Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 437–457 | Cite as

Labor supply and household meal production among working adults in the Health and Retirement Survey

  • Richard A. Dunn


In this paper, I consider how working adults near retirement age in the United States allocate time and monetary resources to meal production. Using the Consumption and Activities Mail Survey supplement to the Health and Retirement Survey, I use a fixed-effects tobit specification to estimate the effect of hours worked, labor income, non-labor income and assets on meal production decisions for respondents between 45 and 75 years of age who either live alone or with their spouse/partner. These relationships are estimated separately by gender and household structure (single-headed and dual-headed households). Among single males, increasing labor supply by 10 h per week was associated with 33.8 fewer minutes per week allocated to at-home meal preparation, 39.5 fewer minutes per month eating at restaurants, and $6.73 more per week spent on groceries. In contrast, the time and expenditure allocations of single females did not respond to changes in hours worked. Within dual-member households, increasing own-labor supply by 10 h per week was associated with a decrease in time allocated to preparing meals for both the male (30.4 min per week) and female member (30.5 min per week) with only weak evidence that the spouse/partner compensated by increasing their allocation of time.


Household production Labor supply Time use HRS CAMS 

JEL Classification

D12 D13 J22 



The author wishes to thank Barbara Wolfe, John Mullahy, Karl Scholz, Daniel Hamermesh and Mark Aguiar for their valuable input along with seminar participants at Texas A&M University. This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award No. T32 MH18029-21 from the National Institute of Mental Health.


  1. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2005). Consumption versus expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 919–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2007). Lifecycle prices and production. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1533–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, N., Brzozowski, M., & Crossley, T. F. (2006). Measurement errors in recall food consumption data. Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Paper.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, P. M., Butcher, K. F., & Levine, P. B. (2003). Maternal employment and overweight children. Journal of Health Economics, 22(3), 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks, J., Blundell, R., & Tanner, S. (1998). Is there a retirement-savings puzzle? American Economic Review, 88(4), 769–788.Google Scholar
  6. Battistin, E. (2004). Errors in survey reports of consumption expenditures. Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Paper.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bellisle, F., & Dalix, A. M. (2001). Cognitive restraint can be offset by distraction, leading to increased meal intake in women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 74(2), 197–200.Google Scholar
  9. Bellisle, F., Dalix, A. M., & Slama, G. (2004). Non food-related environmental stimuli induce increased meal intake in healthy women: Comparison of television viewing versus listening to a recorded story in laboratory settings. Appetite, 43(2), 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernheim, B. D., Skinner, J., & Weinberg, S. (2001). What accounts for the variation in retirement wealth among U.S. households? American Economic Review, 91(4), 832–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browning, M., Bourguignon, F., Chiappori, P. A., & Lechene, V. (1994). A structural model of intrahousehold allocation. The Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1067–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Browning, M., & Meghir, C. (1991). The effects of male and female labor supply on commodity demands. Econometrica, 59(4), 925–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cawley, J., & Lui, F. (2012). Maternal employment and childhood obesity: A search for mechanisms in time use data. Economics and Human Biology, 10(4), 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Classen, T. J., & Hokayem, C. M. (2005). Childhood influences on youth obesity. Economics and Human Biology, 3(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cogan, J. F. (1981). Fixed costs and labor supply. Econometrica, 49(4), 945–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crossley, T. F., & Lu, Y. (2005). Exploring the returns to scale in food preparation: Baking penny buns at home (No. 05/03). IFS Working Papers, Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).Google Scholar
  17. Davis, G. C. (2013). Food at home production and consumption: Implications for nutrition quality and policy. Review of Economics of the Household, forthcoming. doi: 10.1007/s11150-013-9210-0.
  18. de Castro, J. M. (1990). Social facilitation of duration and size but not rate of the spontaneous meal intake of humans. Physiology & Behavior, 47(6), 1129–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Castro, J. M. (1991). Social facilitation of the spontaneous meal size of humans occurs on both weekdays and weekends. Physiology & Behavior, 49(6), 1289–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Castro, J. M. (1994). Family and friends produce greater social facilitation of food intake than other companions. Physiology & Behavior, 56(3), 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Castro, J. M., & Brewer, E. M. (1992). The amount eaten in meals by humans is a power function in the number of people present. Physiology & Behavior, 51(1), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Castro, J. M., Brewer, E. M., Elmore, D. K., & Orozco, S. (1990). Social facilitation of the spontaneous meal size of humans occurs regardless of time, place, alcohol or snacks. Appetite, 15(2), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dercon, S., & Krishnan, P. (2000). Risk sharing within households in rural Ethiopia. The Journal of Political Economy, 108(4), 688–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Devine, C. M., Connors, M. M., Sobal, J., & Bisogni, C. A. (2003). Sandwiching it in: Spillover of work onto food choices and family roles in low-and moderate-income urban households. Social Science and Medicine, 56(3), 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunn, R. A. (2013). Labor supply and household meal production among working adults in the Health and Retirement Survey. SSRN Working Paper:
  26. Fertig, A., Glomm, G., & Tchernis, R. (2009). The connection between maternal employment and childhood obesity: Inspecting the mechanisms. Review of Economics of the Household, 7(3), 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feunekes, G. I., de Graaf, C., & van Staveren, W. A. (1995). Social facilitation of food intake is mediated by meal duration. Physiology & Behavior, 58(3), 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gan, L., & Vernon, V. (2003). Economies of scale, household size, and the demand for food. The Journal of Political Economy, 111(6), 1361–1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. García, E., Labeaga, J. M., & Ortega, C. (2006). Maternal employment and childhood obesity in Spain. FEDEA Working Paper.Google Scholar
  30. Greene, W. (2004). The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. Econometrics Journal, 7(1), 98–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gronau, R., & Hamermesh, D. S. (2006). Time vs. goods: The value of measuring household production technologies. Review of Income and Wealth, 52(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grossbard-Shechtman, S. (2003). A consumer theory with competitive markets for work in marriage. Journal of Socio-Economics, 31(3), 609–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gurchiek, K. (2006). Lunch hour? More like half-hour, HR Magazine.Google Scholar
  34. Haider, S. J., & Stephens, M, Jr. (2007). Is there a retirement-consumption puzzle? Evidence using subjective retirement expectations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamermesh, D. S. (2007). Time to eat: Household production under increasing income inequality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(4), 852–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hetherington, M. M., Anderson, A. S., Norton, G. N. M., & Newson, L. (2006). Situational effects on meal intake: A comparison of eating alone and eating with others. Physiology & Behavior, 88(4–5), 498–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hurd, M. D., & Rohwedder, S. (2003). The retirement-consumption puzzle: Anticipated and actual declines in spending at retirement. NBER Working Paper No. 9586.Google Scholar
  38. Hurd, M. D., & Rohwedder, S. (2005). The consumption and activities mail survey: Description, data quality and first results on life-cycle spending and saving. typescript, RAND, 2005.Google Scholar
  39. Hurd, M. D., & Rohwedder, S. (2006). Some answers to the retirement-consumption puzzle. NBER Working Paper No. 12057.Google Scholar
  40. Hurd, M. D., & Rohwedder, S. (2008). The retirement consumption puzzle: Actual spending change in panel data. NBER Working Paper No. 13929.Google Scholar
  41. Hurst, E. (2003). Grasshoppers, ants, and pre-retirement wealth: A test of permanent income. NBER Working Paper No. 10098.Google Scholar
  42. Lancaster, T. (2000). The incidental parameters problem since 1948. Journal of Econometrics, 95(2), 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lecocq, S. (2001). The allocation of time and goods in household activities: A test of separability. Journal of Population Economics, 14(4), 585–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luengo‐Prado, M. J., & Sevilla, A. (2013). Time to cook: Expenditure at retirement in Spain. The Economic Journal, 123(569), 764–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miniaci, R., Monfardini, C., & Weber, G. (2003). Is there a retirement consumption puzzle in Italy? (No. 03/14). IFS Working Papers, Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).Google Scholar
  46. Neyman, J., & Scott, E. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica, 16, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Phipps, S. A., Lethbridge, L., & Burton, P. (2006). Long-run consequences of parental paid work hours for child overweight status in Canada. Social Science and Medicine, 62(4), 977–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Redd, M., & de Castro, J. M. (1992). Social facilitation of eating: Effects of social instruction on food intake. Physiology & Behavior, 52(4), 749–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ruhm, C. J. (2004). Parental employment and child cognitive development. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(1), 155–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shide, D. J., & Rolls, B. J. (1991). Social facilitation of caloric intake in humans by friends but not by strangers. International Journal of Obesity, 15, 8.Google Scholar
  51. Sobal, J., & Nelson, M. K. (2003). Commensal eating patterns: A community study. Appetite, 41(2), 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stancanelli, E., & Van Soest, A. (2012). Retirement and time use in couples: A regression discontinuity approach. American Economic Review, Papers & Proceeding, 102, 600–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32(4), 483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations