Skip to main content
Log in

Disagreement in Australian partners’ reports of financial difficulty

  • Household finances
  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We use unique data in which both partners report about household finances to demonstrate that there is often disagreement about whether the household has experienced financial difficulty in the past year. Four alternative explanations for this disagreement are tested using the data. The results indicate that disagreement may be related to the severity of the underlying material hardship rather than to gender differences or individual (as opposed to household) views of financial difficulty. We find limited evidence that for some couples information asymmetries contribute to explaining disagreement about financial difficulty. This implies that standard surveys which collect information about the household’s financial position from a representative individual may fail to completely characterize the nature of material hardship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauman, K. (1999a). “Extended measures of well-being: Meeting basic needs”, Current Population Reports, Household Economic Studies, P70–67. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census.

  • Bauman, K. (1999b). Shifting family definitions: The effect of cohabitation and other nonfamily household relationships on measures of poverty. Demography, 36(3), 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behreman, J. (1997). Intrahousehold distribution and the family. In M. R. Rozensweig & O. Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. (1997). A survey of theories of the family. In M. R. Rozensweig & O. Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, R. (2001). “Hardship in Australia: An analysis of financial stress indicators in the 1998–99 Australian Bureau of statistics household expenditure survey” Occasional Paper, No. 4, Department of Family and Community Services.

  • Conger, R., Lorenz, F., Elder, G., Simons, R., & Ge, X. (1993). Husband and wife differences in response to undesirable life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelsteen, S., & Kooreman, P. (1997). Financial management, bargaining and efficiency within the household: An empirical analysis. De Economist, 145(3), 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HILDA, (2002). HILDA Survey Annual Report 2002. Melbourne Institute of applied economic and social research, University of Melbourne.

  • Kalugina, E., Radtchenko, N., & Sofer C. (2005). “Using self-reported income in a collective model: within-household income comparisons.” Unpublished working paper.

  • La Cava, G., & Simon, J., (2003). “A tale of two surveys: household debt and financial constraints in Australia”, Research Discussion Paper, 2003–008, Reserve Bank of Australia, July.

  • Layte, R., Maitre, B., Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. (2000). “Explaining levels of deprivation in the European Union”, European panel analysis working paper No. 12, Institute for Social and economic research, University of Essex, Colchester, May 2000.

  • Mayer, S., & Jencks, C. (1989). Poverty and the distribution of material hardship. Journal of Human Resources, XXIV(1), 88–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, J. (1995). His money, her money: Recent research on financial organisation in marriage. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plug, E., & van Praag, B. (1998). Similarity in response behavior between household members: An application for income evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuong, Q. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, N., & Wooden, M. (2002). “The household, income and labour dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey: Wave 1 Survey Methodology”, HILDA Project Technical Paper Series, No. 1/02, May, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.

  • Whelan, C., Layte, R., Maitre, B., & Nolan, B. (2001). “Persistent income poverty and deprivation in the European union: An analysis of the first three waves of the European community household panel”, European Panel Analysis Working Paper No. 17, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, April 2001.

  • Zagorsky, J. (2003). Husbands’ and wives’ view of family finances. Journal of Socio-Economics, 32, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank participants of the Australasian Econometric Society Meetings 2004 and the European Society for Population Economics Meetings 2005, seminar participants at the University of Groningen, and Peter Kooreman for their comments. We have benefited from the comments of the editor and two anonymous referees. All errors remain our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Breunig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breunig, R., Cobb-Clark, D.A., Gong, X. et al. Disagreement in Australian partners’ reports of financial difficulty. Rev Econ Household 5, 59–82 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-007-9005-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-007-9005-2

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation