Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 353–384 | Cite as

The effect of family structure on parents’ child care time in the United States and the United Kingdom

  • Charlene M. Kalenkoski
  • David C. Ribar
  • Leslie S. Stratton
Article

Abstract

We use time-diary data from the 2003 and 2004 American Time Use Surveys and the 2000 United Kingdom Time Use Study to estimate the effect of family structure on the time mothers and fathers spend on primary and passive child care and on market work, using a system of correlated Tobit equations. Our results indicate that estimates are sensitive to the inclusion of a common household factor that controls for selection into family type. Estimates from the selection-controlled models indicate that single parents in both countries spend more time in child care than married or cohabiting parents, perhaps in part to compensate for the missing parent, but that there is no difference in the time allocation of married and cohabiting parents. There are substantial cross-country differences, however, as single parents in the U.S. work more than other parents and single parents in the U.K. work less.

Keywords

Time use Child care Family structure 

JEL Classifications

J1 J2 

References

  1. Aldous, Joan, Mulligan, Gail, & Thoroddur, Bjarnason. (1998). Fathering over time: What makes the difference? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 809–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow, Anne, & Probert, Rebecca. (2004). Regulating marriage and cohabitation: Changing family values and policies in Europe and North America—an introductory critique. Law & Policy, 26, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, Gary. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, Gary. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, S33-S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berk, Sarah. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  6. Bianchi, Suzanne. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bianchi, Suzanne, Milkie, Melissa, Sayer, Liana, & Robinson, John (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant, W. Keith, & Zick, Cathleen. (1996). An examination of parent–child shared time. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferree, Myra. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Folbre, Nancy, Yoon, Jayoung, Finnoff, Kade, & Fuligni, Allison Sidle. (2005). By what measure? Family time devoted to children in the United States. Demography, 42, 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gershuny, Jonathan, & Robinson, John. (1988). Historical changes in the household division of labor. Demography, 24, 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grossbard-Shechtman Amyra. (1984). A theory of time in markets for labour and marriage. Economic Journal, 94, 863–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hallberg, Daniel, & Klevmarken, Anders. (2003). Time for children: A study of parent’s time allocation. Journal of Population Economics, 16, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hotz V. Joseph, Klerman, Jacob, & Willis, Robert. (1997). The economics of fertility in developed countries. In Mark Rosenzweig & Oded Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  15. Juster, F. Thomas, & Stafford, Frank. (1985). Time, goods, and well-being. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  16. Juster, F. Thomas, & Stafford, Frank. (1991). The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 471–522.Google Scholar
  17. Kalenkoski, Charlene M., Ribar, David C., & Stratton, Leslie S. (2005). Parental child care in single parent, cohabiting, and married couple families: Time diary evidence from the United Kingdom. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 95, 194–198.Google Scholar
  18. Kimmel, Jean, & Connelly, Rachel. (Forthcoming 2007). “Mothers’ time choices: Caregiving, leisure, home production, and paid work.” Journal of Human Resources.Google Scholar
  19. Kooreman, Peter, & Kapteyn, Arie. (1987). A disaggregated analysis of the allocation of time within the household. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mroz, Thomas. (1999). Discrete factor approximations in simultaneous equation models: Estimating the impact of a dummy endogenous variable on a continuous outcome. Journal of Econometrics, 92, 233–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muller, Chandra. (1995). Maternal employment, parent involvement, and mathematics achievement among adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nock, Steven, & Kingston, Paul. (1988). Time with children: The impact of couples’ work-time commitments. Social Forces, 67, 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson, John. (1985). The validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures. In F. Thomas Juster & Frank Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, John. (2002). The time-diary method: Structure and uses.” In W. Pentland, A. Harvey, M. Powell Lawton, & M. A. McColl (Eds.), Time use research in the social sciences. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Sandberg, John, & Hofferth, Sandra. (2001). “Changes in children’s time with parents, U.S. 1981–1997.” PSC Research Report #01–475.Google Scholar
  26. Seltzer, Judith. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of the Marriage and Family, 66, 921–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smeeding, Timothy, Rainwater, Lee, & Burtless, Gary. (2001). “U.S. poverty in a cross-national context.” In Sheldon Danziger & Robert Haveman (Eds.), Understanding poverty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. South, Scott, & Spitze, Glenna. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walker, Robert, & Wiseman, Michael (Eds.). (2003). The welfare we want? The British challenge for American reform. Bristol, U.K.: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Weiss Yoram. (1997). “The formation and dissolution of families: Why marry? Who marries whom? And what happens upon divorce.” In Mark Rosenzweig & Oded Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  31. West, Candace, & Zimmerman, Don. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Willis, Robert, & Michael, Robert. (1994). Innovation in family formation: Evidence on cohabitation in the United States. In John Ermisch and Neohiro Ogawa (Eds.), The family, the market and the state in ageing societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlene M. Kalenkoski
    • 1
  • David C. Ribar
    • 2
  • Leslie S. Stratton
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsOhio UniversityAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations