Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 103–130

Effects of parental absence on child labor and school attendance in the Philippines

Article

Abstract

This paper uses longitudinal data from the Philippines to analyze determinants of children’s time allocation. The estimation method takes into account both the simultaneity of time use decisions, by allowing for correlation of residuals across time uses, and unobservable family heterogeneity, through the inclusion of household fixed effects. Importantly, this improved estimation method leads to different results than when applying the methods previously used in the literature. Girls suffer significantly from the absence of their mother with a reduction in time spent in school that is equivalent to dropping out completely. This effect is substantially larger when controlling for household unobservables than when not. Boys increase time spent working on market related activities in response to an absent father, although this time appears to come out of leisure rather than school or doing household chores. Land ownership substantially increase the time boys spend on school activities, whereas renting land reduces the time girls spend on school. Finally, there does not appear to be a substantial trade-off between time spent on school and work, either in the market or at home.

Keywords

Schooling Child labor Philippines Household heterogeneity Joint estimation 

JEL Classification

I2 J16 J22 O15 

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. (1996). Economic aspects of child fostering in Cote D’Ivoire. In T. P. Schultz (Ed.), Research in population economics, Vol. 8 (pp. 25–62). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M., Beegle, K., & Koda, G. (2005). The impact of adult mortality and parental deaths on primary schooling in North-Western Tanzania. Journal of Development Studies, 41(3), 412–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akabayashi, H., & Psacharopoulos, G. (1999). The tradeoff between child labour and human capital formation: A Tanzanian case study. Journal of Development Studies, 35(5), 120–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akresh, R. (2007). School Enrollment Impacts of Non-traditional Household Structure. Mimeo: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  5. Arends-Kuenning, M., & Amin, S. (2004). School incentive programs and children’s activities: The case of Bangladesh. Comparative Education Review, 48(3), 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Assaad, R., Levison, D., & Zibani, N. (2010). The effect of domestic work on girls’ schooling: Evidence from Egypt. Feminist Economics, 16(1), 79–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beegle, K., Dehejia, R., & Gatti, R. (2009). Why should we care about child labor? The education, labor market, and health consequences of child labor. Journal of Human Resources, 44(4), 871–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boozer, M. A., & Suri, T. K. (2001). Child labor and schooling decisions in Ghana. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  9. Cardoso, E., & Souza, A. P. (2004). The impact of cash transfers on child labor and school attendance in Brazil. Working paper No. 04–W07, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  10. Coneus, K., Mühlenweg, A. M., & Stichnoth, H. (2012). Orphans at risk in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence on educational and health outcomes. Review of Economics of the Household. doi:10.1007/s11150-012-9167-4.
  11. de Hoop, J., & Rosati, F. C. (2012). Does promoting school attendance reduce child labour? Evidence from Burkina Faso’s BRIGHT Project. Discussion Paper Series IZA DP No. 6601, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  12. Dumas, C. (2012). Does work impede child learning? The case of Senegal. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 60(4), 773–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edmonds, E. V. (2008). Child labor. In T. P. Schultz & J. A. Strauss (Eds.), Handbook of development economics, Vol. 4, Chap. 57 (pp. 3607–3709). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.Google Scholar
  14. Emerson, P. M., & Souza, A. P. (2011). Is child labor harmful? The impact of working earlier in life on adult earnings. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 59(2), 345–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evenson, R. E. (1978). Symposium on household economics. Philippine household economics: An introduction to the symposium papers. The Philippine Economic Journal, XVII(1 and 2).Google Scholar
  16. Evenson, R. E., Popkin, B. M., & Quizon, E. K. (1980). Nutrition, work, and demographic behaviour in rural philippine households. A synopsis of several Laguna household studies. In H. P. Binswanger, R. E. Evenson, C. A. Florencio, & B. N. F. White (Eds.), Rural household studies in Asia. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gunnarsson, V., Orazem, P. F., & Sánchez, M. A. (2006). Child labor and school achievement in Latin America. World Bank Economic Review, 20(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heady, C. (2003). The effect of child labor on learning achievement. World Development, 31(2), 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho, T. J. (1979). Time costs of child rearing in the rural Philippines. Population and Development Review, 5(4), 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ilahi, N., Orazem, P. F., & Sedlacek, G. (2005). How does working as a child affect wage, income and poverty as an adult?. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No. 0514, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Kazianga, H., Walque, D. D., & Alderman, H. (2009). Educational and health impacts of two school feeding schemes evidence from a randomized trial in rural Burkina Faso. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4976, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. King, E., & Evenson, R. E. (1983). Time allocation and home production in Philippine rural households. In M. Buvinic, M. A. Lycette, & W. P. McGreevey (Eds.), Women and poverty in the third world (pp. 35–61). Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kis-Katos, K. (2012). Gender differences in work-schooling decisions in rural North India. Review of Economics of the Household, 10(4), 491–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kondylis, F., & Manacorda, M. (2012). School proximity and child labor: Evidence from rural Tanzania. Journal of Human Resources, 47(1), 32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levison, D., & Moe, K. S. (1998). Household work as a deterrent to schooling: An analysis of adolescent girls in Peru. Journal of Developing Areas, 32(3), 339–356.Google Scholar
  26. Levison, D., Moe, K. S., & Marie Knaul, F. (2001). Youth education and work in Mexico. World Development, 29(1), 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patrinos, H. A., & Psacharopoulos, G. (1995). Educational performance and child labor in Paraguay. International Journal of Educational Development, 15(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ravallion, M., & Wodon, Q. (2000). Does child labour displace schooling? Evidence on behavioural responses to an enrollment subsidy. The Economic Journal, 110(March), C158–C175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ray, R., & Lancaster, G. (2004). The impact of children’s work on schooling: Multi-country evidence based on SIMPOC Data. Working paper, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.Google Scholar
  30. Rosati, F. C., & Rossi, (2003). Children’s working hours and school enrollment: Evidence from Pakistan and Nicaragua. World Bank Economic Review, 17(2), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Evenson, R. E. (1977). Fertility, schooling, and the economic contribution of children in Rural India: An econometric analysis. Econometrica, 45(5), 1065–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomas, D. (1994). Like father, like son; like mother, like daughter: Parental resources and child height. Journal of Human Resources, 29(4), 950–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zimmerman, F. J. (2003). Cinderella goes to school: The effects of child fostering on school enrollment in South Africa. Journal of Human Resources, 38(3), 557–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Albers School of Business and EconomicsSeattle UniversitySeattleUSA
  2. 2.Center for Studies in Demography and EcologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations