Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 237–254 | Cite as

The Effect of Child Benefit Policies on Fertility and Female Labor Force Participation in Canada

  • Robert  Mcnown
  • Cristóbal Ridao-cano


This paper presents an analysis of the effects of Canadian child benefit policies on fertility and female labor supply. Canada has adopted a variety of child benefit policies since 1918 that are incorporated into an economic model of fertility. This model is estimated and tested with time series data on fertility, female labor force participation, female wages, male incomes, female education, and child benefits. Cointegration methods are employed to accommodate problems of nonstationarity and endogeneity that characterize time series models of fertility and female labor supply. Two cointegrating relations are found, and these are identified as a fertility relation and a female labor supply function. All economic variables, including child benefits, have statistically significant and appropriately signed coefficients. The estimates are used to evaluate the effects of policy and other economic changes on fertility.


fertility child benefits time series models cointegration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abeysinghe, Tilak 1993“Time Cost, Relative Income, And Fertility In Canada”Journal of Population Economics6189198Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, Roy, Chambers, Marcus 1993“Long Term Demographic Interactions In Precensus England”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A156339362Google Scholar
  3. Beaudry, Paul, Lemieux, Thomas, Parent, Daniel 2000“What is Happening in the Youth Labor Market in Canada”Canadian Public Policy36S59S83Google Scholar
  4. Becker, Gary 1981A Treatise on the FamilyHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Butz, William, Ward, Michael 1979“The Emergence Of Countercyclical Fertility”American Economic Review69318328Google Scholar
  6. Cheung, Yin-Wong, Lai, Kong 1993“Finite-Sample Sizes of Johansen’s Likelihood Ratio Tests for Conintegration”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics551328Google Scholar
  7. Dickey, David, Pantula, Sastry 1987“Determining the Order of Differencing in Autoregressive Processes”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics5455461Google Scholar
  8. Devaney, Barbara 1983“An Analysis Of Variations In US Fertility And Female Labor Force Participation Trends”Demography20147161Google Scholar
  9. Ermisch, John 1988“Econometric Analysis Of Birth Rate Dynamics In Britain”Journal of Human Resources23563576Google Scholar
  10. Gonzalo, Jesus 1994“Five Alternative Methods of Estimating Long-Run Equilibrium Relationships”Journal of Econometrics60203233Google Scholar
  11. Hansen, Hendrik, Juselius, Katerina 1995CATS in RATS: Cointegration Analysis of Time Series.EstimaEvanston, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyatt, Douglas, Milne, William 1991“Countercyclical Fertility in Canada: Some Empirical Results”Canadian Studies in Population18116Google Scholar
  13. Soren, Johansen 1991“Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegrating Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models”Econometrica5915511580Google Scholar
  14. Johansen, Soren, Juselius, Katerina 1994“Identification of the Long-Run and the Short-Run Structure: An Application to the ISLM Model”Journal of Econometrics63736Google Scholar
  15. Johansen, Soren 1995Likelihood Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive ModelsOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansen, Soren 1997“Likelihood Analysis of the I(2) Model”Scandinavian Journal of Statistics24433462Google Scholar
  17. Lehrer, Evelyn, Nerlove, Marc 1986“Female Labor Force Behavior and Fertility in the United States”American Review of Sociology12181204Google Scholar
  18. Macunovich, Diane 1996“Relative Income And Price Of Time: Exploring Their Effects On US Fertility And Female Labor Force Participation”Population and Development Review22(suppl)223257Google Scholar
  19. McNown, Robert. 2003“A Cointegration Model of Age-Specific Fertility and Female Labor Supply in the United States”Southern Economic Journal70344358Google Scholar
  20. McNown, Robert, Rajbhandary, Sameer 2003“Time Series Analysis of Fertility and Female Labor Market Behavior”Journal of Population Economics16501523Google Scholar
  21. Masih, Abul, Masih, Rumi 1999“Is a Significant Socio-Economic Structural Change a Prerequisite of ‘Initial’ Fertility Decline in The LDCs Evidence from Thailand Based on a Multivariate Cointegration/Vector Error Correction Modelling Approach”Journal of Population Economics12463487Google Scholar
  22. Rahbek, Anders, Kongsted, Hans Christian, Jørgensen, Clara 1999“Trend Stationarity in the I(2) Cointegration Model”Journal of Econometrics90265289Google Scholar
  23. Ridao-Cano, Cristobal, McNown, Robert 2003The Effect of Tax-Benefit Policies on Fertility and Labor Force Participation in the United StatesUniversity of ColoradoMimeoGoogle Scholar
  24. Shapiro, Morton 1988“Socio-Economic Effects Of Relative Income And Relative Cohort Size”Social Science Research17362383Google Scholar
  25. Sprague, Alison 1988“Post-War Fertility And Female Labor Force Participation Rates”The Economic Journal98682700Google Scholar
  26. Leslie, Whittington, Alm, James, Peters, H. Elizabeth 1990“Fertility and the Personal Exemption: Implicit Pronatalist Policy in the US”American Economic Review80545556Google Scholar
  27. Willis, Robert 1973“A New Approach To The Economic Theory Of Fertility Behavior”Journal of Political Economy81S14S164Google Scholar
  28. Winegarden, Calman 1984“Women’s Fertility, Market Work And Marital Status: A Test Of The New Household Economics With International Data”Economica51447456Google Scholar
  29. Zhang, Junsen, Quan, Jason, Meerbergen, Peter 1994“The Effect of Tax-Transfer Policies on Fertility in Canada, 1921–88”Journal of Human Resources29181201Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert  Mcnown
    • 1
  • Cristóbal Ridao-cano
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Populations Program, Institute of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of ColorodoBoulder
  2. 2.World BankUSA

Personalised recommendations