Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 159–178 | Cite as

Home production and wages: evidence from the American Time Use Survey

  • Joni HerschEmail author
Article

Abstract

Using data from the American Time Use Survey for the years 2003–2006, this paper finds that housework has a negative relation with wages for both women and men. The negative relation between housework time and wages is not likely to arise from omitted working conditions that are correlated with housework, nor from omitted effort. For women, the negative relation between housework and wages appears in most occupations, including professional and managerial occupations. The connection of housework time to the ‘lack of interest’ argument proposed by defendants in class action sex discrimination cases is examined and is not supported by the evidence.

Keywords

Home production Housework Time use Wage differentials Lack of interest 

JEL Classification

D13 J22 J31 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Shoshana Grossbard, Dan Hamermesh, Amy Nickens, and anonymous referees for helpful suggestions.

References

  1. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2007). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 969–1006. doi: 10.1162/qjec.122.3.969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aliaga, C. (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe? Statistics in focus: Population and social conditions. Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1, part 2), S33–S58. doi: 10.1086/298075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonke, J., Datta Gupta, N., & Smith, N. (2005). The timing and flexibility of housework and men and women’s wages. In D. S. Hamermesh & G. A. Pfann (Eds.), The economics of time use. North Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bryan, M. L., & Sevilla-Sanz, A. (2008). Does housework lower wages and why? Evidence for Britain. ISER working paper 2008–3. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
  6. Coverman, S. (1983). Gender, domestic labor time, and wage inequality. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 623–637. doi: 10.2307/2094923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeman, R. B., & Schettkat, R. (2005). Marketization of household production and the EU-US gap in work. Economic Policy, 20(41), 5–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0327.2005.00132.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossbard-Shechtman, A. (1984). A theory of allocation of time in markets for labor and marriage. The Economic Journal, 94(376), 863–882. doi: 10.2307/2232300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. The Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223–255. doi: 10.1086/259880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamermesh, D. S., Frazis, H., & Stewart, J. (2005). Data watch: The American Time Use Survey. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 221–232. doi: 10.1257/0895330053148029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hersch, J. (1985). Effect of housework on earnings of husbands and wives: Evidence from full-time piece rate workers. Social Science Quarterly, 66(1), 210–217.Google Scholar
  12. Hersch, J. (1991a). The impact of nonmarket work on market wages. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 81(2), 157–160.Google Scholar
  13. Hersch, J. (1991b). Male-female differences in hourly wages: The role of human capital, working conditions, and housework. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44(4), 746–759. doi: 10.2307/2524461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hersch, J., & Stratton, L. S. (1997). Housework, fixed effects, and wages of married workers. The Journal of Human Resources, 32(2), 285–307. doi: 10.2307/146216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hersch, J., & Stratton, L. S. (2002). Housework and wages. The Journal of Human Resources, 37(1), 218–229. doi: 10.2307/3069609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hundley, G. (2000). Male/female earnings differences in self-employment: The effects of marriage, children, and the household division of labor. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(1), 95–114. doi: 10.2307/2696034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Juster, F. T., & Stafford, F. P. (1991). The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(2), 471–522.Google Scholar
  18. Keith, K., & Malone, P. (2005). Housework and the wages of young, middle-aged, and older workers. Contemporary Economic Policy, 23(2), 224–241. doi: 10.1093/cep/byi017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (2007). The American family and family economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 3–21. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.2.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Noonan, M. (2001). The impact of domestic work on men’s and women’s wages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(4), 1134–1145. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01134.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Phipps, S., Burton, P., & Lethbridge, L. (2001). In and out of the labour market: Long term income consequences of child-related interruptions to women’s paid work. The Canadian Journal of Economics (Revue Canadienne d’Economique), 34(2), 411–429. doi: 10.1111/0008-4085.00081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schultz, V. (1990). Telling stories about women and work: Judicial interpretations of sex segregation in the workplace in Title VII cases raising the lack of interest argument. Harvard Law Review, 103(8), 1749–1843. doi: 10.2307/1341317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Selmi, M. (2005). Sex discrimination in the nineties, seventies style: Case studies in the preservation of male workplace norms. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 9(1), 1–50.Google Scholar
  24. Shelton, B. A., & Firestone, J. (1989). Household labor time and the gender gap in earnings. Gender & Society, 3(1), 105–112. doi: 10.1177/089124389003001007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stratton, L. S. (2001). Why does more housework lower women’s wages? Testing hypotheses involving job effort and hours flexibility. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 67–76. doi: 10.1111/0038-4941.00007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vanderbilt Law SchoolNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations