothers’ employment. New York, NY: Columbia Population Research Center Working Paper.Google Scholar
  28. Del Boca, D. (2002). The effect of child care and part time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. Journal of Population Economics, 15, 549–573. doi: 10.1007/s001480100089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Del Boca, D., Pasqua, S., & Pronzato, C. (2009). Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: A European perspective. Oxford Economic Papers, 61(Supplement 1), i147–i171. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpn046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Doiron, D., & Kalb, G. (2002). Demand for childcare services and labour supply in Australian families. The Australian Economic Review, 35(2), 204–213. doi: 10.1111/1467-8462.00237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Doiron, D., & Kalb, G. (2005). Demands for child care and household labour supply in Australia. Economic Record, 81, 215–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2005.00257.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fitzpatrick, M. D. (2010). Preschoolers enrolled and mothers at work? The effects of universal prekindergarten. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(1), 51–85. doi: 10.1086/648666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fitzpatrick, M. D. (2012). Revising our thinking about the relationship between maternal labor supply and preschool. Journal of Human Resources, 47(3), 583–612. doi: 10.1353/jhr.2012.0026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Forry, N. D., & Hofferth, S. L. (2011). Maintaining work: The influence of child care subsidies on child care-related work disruptions. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 346–368. doi: 10.1177/0192513X10384467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Francesconi, M., & van der Klaauw, W. (2007). The socioeconomic consequences of “In-Work” benefit reform for British lone mothers. Journal of Human Resources, 42(1), 1–31. doi: 10.3368/jhr.XLII.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Galinsky, E., Bond, J. T., Sakai, K., Kim, S., & Giuntoli, N. (2008). National study of employers. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Gelbach, J. B. (2002). Public schooling for young children and maternal labor supply. American Economic Review, 92(1), 307–322. doi: 10.1257/000282802760015748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gennetian, L. A., Crosby, D. A., Huston, A. C., & Lowe, E. D. (2004). Can child care assistance in welfare and employment programs support the employment of low-income families? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(4), 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Geyer, J., Haan, P., & Wrohlich, K. (2014). The effects of family policy on mothers’ labor supply: Combining evidence from a structural model and a natural experiment. Labour Economics, 36, 84–98. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2015.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gordon, R. A., & Högnäs, R. S. (2006). The best laid plans: Expectations, preferences, and stability of child-care arrangements. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(2), 373–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00259.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gordon, R. A., Kaestner, R., & Korenman, S. (2008). Child care and work absences: Trade-offs by type of care. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(1), 239–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00475.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gormley, W. T., Gayer, T., Phillips, D. A., & Dawson, B. (2005). The effects of universal pre-K on cognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 872–884. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gornick, J. C., & Meyers, M. (2003). Families that work: Policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  44. Ha, Y., Magnuson, K. A., & Ybarra, M. (2012). Patterns of child care subsidy receipt and the stability of child care. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9), 1834–1844. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haan, P., & Wrohlich, K. (2011). Can child care policy encourage employment and fertility? Evidence from a structural model. Labour Economics, 18(4), 498–512. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2010.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Halpern, D. F. (2005). Psychology at the intersection of work and family: Recommendations for employers, working families, and policymakers. American Psychologist, 60, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Han, W.-J., & Waldfogel, J. (2001). Child care costs and women’s employment: A comparison of single and married mothers with pre-school-aged children. Social Science Quarterly, 82(3), 552–568. doi: 10.1111/0038-4941.00042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hanappi, T. P., & Müllbacher, S. (2013). Tax incentives and family labor supply in Austria. Review of Economics of the Household,. doi: 10.1007/s11150-013-9230-9.Google Scholar
  49. Hardoy, I., & Schøne, P. (2013). Enticing even higher female labor supply: The impact of cheaper day care. Review of Economics of the Household, 123, 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s11150-013-9215-8.Google Scholar
  50. Havnes, T., & Mogstad, M. (2010). Is universal child care leveling the playing field? Evidence from non-linear difference-in-differences. Journal of Public Economics. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.007.
  51. Havnes, T., & Mogstad, M. (2011a). Money for nothing? Universal child care and maternal employment. Journal of Public Economics, 95(11–12), 1455–1465. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Havnes, T., & Mogstad, M. (2011b). No child left behind: Subsidized child care and children’s long-run outcomes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(2), 97–129.Google Scholar
  53. Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2004). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Invest in Kids Working Group.Google Scholar
  54. Herbst, C. M. (2010). The labor supply effects of child care costs and wages in the presence of subsidies and the earned income tax credit. Review of Economics of the Household, 8, 199–230. doi: 10.1007/s11150-009-9078-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Herbst, C. M. (2013). Universal child care, maternal employment, and children’s long-run outcomes: Evidence from the U.S. Lanham Act of 1940 (No. 7846). Retrieved from
  56. Herbst, C. M., & Tekin, E. (2011). Child care subsidies and childhood obesity. Review of Economics of the Household, 9, 349–378. doi: 10.1007/s11150-010-9087-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Herbst, C. M., & Tekin, E. (2016). The impact of child-care subsidies on child development: Evidence from geographic variation in the distance to social service agencies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(1), 94–116. doi: 10.1002/pam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hofferth, S. L. (1999). Child care, maternal employment and public policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 563, 20–38. doi: 10.1177/000271629956300102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hofferth, S., & Collins, N. (2000). Child care and employment turnover. Population Research and Policy Review, 19(4), 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Johnson, A. D., Martin, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2013). Child-care subsidies and school readiness in kindergarten. Child Development, 84(5), 1806–1822. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Johnson, A. D., Martin, A., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Child-care subsidies and child-care choices over time. Child Development, 85(5), 1843–1851. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12254.Google Scholar
  62. Kalb, G. (2009). Children, labour supply and child care: Challenges for empirical analysis. Australian Economic Review, 42(3), 276–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2009.00545.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kalb, G., & Thoresen, T. O. (2010). A comparison of family policy designs of Australia and Norway using microsimulation models. Review of Economics of the Household, 8(2), 255–287. doi: 10.1007/s11150-009-9076-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kreyenfeld, M., & Hank, K. (2000). Does the availability of child care influence the employment of mothers? Findings from western Germany. Population Research and Policy Review, 19(4), 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Laughlin, L. (2013). Who’s minding the kids? Child care arrangements: Spring 2011 (Vol. 2009). U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  66. Lefebvre, P., & Merrigan, P. (2008). Child-care policy and the labor supply of mothers with young children: A natural experiment from Canada. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(3), 519–548. doi: 10.1086/587760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lefebvre, P., Merrigan, P., & Roy-desrosiers, F. (2011). Quebec’s childcare universal low fees policy 10 years after: Effects, costs, and benefits. Montreal: Cirpee Working Paper 11-01.Google Scholar
  68. Lefebvre, P., Merrigan, P., & Verstraete, M. (2009). Dynamic labour supply effects of childcare subsidies: Evidence from a Canadian natural experiment on low-fee universal child care. Labour Economics, 16(5), 490–502. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Li, W., Farkas, G., Duncan, G. J., Burchinal, M. R., & Vandell, D. L. (2013). Timing of high-quality child care and cognitive, language, and preacademic development. Developmental Psychology, 49(8), 1440–1451. doi: 10.1037/a0030613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Loft, L. T. G., & Hogan, D. (2014). Does care matter? Care capital and mothers’ time to paid employment. Journal of Population Research, 31(3), 237–252. doi: 10.1007/s12546-014-9133-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mahringer, H., & Zulehner, C. (2015). Child-care costs and mothers’ employment rates: An empirical analysis for Austria. Review of Economics of the Household, 13(4), 837–870. doi: 10.1007/s11150-013-9222-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Masse, L. N., & Barnett, W. S. (2002). A benefit cost analysis of the abecedarian early childhood intervention. New Brunswick, NJ. Retrieved from
  73. Matos, K., & Galinsky, E. (2014). National study of employers. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  74. McCartney, S., & Laughlin, L. (2011). Child care costs in the current population survey’s annual social and economic supplement (CPS ASEC): A comparison to SIPP (No. 2011-1). U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  75. Meyers, M. (1993). Child care in JOBS employment and training programs: What difference does quality make? Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Meyers, M. K., Heintze, R., & Wolf, D. A. (2002). Child care subsidies and the employment of welfare recipients. Demography, 39, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Michalopoulos, C. (2010). Effects of reducing child care subsidy copayments in Washington State. OPRE 2011-2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  78. Michalopoulos, C., Lundquist, E., & Castells, N. (2010). The effects of child care subsidies for moderate-income families in Cook County, Illinois. Final Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  79. Milkie, M. A., Nomaguchi, K. M., & Denny, K. (2015). Does mom time matter? Does the amount of time mothers spend with children or adolescents matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1–36. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Morrissey, T. W., & Warner, M. E. (2007). Why early care and education deserves as much attention, or more, than prekindergarten alone. Applied Developmental Science, 11, 57–70. doi: 10.1080/10888690701384897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Morrissey, T. W., & Warner, M. E. (2011). An exploratory study of the impacts of an employer-supported child care program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(3), 344–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. National Institute for Early Education Research. (2014). Florida voluntary prekindergarten program. Retrieved from
  83. NICHD ECCRN. (2006). Child care effect sizes for the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. American Psychologist, 61, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. NSECE Team. (2014). Household search for and perceptions of early care and education: Initial findings from the national survey of early care and education (NSECE) (OPRE Report No. 2014-55a). Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  85. OECD. (2015). Maternal employment rates. Paris, France. Retrieved from
  86. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Planning and Evaluation. (2015). Estimates of child care eligibility and receipt for fiscal year 2011. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  87. Phillips, D. A., & Adams, G. (2001). Child care and our youngest children. The Future of Children, 11, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Phillips, D. A., & Lowenstein, A. E. (2011). Early care, education, and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 483–500. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Posadas, J., & Vidal-Fernandez, M. (2013). Grandparents’ childcare and female labor force participation. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2, 14. doi: 10.1186/2193-9004-2-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ruhm, C. J. (2011). Policies to assist parents with young children. The Future of Children, 21(2), 37–68. doi: 10.1353/foc.2011.0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ryan, R. M., Johnson, A., Rigby, E., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2011). The impact of child care subsidy use on child care quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(3), 320–331. Retrieved from
  92. Schlosser, A. (2011). Public preschool and the labor supply of Arab mothers: Evidence from a natural experiment. Working Paper. Tel Aviv University. Retrieved from
  93. Stoney, L., Mitchell, A., & Warner, M. E. (2006). Smarter reform: Moving beyond single program solutions to an early care and education system. Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society, 37, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tekin, E. (2007). Childcare subsidies, wages, and employment of single mothers. Journal of Human Resources, 42, 453–487. Retrieved from
  95. Vandell, D. L., McCartney, K., Owen, M. T., Booth, C., & Clarke-Stewart, A. (2003). Variations in child care by grandparents during the first three years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 375–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00375.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vandell, D. L., & Wolfe, B. (2000). Child care quality: Does it matter and does it need to beimproved?. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  97. Viitanen, T. K. (2005). Cost of childcare and female employment in the UK. Labour, 19(SUPPL. 1), 149–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9914.2005.00325.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Viitanen, T. K. (2011). Child care voucher and labour market behaviour: Experimental evidence from Finland. Applied Economics, 43(23), 3203–3212. doi: 10.1080/00036840903508346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Weiland, C., & Yoshikawa, H. (2013). Impacts of a prekindergarten program on children’s mathematics, language, literacy, executive function, and emotional skills. Child Development, 84(6), 2112–2130. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Yoshikawa, H., Weiland, C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Burchinal, M. R., Espinosa, L. M., Gormley, W. T., et al. (2013). Investing in our future: The evidence base on preschool education investing in our future: The evidence base on preschool education. Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  101. Ziliak, J. P., Hokayem, C., & Hardy, B. (2008). Child care subsidies and the economic well-being of recipient families: A survey and implications for Kentucky. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Center for Poverty Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Administration and Policy, School of Public AffairsAmerican UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations