Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 209–235 | Cite as

Gender, added-worker effects, and the 2007–2009 recession: Looking within the household

Article

Abstract

The U.S. recession of 2007–2009 saw unemployment rates for men rise by significantly more than those for women, resulting in the downturn’s characterization as a ‘mancession’. This paper uses data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey to reexamine gender-related dimensions of the 2007–2009 recession. Unlike most previous work, we analyze data that connects men’s and women’s employment status to that of their spouses. A difference-in-difference framework is used to characterize how labor-market outcomes for one spouse varied according to outcomes for the other. Results show that that employment rates of women whose husbands were non-employed rose significantly in the recession, while those for people in other situations held steady or fell—consistent with the view that women took on additional bread-winning responsibilities to make up for lost income. However, probabilities of non-participation did not rise by more for men with working wives than they did for other men, casting doubt on ideas that men in this situation made weaker efforts to return to work because they could count on their wives’ paychecks to support the household.

Keywords

Recession Gender American Community Survey Added-worker effect 

JEL classification

D13 E32 J22 J12 

References

  1. Becker, G., & Ghez, G. (1975). The allocation of time and goods over the life cycle. New York: Columbia University Press for the NBER.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, D., & Branchflower, D. (2011). Young people and the Great Recession. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5674 (April).Google Scholar
  3. Bertaut, C., & Starr-McCluer, M. (2002). Household portfolios in the United States. In L. Guiso, M. Haliassos, & T. Jappelli (Eds.), Household portfolios (pp. 181–217). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bitler, M., & Hoynes, H. (2010). The state of the safety net in the post-welfare reform era. NBER Working Paper No. 16504.Google Scholar
  5. Blundell, R., Chiappori, P.-A., & Meghir, C. (2005). Collective labor supply with children. Journal of Political Economy, 113(6), 1277–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blundell, R., Pistaferri, L., & Saporta-Eksten, I. (2012). Consumption inequality and family labor supply. NBER Working Paper No. 18445.Google Scholar
  7. Bobonis, G. J. (2009). Is the allocation of resources within the household efficient? New evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 117(3), 453–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boushey, H. (2009). Women breadwinners, men unemployed. Center for American Progress (July 20). http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/07/breadwin_women.html.
  9. Breunig, R., & Dasgupta, I. (2005). Do intra-household effects generate the food stamp cash-out puzzle? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(3), 552–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, C., Haltiwanger, J., & Lane, J. (2006). Economic turbulence: Is a volatile economy good for America?. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browning, M., & Crossley, T. (2001). The life-cycle model of consumption and saving. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buitrago, M. & Starr, M. (2013). Gender, race/ethnicity and the 2007–09 recession: Another look within the household. Paper presented at the 2013 annual meetings of the Allied Social Science Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Case, K., Quigley, J., & Shiller, R. (2005). Comparing wealth effects: The stock market versus the housing market. B.E. Press Advances in Macroeconomics, 5(1), Article 1.Google Scholar
  14. Cherchye, L., de Rock, B. & Vermeulen, F. (2010). Married with children: A collective labor supply model with detailed time use and intra-household expenditure information. Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 2010–99.Google Scholar
  15. Congregado, E., Golpe, A. A., & van Stel, A. (2011). Exploring the big jump in the Spanish unemployment rate: Evidence on an ‘added-worker’ effect. Economic Modelling, 28(3), 1099–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Consuelo Colom, M., & Cruz Molés M. (2013). Housing and labor decisions of households. Review of Economics of the Household. doi:10.1007/s11150-012-9165-6.
  17. Cullen, J., & Gruber, J. (2000). Does unemployment insurance crowd out spousal labor supply? Journal of Labor Economics, 18(3), 546–572.Google Scholar
  18. Dickerson Von Lockette, N. (2011). Race and recession: A comparison of the economic impact of the 1980s and 2007–09 recessions on non-college-educated black and white men. In M. Starr (Ed.), Consequences of economic downturn: Beyond the usual economics (pp. 121–138). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Dietz, R., & Haurin, D. (2003). The social and private micro-level consequences of homeownership. Journal of Urban Economics, 54(3), 401–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duflo, E. (2003). Grandmothers and granddaughters: Old-age pensions and intra-household allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review, 17(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duflo, E. & Udry, C. (2004). Intra-household resource allocation in cote d’Ivoire: Social norms, separate accounts, and consumption choices. NBER Working Paper No. 10498.Google Scholar
  22. Engemann, K., & Wall, H. (2010). Effects of recessions across demographic groups. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Review, 92(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  23. Goodman, W., Antczak, S., & Freeman, L. (1993). Women and jobs in recessions: 1969–92. Monthly Labor Review, 116(7), 26–35.Google Scholar
  24. Goss, E., & Phillips, J. (1997). The impact of homeownership on the duration of unemployment. Review of Regional Studies, 27(1), 9–27.Google Scholar
  25. Grown, C. & Tas, E. (2010). Gender equality in the U.S. labor markets in the ‘Great Recession’ of 2007–2010. American University, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 2010–15.Google Scholar
  26. Heckman, J., & MaCurdy, T. (1980). A life cycle model of female labor supply. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hellerstein, J. & Morrill, M. (2011). Booms, busts and divorce. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 11(1), Article 54.Google Scholar
  28. Jacobsen, J. (2007). The economics of gender (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Jappelli, T. (1990). Who is credit constrained in the U.S. economy? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(1), 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Juhn, C. & Potter, S. (2007). Is there still an added-worker effect? Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Report No. 310.Google Scholar
  31. Katz, E. (1997). The intra-household economics of voice and exit. Feminist Economics, 3(3), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kohara, M. (2010). The response of Japanese wives’ labor supply to husbands’ job loss. Journal of Population Economics, 23(4), 1133–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lundberg, S. (1985). The added worker effect. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1), 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mattingly, M., & Smith, K. (2010). Changes in wives’ employment when husbands stop working: A recession-prosperity comparison. Family Relations, 59(4), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Munch, J., Rosholm, M., & Svarer, M. (2006). Are homeowners really more unemployed? Economic Journal, 116(514), 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (2008). Revisiting the differences between the OFHEO and S&P/Case-Shiller House Price Indexes: New explanations. Working paper (January), available at http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/1163/OFHEOSPCS12008.pdf.
  37. Oreffice, S. (2011). Sexual orientation and household decision making: Same-sex couples balance of power and labor supply choices. Labour Economics, 18(2), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rives, J., & Sosin, K. (2002). Occupations and the cyclical behavior of gender unemployment rates. Journal of Socio-Economics, 31(3), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruggles, S., Alexander, J. T., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Schroeder, M. B., & Sobek, M. (2010). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 5.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  40. Sahin, A., Song, J., & Hobijn, B. (2010). The unemployment gender gap during the 2007 recession. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Feb.). Accessed electronically at: http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci16-2.pdf (8/24/2011).
  41. Sierminska, E., & Takhtamanova, Y. (2010). Job flows, demographics and the Great Recession. CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper Series 2010–41, http://www.ceps.lu/pdf/11/art1594.pdf.
  42. Spletzer, J. (1997). Reexamining the added worker effect. Economic Inquiry, 35(2), 417–427.Google Scholar
  43. Stephens, M. (2002). Worker displacement and the added worker effect. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(3), 504–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Starr, M. (2013). Gender and the 2007-09 recession: Looking within the household. American University working paper.Google Scholar
  45. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). American Community Survey: Design and methodology. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  46. Wall, H. J. (2009).The ‘man-cession’ of 2008–2009: It’s big, but it’s not great. The Regional Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Oct.: 4–9. Accessed electronically at: http://stlouisfed.org/publications/pub_assets/pdf/re/2009/d/mancession.pdf.
  47. Ward-Batts, J. (2008). Out of the wallet and into the purse: Using micro data to test income pooling. Journal of Human Resources, 43(2), 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Woytinsky, W. S. (1942). Three aspects of labor dynamics. Washington, DC: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Kreeger Hall 118American UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations