Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is caring for older parents detrimental to women’s mental health? The role of the European North–South gradient

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decades, both the lengthening of life expectancy and an accentuated decline in birth rates have reduced the consistency of the younger generational cohorts. Due to an ageing population, the burden of caregiving is expected to intensify in the next quarter of the century in Europe, especially for mature women. This paper investigates the impact of the provision of constant care for older parents on the mental health of adult daughters, between the ages of 50 and 75, living in different European countries. Data is drawn from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Information on mental health status is provided by Euro-D depression scale, a measure of depression standardized across European countries. We focus on differences in the effects according to the North–South gradient: we test whether the relationship between informal caregiving and mental health differs across European macro-regions. Our results, robust under different specifications of the propensity score model, reveal a clear North–South gradient: the provision of informal care has a negative and significant impact on daughters’ mental health in the Mediterranean countries only, where the amount of resources allocated to the Long Term Care is minimal and the local system of health and social services for the elderly lacks the necessary structures to meet the increasing demand for eldercare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The target population of SHARE is defined both in terms of households and in terms of individuals. The interviewers observed families with at least one person and the individuals born before 1954 who speak the official language of the country and who, during the time of the survey, do not live abroad or in an institution like a prison, as well as their spouse/partner, independently of age.

  2. We have included this age cut-off, according to the extant literature, since parents who need constant assistance generally have children aged 50 or over and equally, children who are over 75 are less likely to still have parents to care for, or may be too old themselves to provide care (see also Grundy and Henretta 2006; Rubin and White-Means 2009; Coe and Van Houtven 2009).

  3. Literature suggests different ways of classifying European countries according to the reported characteristics. Consistently with the data availability, we adopted a care regime cluster approach that falls midway between the traditional Esping-Anderson approach (1990) and the countries classification carried out by Bettio and Plantenga (2004). Our clustering approach was also adopted by Crespo and Mira (2010) who used SHARE data.

  4. Data for Italy and Greece LTC expenditure were missing since they are not included in the OECD data we used (see Fig. 1). .

  5. In Sweden for example the children’s legal obligation to care for their parents has been abolished. The municipality is solely responsible for elderly assistance (EOP 2010).

  6. The issue of informal caregivers’ training is very important and well debated. Southern countries in particular lack these kind of services, with the consequence that, without receiving any preparation on this topic, the carers often feel inadequate in coping with the elderly personal care.

  7. The "parent-sample" provides comprehensive information reported by the elderly parents themselves, among which their access to different sources of care, in addition to informal care provided by their daughter (see also p. 14).

  8. Prince et al.(1999) found that reporting four or more symptoms on the EURO-D scale is the optimal cut-off point in predicting clinical depression. Dewey and Prince (2005) suggested to set a threshold at a score of 4 and defined clinically significant depression as a EURO-D score equal or greater than 4. Therefore, we used 4 symptoms as a threshold – i.e. dichotomising the EURO-D scale. We carried out a sensitivity analysis re-running the model using the whole EURO-D scale to examine whether informal care affects the total number of depressive symptoms. This construction did not significantly affect the results: the ATT still results significant for the Southern European macro area only. Providing any type of care to older parents has a positive and significant effect of 0.18 on the total number of depressive symptoms. For the sake of brevity, the results of the sensitivity analysis are not included but they are available on request.

  9. In order to construct the occupational prestige scale we employed the STATA command “iskotrei” which transforms ISCO-88 codes into Treiman's SIOPS scale (Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale) (Ganzeboom and Treiman 1996).

  10. Coe and Van Houtven (2009) claimed: “a certain threshold of health may be needed before becoming a caregiver, making it very important to control for initial health to understand the effects of informal care on health over time”.

  11. Using a lagged dependent variable in a cross-sectional data is an alternative way of addressing the unobserved characteristics. The main assumption in a lagged dependent variable approach is that the majority of the same unobserved characteristics affects both current and previous (i.e. lagged) dependent variables. Thus, including a lagged dependent variable in a cross-sectional regression model, makes it easier to account for the unobserved factors that cause the current differences in the dependent variable, which is not feasible in a pure cross-sectional data analysis (see Wooldridge 2000).

  12. The estimation was carried out using the PSMATCH2 program for STATA developed by Leuven and Sianesi (2003).

  13. All observed controls used in the propensity score matching analysis satisfy the balancing property again (see Table 6).

  14. Respondents fill in the drop-off questionnaire only once. Individuals who weren’t interviewed in wave 1 were asked to answer the drop-off questionnaire in wave 2. Our sample includes, however, women who were interviewed for the first time in wave 1 and again in wave 2. Hence, the indicator of attitudes towards parent’s care refers to wave 1. We assumed that the attitude towards care did not change between wave 1 and 2.

  15. All observed controls used in the robustness checks satisfy the balancing property (see Tables 7 and 9).

  16. We performed additional robustness checks displayed in Online Appendix.

References

  • Alessie, R., Angelini, V., & Pasini, G. (2014). Is it true love? Altruism versus exchange in time and money transfers. De Economist, 162, 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirkhanyan, A. A., & Wolf, D. A. (2006). Parent care and the stress process: Findings from panel data. The Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, 248–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averett, S. L., Argys, L. M., & Sorkin, J. (2013). In sickness and in health: An examination of relationship status and health using data from the Canadian National Public Health Survey. Review Economics of the Household, 11, 599–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. C., Marshall, N. L., & Singer, J. D. (1992). Job experiences over time, multiple roles, and women’s mental health: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 634–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F., & Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10(1), 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F. C. (2004). Becoming an adult in Europe. Demographic Research, 15–44 (special collection 3, article 2 published 17 April 2004).

  • Billari, F. C., & Kholer, H. P. (2006). Patterns of low and lowest fertility in Europe. Population Studies, 58(2), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, K., Lindgren, B., & Lundborg, P. (2008a). Your next of kin or your own career?: Caring and working among the 50 + of Europe. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 718–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, K., Lindgren, B., & Lundborg, P. (2008b). Informal and formal care among single-living elder in Europe. Health Economics, 17, 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsang, E. (2009). Does informal care from children to their older parents substitute for formal care in Europe? Journal of Health Economics, 28, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookwala, J. (2009). The impact of parent care on marital quality and well-being in adult daughters and sons. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64B(3), 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Frank, J. (2002). Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends? Economic Journal, 112(480), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börsch-Supan, A., & Jürges, H. (Eds.). (2005). The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe—Methodology. Mannheim: MEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2006). Informal care and the division of end-of-life transfers. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 191–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22, 31–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callegaro, L., & Pasini, G. (2008). Social interaction effects in an inter-generational model of informal care giving. Netspar discussion paper 023.

  • Cannuscio, C. C., Colditz, G. A., Rimm, E. B., Berkman, L. F., Jones, C. P., & Kawachi, I. (2004). Employment status, social ties, and caregivers’ mental health. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 1247–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrieri, V., Di Novi, C., Jacobs, R., & Robone, S. (2014). Insecure, sick and unhappy? Well-being consequences of temporary employment contracts. In S. W. Polachek, K. Tatsiramos (Eds.), Factors affecting worker well being. Research in labor economics (Vol. 40, ch. 4).

  • Coe, N., & Van Houtven, C. H. (2009). Caring for mom and neglecting yourself? The health effects of caring for an older parent. Health Economics, 18, 991–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, L., & Mira, P. (2010). Caregiving to elderly parents and employment status of European mature women. Madrid: WP CEMFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, A., & Patsios, D. (1999). Formal and informal community care to older adults: Comparative analysis of the United States and Great Britain. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 20, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, M. E., & Prince, M. J. (2005). Mental Health. In Axel Börsch-Supan & Hendrik Jürges (Eds.), Health, ageing and retirement in Europe—First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (pp. 108–117). Mannheim: MEA Eigenverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Novi, C., Jacobs, R., & Migheli, M. (2015). The quality of life of female informal caregivers: From Scandinavia to the Mediterranean Sea. European Journal of Population, 31, 1–27. doi:10.1007/s10680-014-9336-7.

  • El Habhoubi, E. (2012). The effect of caregiving on employment and mental health examined for midlife European citizens. Netspar thesis. http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=129941.

  • EOP (European Overview Paper). (2010). Informal care in the long-term care system.

  • Esping-Andersen G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. London: Polity.

  • Eurostat. (2010). Demography report 2010. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/.

  • Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. G. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research, 25, 201–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammenos, S. (2005). Implications of demographic ageing in the enlarged EU in the domains of quality of life, health promotion and health care. Studies on the policy implications of demographic changes in national and community policies, Lot 5 Contract VC/2004/0076 no S12.396079, Brussels.

  • Grundy, E., & Henretta, J. C. (2006). Between elderly parents and adult children: A new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ‘sandwich generation’. Ageing and Society, 26, 707–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, M. (2002). Transitions to informal care in Great Britain during the 1990s. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 579–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., & Wolfe, B. (2002). Health inequality between black and white women. Discussion paper no. 1251-02. Institute for Research on Poverty.

  • Ichino, A., Mealli, F., & Nannicini, T. (2008). From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: What can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 305–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 5–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalwij, A., Pasini, G., & Wu, M. (2014). Homecare for the Elderly: Family, friends and the state. Review of Economics of the Household, 12, 379–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Kim, C., Park, J., & Kawachi, I. (2008). Is precarious employment damaging to self-rated health? Results of propensity score matching methods, using longitudinal data in South Korea. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 1982–1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotsadam, A. (2011). Does informal care impede employment? The case of European welfare states. Gothenburg: WP Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Statistical Software Components S432001: Boston College Department of Economics, Revised 19 July 2012.

  • Lin, W. F., Chen, L. H., & Li, T. (2012). Adult children’s caregiver burden and depression: The moderating roles of parent–child relationship satisfaction and feedback from others. Journal of Happiness Studies.

  • Mortensen, J., Spiess, C. K., Katharin, C., Schneider, T., Costa-Font, J., & Concepcio, P. (2004). Health care and female employment: A potential conflict. European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes, Occasional paper 6/April.

  • O’Donnell, O., Van Doorslaer, E., Wagstaff, A., & Lindelow, M. (2008). Analysing health equity using household survey data. Washington DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Help wanted? Providing and paying for long term care. http://www.oecd.org/els/healthpoliciesanddata/47884865.pdf.

  • Pavalco, E. K., & Artis, J. (1997). Women’s caregiving and paid work: Causal relationships in late midlife. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science, 52, 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzin, L., & Steinberg-Schone, B. (1999). Intergenerational household formation, female labor supply and informal caregiving: A bargaining approach. The Journal of Human Resources, 34, 475–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. J., Beekman, A. T., Deeg, D. J., Fuhrer, R., Kivela, S. L., Lawlor, B. A., et al. (1999). Depression symptoms in late life assessed using the EURO-D scale: Effect of age, gender and marital status in 14 European centres. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24, 203–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, S. C., et al. (2008). Safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses: Vol. 1. In Hughes R. F. (Ed.), AHRQ publication no. 08-0043. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

  • Riedel, M., & Kraus, M. (2011). The organization of formal long-term care for the elderly: Results from the 21 European country studies in the ANCIEN project. Report: Enepri Research. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, L. D., & Bowen, C. (2005). The Sandwich Generation: Challenges and coping strategies of multigenerational families. Family Journal, 13, 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, R. M., & White-Mean, S. I. (2009). Informal caregiving: Dilemmas of sandwiched caregivers. J Fam Econ Issue, 30, 252–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasa, S., Mestres, J. (2005). Women’s employment and the adult caring burden. DemoSoc working paper 2005–07.

  • Shulz, R., & Beach, S. R. (1999). Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the caregiver health effect study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 2215–2219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulz, R., & Sherwood, P. R. (2008). Physical and mental effects of family caregiving. American Journal of Nursing, 108, 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M., Gans, D., & Yang, F. M. (2006). Intergenerational support to ageing parents. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1068–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, F. A., Picone, G., & Hoerger, T. J. (1997). The supply of children’s time to disabled older parents. Economic Inquiry, 35, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, F. A., Zhang, H. H., & Wang, J. (2002). Upstream intergenerational transfers. Southern Economic Journal, 69, 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPRU (Social Policy Research Unit) University of York. (2009). Care Provision within families and its socio-economic impact on care providers. Working paper no. EU 2342, Report for the European Commission DG EMPL Negotiated Procedure VT/2007/114.

  • Vitaliano, P. P., Zhang, J., & Scanlan, J. M. (2003). Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bullettin, 129, 946–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. T., Pratt, C. C., & Eddy, L. (1995). Informal caregiving to aging family members: A critical review. Family Relations, 44, 402–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2000). The initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. East Lansing: Michigan State University.

  • Zantomio, F. (2013). Older people’s participation in extra-cost disability benefits. Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, 32, 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier draft of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Italian Health Economics Association (AIES), Trento, Italy, at the International Health Economics Association (iHEA) annual conference, Milan, Italy, at the European Federation of Retired and Older Persons (FERPA) Annual Conference, Bruxelles, Belgium, at XII Workshop of Public Economics at Regional and Local Level (PEARL), Alessandria, Italy, and at seminars at the University of Lugano, Marche Polytechnic University, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. The authors thank the conference and seminar participants for their detailed and helpful comments. The authors also thank Andrea Albarea, Silvia Balia, Vincenzo Carrieri, Alberto Cassone, Claudio Lucifora, Fabrizio Mazzonna, Giacomo Pasini, Elisabetta Trevisan, Francesca Zantomio for useful suggestions. Financial support provided by Fondazione FarmaFactoring (Milan) for this research project is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also wish to thank the editors and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cinzia Di Novi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 85 kb)

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Tables 11, 12 and 13.

Table 11 Probit model for the propensity score matching Northern Europe (baseline model—Section 4)
Table 12 Probit model for the propensity score matching Central Europe (baseline model—Section 4)
Table 13 Probit model for the propensity score matching Southern Europe (baseline model—Section 4)

Appendix 2

See Tables 14 and 15.

Table 14 Results of covariate balancing tests—attitudes towards care model
Table 15 Average treatment effect on the treated (ATT)—attitudes towards care

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brenna, E., Di Novi, C. Is caring for older parents detrimental to women’s mental health? The role of the European North–South gradient. Rev Econ Household 14, 745–778 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-015-9296-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-015-9296-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation