Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 219–241 | Cite as

Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: a household bargaining approach

Article

Abstract

The goal of this study is to understand how the households decide on portfolio asset allocation when the husband and wife have different risk preferences. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study for 1992–2006, we show that the share of risky assets in portfolios of two-person households increases with the risk tolerance of the spouse who has more bargaining power. The risk tolerance of the spouse who has less bargaining power does not seem to affect the share of household wealth allocated to risky assets. These results are consistent with a cooperative bargaining framework where the investment in risky assets depends on the bargaining power of the more risk tolerant spouse.

Keywords

Portfolio choice Risky assets Household bargaining Risk tolerance Bargaining power 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Shoshana Grossbard, Olivia Mitchell, Robert Pollak, Frances Woolley, Urvi Neelakantan, two anonymous referees, and the participants at the 2010 American Economic Association (AEA) and 2011 American Council on Consumer Interest (ACCI) meetings for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, J., Balduzzi, P., & Sunden, A. (2003). Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401(k) plan. American Economic Review, 93(1), 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ameriks, J., & Zeldes, S. P. (2004). How do household portfolio shares vary with age? TIAA-CREF Working Paper.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, L. R., & Mellor, J. M. (2008). Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference. Journal of Health Economics, 27(5), 1260–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arano, K., Parker, C., & Terry, R. (2010). Gender-based risk aversion and retirement asset allocation. Economic Inquiry, 48(1), 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babiarz, P., Robb, C. A., & Woodyard, A. (2012). Family decision making and resource protection adequacy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bajtelsmit, V. L., & Van Derhei, J. L. (1997). Risk aversion and pension investment choices. In M. S. Gordon, O. S. Mitchell, & M. M. Twinney (Eds.), Positioning pensions for the twenty-first century (pp. 45–66). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 537–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bateman, I., & Munro, A. (2005). An experiment on risky choice amongst households. Economic Journal, 115(502), C176–C189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertaut, C. C., & Haliassos, M. (1997). Precautionary portfolio behavior from a life-cycle perspective. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21(8–9), 1511–1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browning, M. (2000). The saving behaviour of a two-person household. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(2), 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlsson, F., He, H., Martinsson, P., Qin, P., & Sutter, M. (2012). Household decision making in rural China: Using experiments to estimate the influences of spouses. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 84(2), 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charles, K. K., & Hurst, E. (2003). Intergenerational wealth correlations. Journal of Political Economy, 111(6), 1155–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., & Vermeulen, F. (2009). Opening the black box of intrahousehold decision making: Theory and nonparametric empirical tests of general collective consumption models. Journal of Political Economy, 117(6), 1074–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalton, M.A., & Dalton, J.F. (2004). Personal financial planning: Theory and practice. Kaplan Financial.Google Scholar
  16. de Palma, A., Picard, N., & Ziegelmeyer, A. (2011). Individual and couple decision behavior under risk: Evidence on the dynamics of power balance. Theory and Decision, 70(1), 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, R. D. (2008). Health risk and portfolio choice. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 26(4), 472–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedberg, L., & Webb, A. (2006). Determinants and consequences of bargaining power in households. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12367.Google Scholar
  19. Grossbard, S. A. & Pereira, A. M. (2010). Will women save more than men? A theoretical model of savings and marriage. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3146. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1655648.
  20. Guillemette, M., Finke, M. S., & Gilliam, J. E. (2012). Risk tolerance questions to best determine client portfolio allocation preferences. Journal of Financial Planning, 26(5), 34–42.Google Scholar
  21. Hanna, S.D., Guillemette, M., & Finke, M. S. (2013). Assessing risk tolerance. In H. Kent Baker & G. Filbeck (Eds.), Portfolio Theory and Management, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Heeringa, S. G., & Connor, J. (1995). Technical description of the Health and Retirement Study sample design. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan. HRS/AHEAD Documentation Report. Report No: DR-002.Google Scholar
  23. Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Stein, J. C. (2004). Social interaction and stock market participation. Journal of Finance, 59(1), 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (2008). Family financial risk taking when the wife earns more. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(2), 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Juster, F. T., & Suzman, R. (1995). An overview of the health and retirement study. Journal of Human Resources, 30(supplement), S7–S56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kimball, M. S., Sahm, C. R., & Shapiro, M. D. (2008). Imputing risk tolerance from survey responses. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(483), 1028–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kureishi, W., & Wakabayashi, M. (2013). What motivates single women to save? The case of Japan. Review of Economics of the Household, early view. doi:10.1007/s11150-013-9191-z.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, J., & Pocock, M. L. (2007). Intrahousehold allocation of financial resources: Evidence from South Korean individual bank accounts. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lundberg, S. (2005). Gender and household decision-making. XVIII Workshop on Gender and Economics, University of Siena International School of Economic Research, http://www.econ.washington.edu/user/Lundberg/ISER.pdf.
  31. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 988–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundberg, S., Pollak, R. A., & Wales, T. J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom child benefit. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lundberg, S., Startz, R., & Stillman, S. (2003). The retirement-consumption puzzle: A marital bargaining approach. Journal of Public Economics, 87(5–6), 1199–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2008). Planning and financial literacy: How do women fare? American Economic Review, 98(2), 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lusardi, A. & Mitchell, O. S. (2011). Financial literacy and planning: Implications for retirement wellbeing. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 17078.Google Scholar
  36. Mazzocco, M. (2004). Saving, risk sharing, and preferences for risk. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1169–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Neelakantan, U., Lyons, A.C. & Nelson, C. (2009). Household bargaining and portfolio choice. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Available www.aeaweb.org/assa/2009/retrieve.php?pdfid=458.
  38. Poterba, J. M., & Samwick, A. A. (1997). Household portfolio allocation over the life cycle. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6185.Google Scholar
  39. Säve-Söderbergh, J. (2012). Self-directed pensions: Gender, risk, and portfolio choices. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 114(3), 705–728.Google Scholar
  40. Sundén, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88(2), 207–211.Google Scholar
  41. Wong, E. S. (2013). Marital bargaining in the demand for life insurance: Evidence from the health and retirement study. Review of Economics of the Household, early view. doi:10.1007/s11150-013-9193-x.Google Scholar
  42. Yilmazer, T., & Lyons, A. C. (2010). Marriage and the allocation of assets in women’s defined contribution plans. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 31(2), 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human SciencesThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations