Advertisement

Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 174–205 | Cite as

Regulation of non-marketed outputs and substitutable inputs

  • Joachim Bertsch
  • Simeon Hagspiel
Original Article
  • 135 Downloads

Abstract

We study the regulation of a monopolistic firm that provides a non-marketed output based on multiple substitutable inputs. The regulator is able to observe the effectiveness of the provision, but faces information asymmetries with respect to the efficiency of the firm’s activities. Specifically, we consider a setting where one input and the output are observable, while another input and related costs are not. Multi-dimensional information asymmetries are introduced by discrete distributions for the functional form of the marginal rate of substitution between the inputs as well as for the input costs. For this novel setting, we investigate the theoretically optimal Bayesian regulation mechanism. We find that the first-best solution cannot be obtained in case of shadow costs of public funding. The second-best solution implies separation of the most efficient type with first-best input levels, and upwards distorted (potentially bunched) observable input levels for all other types. Moreover, we compare these results to a simpler non-Bayesian approach, i.e., a single pooling contract, and hence, bridge the gap between the academic discussion and regulatory practice. In a numerical simulation, we identify certain conditions in which a single contract non-Bayesian regulation can indeed get close to the second-best solution of the Bayesian menu of contracts regulation.

Keywords

Regulation Asymmetric information Mechanism design Non-marketed goods Substitutable inputs 

JEL Classification

D42 D82 L51 

References

  1. Aguirre, I., & Beitia, A. (2004). Regulating a monopolist with unknown demand: Costly public funds and the value of private information. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 6(5), 693–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, M. (1999). Optimal regulation with unknown demand and cost functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 84, 196–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, M., & Sappington, D. (2007). Chapter 27 recent developments in the theory of regulation. In M. Armstrong & R. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (pp. 1557–1700). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, D. P., & Myerson, R. B. (1982). Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(4), 911–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besanko, D. (1985). On the use of revenue requirement regulation under imperfect regulation (pp. 39–58). Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. Caillaud, B., Guesnerie, R., Rey, P., & Tirole, J. (1988). Government intervention in production and incentives theory: A review of recent contributions. The RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dana, J. D. (1993). The organization and scope of agents: Regulating multiproduct industries. Journal of Economic Theory, 59, 288–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Joskow, P. L. (2014). Incentive regulation in theory and practice: Electric transmission and distribution networks, Chapter 5. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Laffont, J.-J., & Martimort, D. (2002). The theory of incentives—The principial-agent model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, T. R., & Sappington, D. E. (1988a). Regulating a monopolist with unknown demand. The American Economic Review, 78(5), 986–998.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, T. R., & Sappington, D. E. (1988b). Regulating a monopolist with unknown demand and cost functions. The RAND Journal of Economics, 19(3), 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Myerson, R. B. (1979). Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(1), 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Netzentwicklungsplan (2013). Netzentwicklungsplan strom 2013 - zweiter entwurf der Übertragungsnetzbetreiber. 50hertz transmission, amprion, tennet tso, transnetbw.Google Scholar
  15. Sappington, D. (1983). Optimal regulation of a multiproduct monopoly with unknown technological capabilities. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(2), 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schmalensee, R. (1989). Good regulatory regimes. The RAND Journal of Economics, 20(3), 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ewi Energy Research & ScenariosCologneGermany
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  3. 3.ENTSO-EBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations