The labor market costs of conflict: closures, foreign workers, and Palestinian employment and earnings

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a lower bound estimate of the labor market costs of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The conflict is quantified by the number of overseas foreign workers in the Israeli labor market and the frequency of temporary closures of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. IV estimates, which exploit a source of exogenous variation in the number of overseas foreign workers, yield significant negative effects of the conflict on Palestinian employment rates in Israel and monthly earnings. Our cost-of-conflict estimates are also relevant for the literature on the economics of immigration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    A notable exception is Angrist and Kugler (2004), who analyze the consequences of a shift in the drug trade (and related violence) on the income of the self-employed and the labor supply of teenage boys in Columbia.

  2. 2.

    Other economic and political consequences of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict are examined in Berman and Laitin (2005), Berrebi and Klor (2005), and Jaeger and Paserman (2005).

  3. 3.

    Borjas (2003) is a notable exception.

  4. 4.

    This includes Palestinians who work in Israeli settlements.

  5. 5.

    The monthly earnings of residents of Gaza that work in Israel were higher than the monthly earnings of residents of the West Bank before September 2000. This could be due to the relatively larger proportion of Gaza residents working in construction as opposed to agriculture prior to 2001 (see Table 3 below).

  6. 6.

    Israel began issuing work permits allowing Palestinians to work in Israel in the early 1970s.

  7. 7.

    Note that residents of Gaza shifted more sharply out of construction and into agriculture and manufacturing than residents of the West Bank starting in 2001. This could partially explain why residents of Gaza experienced a decrease in mean monthly earnings in Israel as opposed to residents of the West Bank (see Table 1).

  8. 8.

    In 2002, in the agricultural sector, most legal foreign workers are from Thailand. In the construction sector, most legal foreign workers are from Romania, the former USSR, China, Turkey, Bulgaria and Thailand. Illegal foreign workers tend to originate from Romania, Philippines, India, Sri Lanka, Burma, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, the former USSR, South America, Africa, Jordan, China, Turkey and Thailand (see www.kavlaoved.org.il/workers/data_en.asp). Unfortunately, these data are not comprehensive enough to be fruitfully included in estimation.

  9. 9.

    The number of Palestinian laborers in Israel falls from a high of 140,000, just prior to the fourth quarter of 2000, to around 50,000 in the fourth quarter of 2004. The mean number of Palestinians in the Israeli labor market over the period is 79,200 with a standard deviation of 39,600.

  10. 10.

    Using ICBS data in the first half of the 1990s Friedberg and Sauer (2003), introduced foreign worker permits as an instrument for overseas foreign workers in studying the effect of foreign workers in Israel on Palestinian labor market outcomes. There are several advantages of our estimates over theirs. First, there were only a negligible number of overseas foreign workers in the early 1990s. Second, PCBS data on the Palestinian economy are widely believed to be much more reliable than ICBS data. The ICBS ceased collecting data on Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1995.

  11. 11.

    Observed proxies for the total demand for foreign workers and Palestinians (such as aggregate Israeli wages or GDP per capita) are not directly included in estimation because they could lead to potentially severe proxy variable biases.

  12. 12.

    Individual fixed effects are not included in Eq. (1) because they are not plausibly correlated with foreign worker supply or closures, which vary at the quarterly level. In addition, estimating with random effects considerably reduces standard errors. Thus, to be conservative, we do not report them (see Miaari and Sauer (2006) for results with individual effects). Other sources of persistence, such as lagged employment status, are not included because of a potentially severe missing data problem—the PLFS sampling frame skips two quarters. Thus, the data limit our ability to examine issues of state-dependence versus unobserved heterogeneity and its effect on the coefficients of interest.

  13. 13.

    Additional specifications show that there are no important nonlinearities in the effect of foreign workers and closures and very few significant interaction terms with background characteristics.

  14. 14.

    As an indication of the sample size problem for Gaza, see Table 1, which shows that less than 3% of Palestinians are employed in Israel in each year after 2001.

References

  1. Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Income distribution, political instability and investment. European Economic Review, 40, 1203–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altonji, J. G., & Card, D. (1991). The effects of immigration on the labor market outcomes of less-skilled natives. In J. M. Abowd & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Immigration, trade, and the labor market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Angrist, J. D. (1992). Wages and employment in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip: 1981–1990. Falk Institute for Economic Research in Israel Discussion Paper No. 92.02, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, July 1992.

  5. Angrist, J. D. (1995). The economic returns to schooling in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. American Economic Review, 85, 1065–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Angrist, J. D. (1996). Short-run demand for Palestinian labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 14, 425–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Angrist, J. D. (1998). The Palestinian labor market between the Gulf War and Autonomy. MIT Department of economics, Working Paper 98-5, May 1998.

  8. Angrist, J. D., & Kugler A. D. (2004). Coca, conflict, and rural income: Evidence from Colombia. unpublished manuscript.

  9. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berman, E., & Laitin, D. D. (2005). Hard targets: Theory and evidence on suicide attacks. NBER Working Paper 11740.

  11. Berrebi, C., & Klor, E. F. (2005). On terrorism and electoral outcomes: Theory and evidence from the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. unpublished manuscript.

  12. Borjas, G. J. (1987). Immigrants, minorities, and labor market competition. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 25, 382–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Borjas, G. J. (2003). The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1335–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Card, D. (1990). The impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 28, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Card, D. (2001). Immigrant inflow, native outflows, and the local labor market impacts of higher immigration. Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 22–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Donald, S. G., & Lang, K. (2007). Inference in difference-in-differences and other panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eckstein, Z., & Tsiddon, D. (2004). Macroeconomic consequences of terror: Theory and the case of Israel. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(5), 971–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedberg, R. M. (2001). The impact of mass migration on the Israeli labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1373–1408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Friedberg, R. M., & Sauer, R. M. (2003). The effects of foreign guest workers in Israel on the labor market outcomes of Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The Maurice Falk Institute for Economic Research in Israel, Discussion Paper No. 03.08.

  20. Jaeger, D. A., & Paserman, D. M. (2005). The cycle of violence? An empirical analysis of fatalities in the Palestinian–Israeli conflict. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1808.

  21. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miaari, S. H., & Sauer, R. M. (2006). The labor market costs of conflict: Closures, foreign workers, and palestinian employment and earnings. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2282.

  23. Pischke, J., & Velling, J. (1997). Employment effects of immigration to Germany: An analysis based on local labor markets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 594–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Venieris, Y. P., & Gupta, D. K. (1986). Income distribution and sociopolitical instability as determinants of savings: A cross-sectional model. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 873–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yashiv, E. (2004). Positive or negative? Migrant workers self selection revisited. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1094.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Robert Sauer gratefully acknowledges the support of the Armand Hammer Fund for Economic Cooperation in the Middle East and the British Academy (grant number SG-43646). We also thank Joshua Angrist, David Genesove, Rachel Friedberg and Corinne Sauer for helpful comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Sauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miaari, S.H., Sauer, R.M. The labor market costs of conflict: closures, foreign workers, and Palestinian employment and earnings. Rev Econ Household 9, 129–148 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-009-9081-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Immigration
  • Foreign workers
  • Closures
  • Employment
  • Earnings
  • Instrumental variables

JEL Classification

  • J21
  • J31
  • J40
  • J61
  • F22
  • C23