Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 223–238 | Cite as

Food assistance and family routines in three American Cities

  • David C. RibarEmail author
  • Daniela Zapata
Article

Abstract

The major food assistance programs in the United States—the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the National School Lunch Program, the School Breakfast Program, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children—all share the fundamental goal of helping needy and vulnerable people obtain access to nutritious foods that they might not otherwise be able to afford, but the programs may also affect households’ well-being in other ways. In this study, we examine how the receipt of public and private food assistance is associated with regular family routines, using longitudinal data on low-income families with children from the Three City Study. Estimates from fixed-effects regression models indicate that WIC participation is positively associated with homework routines and consistent bed times. However, receipt of other assistance is not strongly associated with family routines.

Keywords

Family routines Food assistance Three City Study 

JEL Classification

I3 J1 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Economic Research Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) under Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Program Cooperative Agreement no. 58-4000-2-0073. They thank Chuck Courtemanche, Christian Gregory, Chris Ruhm, seminar participants at the Annual Conference of the European Society for Population Economics and at Elon University, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the USDA or of their respective institutions.

References

  1. Becker, G. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coley, R., Lohman, B., Votruba-Drzal, E., Pittman, L., & Chase-Lansdale, P. (2007). Maternal functioning, time, and money: The world of work and welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 721–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crouter, A., & McHale, S. (1993). Temporal rhythms in family life: Seasonal variation in the relation between parental work and family processes. Developmental Psychology, 29, 198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DePolt, R., Moffitt, R., & Ribar, D. (2009). Food stamps, temporary assistance for needy families and food hardships in three American Cities. Pacific Economic Review, 14, 445–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Devault, M. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fiese, B., Foley, K., & Spagnola, M. (2006). Routine and ritual elements in family mealtimes: Contexts for child well-being and family identity. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 111, 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fox, M., Hamilton, W., & Lin, B. (2004). Effects of food assistance and nutrition programs on nutrition and health: vol. 3, Literature Review. Food assistance and Nutrition Research Report no. 19-3. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  8. Greening, L., Stoppelbein, L., Konishi, C., Jordan, S. S., & Moll, G. (2007). Child routines and youths’ adherence to treatment for Type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gronau, R. (1977). Leisure, home production, and work—the theory of the allocation of time revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 29, 1099–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamermesh, D. (2005). Routine. European Economic Review, 49, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (2010). The importance of family dinners IV. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  13. Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2006). Eating among teens: Do family mealtimes make a difference for adolescents’ nutrition? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 111, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nord, M., Coleman-Jensen, A., Andrews, M., & Carlson, S. (2010). Household food security in the United States, 2009. Economic research report no. (ERR-108). Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
  15. Ochs, E., & Shohet, M. (2006). The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 111, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peterson, K., Davison, M., Wahlstrom, K., Himes, J., Stevens, M., Seo, Y., et al. (2004). Fastbreak to learning school breakfast program: A report of the fourth year results, 2002–03. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  17. Ribar, D. (2013). Public policy responses to childhood hunger. Paper commissioned for the National Academy of Sciences, Committee on National Statistics Workshop on Research Gaps—causes and consequences of child food insecurity and hunger.Google Scholar
  18. Ribar, D., & Haldeman, L. (2013). Changes in meal participation, attendance, and test scores associated with the availability of universal-free school breakfasts. Social Service Review, 87, 354–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rose, D. (2007). Food stamps, the thrifty food plan, and meal preparation: The importance of the time dimension for US nutrition policy. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 39, 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Roy, M., Millimet, D., & Tchernis, R. (2012). Federal nutrition programs and childhood obesity: Inside the black box. Review of Economics of the Household, 10, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roy, K., Tubbs, C., & Burton, L. (2004). Don’t have no time: Daily rhythms and the organization of time for low-income families. Family Relations, 53, 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schreier, H., & Chen, E. (2010). Longitudinal relationships between family routines and biological profiles among youth with asthma. Health Psychology, 29, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shemilt, I., O’Brien, M., Thoburn, J., Harvey, I., Belderson, P., Robinson, J., et al. (2003). School breakfast clubs, children and family support. Children and Society, 17, 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Snow, C., & Beals, D. (2006). Mealtime talk that supports literacy development. New directions for child and adolescent development, 111, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Waehrer, G. (2008). The school breakfast program and breakfast consumption. Discussion paper no. 1360-08. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.Google Scholar
  26. Wilde, P., & Ranney, C. (2000). The monthly food stamp cycle: Shopping frequency and food intake decisions in an endogenous switching regression framework. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, 200–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Woodward, J., & Ribar, D. (2012). Is individually-targeted food assistance shared among family members? Food and Nutrition Sciences, 3, 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social ResearchUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.IMPAQ International, LLCWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations