Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: a household bargaining approach
- 802 Downloads
The goal of this study is to understand how the households decide on portfolio asset allocation when the husband and wife have different risk preferences. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study for 1992–2006, we show that the share of risky assets in portfolios of two-person households increases with the risk tolerance of the spouse who has more bargaining power. The risk tolerance of the spouse who has less bargaining power does not seem to affect the share of household wealth allocated to risky assets. These results are consistent with a cooperative bargaining framework where the investment in risky assets depends on the bargaining power of the more risk tolerant spouse.
KeywordsPortfolio choice Risky assets Household bargaining Risk tolerance Bargaining power
We would like to thank Shoshana Grossbard, Olivia Mitchell, Robert Pollak, Frances Woolley, Urvi Neelakantan, two anonymous referees, and the participants at the 2010 American Economic Association (AEA) and 2011 American Council on Consumer Interest (ACCI) meetings for their helpful comments.
- Ameriks, J., & Zeldes, S. P. (2004). How do household portfolio shares vary with age? TIAA-CREF Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Bajtelsmit, V. L., & Van Derhei, J. L. (1997). Risk aversion and pension investment choices. In M. S. Gordon, O. S. Mitchell, & M. M. Twinney (Eds.), Positioning pensions for the twenty-first century (pp. 45–66). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Dalton, M.A., & Dalton, J.F. (2004). Personal financial planning: Theory and practice. Kaplan Financial.Google Scholar
- Friedberg, L., & Webb, A. (2006). Determinants and consequences of bargaining power in households. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 12367.Google Scholar
- Grossbard, S. A. & Pereira, A. M. (2010). Will women save more than men? A theoretical model of savings and marriage. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 3146. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1655648.
- Guillemette, M., Finke, M. S., & Gilliam, J. E. (2012). Risk tolerance questions to best determine client portfolio allocation preferences. Journal of Financial Planning, 26(5), 34–42.Google Scholar
- Hanna, S.D., Guillemette, M., & Finke, M. S. (2013). Assessing risk tolerance. In H. Kent Baker & G. Filbeck (Eds.), Portfolio Theory and Management, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Heeringa, S. G., & Connor, J. (1995). Technical description of the Health and Retirement Study sample design. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan. HRS/AHEAD Documentation Report. Report No: DR-002.Google Scholar
- Lundberg, S. (2005). Gender and household decision-making. XVIII Workshop on Gender and Economics, University of Siena International School of Economic Research, http://www.econ.washington.edu/user/Lundberg/ISER.pdf.
- Lusardi, A. & Mitchell, O. S. (2011). Financial literacy and planning: Implications for retirement wellbeing. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 17078.Google Scholar
- Neelakantan, U., Lyons, A.C. & Nelson, C. (2009). Household bargaining and portfolio choice. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Available www.aeaweb.org/assa/2009/retrieve.php?pdfid=458.
- Poterba, J. M., & Samwick, A. A. (1997). Household portfolio allocation over the life cycle. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 6185.Google Scholar
- Säve-Söderbergh, J. (2012). Self-directed pensions: Gender, risk, and portfolio choices. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 114(3), 705–728.Google Scholar
- Sundén, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88(2), 207–211.Google Scholar