Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 613–639 | Cite as

Will daughters walk mom’s talk? The effects of maternal communication about sex on the sexual behavior of female adolescents

  • Susan L. AverettEmail author
  • Sarah M. Estelle
Article

Abstract

Numerous social marketing campaigns exhort parents to talk to their children about sexual abstinence, pregnancy risk, and sexually transmitted disease prevention. The effectiveness of these conversations is difficult to ascertain if parents are more likely to broach discussions related to sexual activity with adolescents who have greater propensities to engage in these risky behaviors. Our baseline empirical results indicate that female adolescents whose mothers communicate more about sex are more likely to have sexual intercourse, practice unsafe sex, and engage in casual sex. However, once we control for the adolescent’s environment and peers through the use of school fixed effects and for the daughter’s own propensity to engage in such behaviors through a rich set of adolescent-specific covariates, the effect of a mother’s talk on her daughter’s behavior is reduced dramatically indicating that mother’s talk is endogenous to the daughter’s sexual behavior. Models employing sister fixed effects to control for family-level unobservables, although imprecisely estimated, confirm this finding.

Keywords

Maternal sex talk Sexual intercourse Unsafe sex Casual sex 

JEL Classification

I13 J12 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Laura Argys, Karen Smith Conway, Jennifer Kohn, David Phillips, Lucie Schmidt and Yang Wang for helpful comments. All errors are our own. This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by Grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from Grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

References

  1. Aizer, A. (2004). Home alone: Supervision after school and child behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1835–1848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, M., & Dwyer, D. (2011). Estimating peer effects in sexual behavior among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amato, P., & Fowler, F. (2002). Parenting practices, child adjustment, and family diversity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 703–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amato, P., & Rivera, F. (1999). Paternal involvement and children’s behavior problems. Journal of Marriage & Family, 61, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Argys, L., Rees, D., Averett, S., & Witoonchart, B. (2006). Birth order and risky adolescent behavior. Economic Inquiry, 44, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Averett, S., Argys, L., & Rees, D. (2011). Older siblings and adolescent risky behavior: Does parenting play a role? Journal of Population Economics, 24, 957–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Averett, S. L., & Wang, Y. (2012). Identification of the effect of depression on risky sexual behavior: Exploiting a natural experiment. The American Economic Review, 102(3), 570–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, E. (2011). To skip the “Talk,” Have an ongoing dialogue. Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204358004577032421571545382.html. Accessed Dec 1, 2011.
  9. Blake, S., Simkin, L., Ledsky, R., Perkins, C., & Calabrese, J. (2001). Effects of a parent-child communications intervention on young adolescents’ risk for early onset of sexual intercourse. Family Planning Perspectives, 33(2), 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Browning, C., Leventha, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2005). Sexual initiation in early adolescence: The nexus of parental and community control. American Sociological Review, 70, 758–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cannonier, C. (2012). State abstinence education programs and teen birth rates in the US. Review of Economics of the Household, 10, 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Centers for Disease Control. (2010). Press release, March 11, 2008. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/stdconference/2008/press/release-11march2008.htm.
  13. Centers for Disease Control. (2011). http://www.cdc.gov/Features/dsTeenPregnancy/. Accessed May 15, 2012.
  14. Finer, L. (2010). Unintended pregnancy among U.S. adolescents: Accounting for sexual activity. Journal of Adolescent Health. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.02.002.
  15. Fletcher, J. (2009). Social interactions and smoking decisions: Evidence using multiple cohorts, instrumental variables, and school fixed effects. Health Economics, 19, 466–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher, J. (2010). Adolescent depression and educational attainment: Results using sibling fixed effects. Health Economics, 19(7), 855–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fletcher, A., Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1995). Parental monitoring and peer influences on adolescent substance use. In J. McCord (Ed.), Coercion and punishment in long-term perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gaviria, A., & Raphael, S. (2001). School-based peer effects on juvenile behavior. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossman, M., Kaestner, R., & Markowitz, S. (2004). Get high and get stupid: The effect of alcohol and marijuana use on teen sexual behavior. Review of Economics of the Household, 2, 413–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton, B., & Ventura, S. (2012). Birth rates for US teenagers reach historic lows for all age and ethnic groups. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief, 89, 1–8.Google Scholar
  21. Kawaguchi, D. (2004). Peer effects on substance use among American teenagers. Journal of Population Economics, 17(2), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Khurana, A., & Cooksey, E. (2012). Examining the effect of maternal sexual communication and adolescent’s perceptions of maternal disapproval on adolescent sexual involvement. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(6), 557–565.Google Scholar
  23. Kohn, J. (2012). What is health? A multiple correspondence health index. Eastern Economic Journal, 38(2), 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Landry, DJ., & Turnbull, W. (1997). Issues in brief: Sexually transmitted diseases hamper development efforts. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/ib_std.html.
  25. Lindberg, L., Santelli, J., & Susheela, S. (2006). Changes in formal sex education: 1995–2002. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(4), 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manlove, J., Ikramullah, E., Mincieli, L., Holcombe, E., & Danish, S. (2009). Trends in sexual experience, contraceptive use, and teenage childbearing: 1992–2002. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44, 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menning, C., Holtzman, M., & Kapinus, C. (2007). Stepfather involvement and adolescents’ disposition toward having sex. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(2), 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murray, M. P. (2006). Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. (2011). http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/costs/pdf/counting-it-up/press-release-national.pdf. Accessed May 16, 2012.
  30. Oettinger, G. (1999). The effects of sex education on teen sexual activity and teen pregnancy. The Journal of Political Economy, 107, 606–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Radloff, Lenore. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Regnerus, M. (2009). Forbidden fruit sex and religion in the lives of American teenagers. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Richardson, J., Radziszewska, B., Dent, C., & Flay, B. (1993). Relationship between after-school care of adolescents and substance use, risk taking, depressed mood, and academic achievement. Pediatrics, 92, 146–148.Google Scholar
  34. Rodgers, J., Rowe, D., & Harris, D. (1992). Sibling differences in adolescent sexual behavior: Inferring process models from family composition patterns. Journal of the Marriage and the Family, 54, 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sabia, J. (2006). Does sex education affect adolescent sexual behaviors and health? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(4), 783–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sabia, J., & Rees, D. (2008). The effect of adolescent virginity status on psychological well-being. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 1368–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sabia, J., & Rees, D. (2011). Boys will be boys: Are there gender differences in the effect of sexual abstinence on schooling? Health Economics, 20(3), 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Santelli, J., Brener, N., Lowry, R., Bhatt, A., & Zabin, L. (1998). Multiple sexual partners among US adolescents and young adults. Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Swain, C., Ackerman, L., & Ackerman, M. (2006). The influence of individual characteristics and contraceptive beliefs on parent-teen sexual communications: A structural model. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 753.e9–753.e18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trenholm, C., Devaney, B., Fortson, K., Clark, M., Quay, L., & Wheeler, J. (2008). Impacts of abstinence education on teen sexual activity, risk of pregnancy, and risk of sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(2), 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vandell, D. L., & Ramanan, J. (1991). Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth: Choices in after-school care and child development. Developmental Psychology, 27, 637–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan, 21(6), 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLafayette CollegeEastonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Management and AccountingHope CollegeHollandUSA

Personalised recommendations