Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 1–25 | Cite as

Telephony choices and the evolution of cell phones

Original Article

Abstract

Since cell phones were introduced commercially in 1983, virtually all consumers have adopted cell phones. In this paper, we examine the effect of this new product on telephony demand and its evolution in the market using the Consumer Expenditure Survey from 1994 to 2012. This represents a period much longer than previous studies and over which most cell phone adoptions took place. We develop and estimate a model of household choice of telephony options using a mixed logit as a function of consumer characteristics, unobserved alternative-specific attributes, and prices over time. Unlike previous research, our focus is on the evolution of demand and choices made by households. To illustrate the evolution, we construct market segments and track adoptions over time by market segment, allowing for an assessment of whether cell phones are substitutes or complements for landlines. The evidence suggests that the move to cellular telephone services is driven by young households and by households with larger families. We then develop and apply a decomposition of substitutability and find significant evidence that substitutability differs through time and by market segment.

Keywords

Telephone Cellular Landline Consumer adoption Evolution Choice 

Mathematics Subject Classification

L96 D12 

References

  1. Alleman, J., Rappoport, P., & Banerjee, A. (2010). Universal service: A new definition? Telecommunications Policy, 34(1), 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bajari, P., Fox, J. T., & Ryan, S. P. (2008). Evaluating wireless carrier consolidation using semiparametric demand estimation. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 6(4), 299–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BLS. (2008). Consumer expenditure survey user’s documentation. Computer software manual.Google Scholar
  4. Crandall, R. W. (1988). Surprises from telephone deregulation and the AT&T divestiture. American Economic Review, 78(2), 323–327.Google Scholar
  5. Department of Justice. (2008, November). Voice video and broadband: The changing competitive landscape and its impact on consumers. Computer software manual.Google Scholar
  6. Economides, N., Seim, K., & Viard, V. B. (2008). Quantifying the benefits of entry into local phone service. The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(3), 699–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garbacz, C., & Thompson, H. G, Jr. (2003). Estimating telephone demand with state decennial census data from 1970–1990: Update with 2000 data. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 24(3), 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gentzkow, M. (2007). Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: Online newspapers. American Economic Review, 97(3), 713–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gentzoglanis, A., & Henten, A. (2010). Regulation and the evolution of the global telecommunications industry. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gruber, H. (2005). The economics of mobile telecommunications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanson, J. (2007). 24/7: How cell phones and the internet change the way we live, work, and play. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  12. HistoryOfCellPhones.net. (2008). History of cell phones. Retrieved online from http://www.HistoryOfCellPhones.net.
  13. Klemens, G. (2010). The cellphone: The history and technology of the gadget that changed the world. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  14. Macher, J. T., Mayo, J. W., Ukhaneva, O., & Woroch, G. (2013). Demand in a portfoliochoice environment: The evolution of telecommunications. Washington, DC: Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  15. Miravete, E. J. (2002). Estimating demand for local telephone service with asymmetric information and optional calling plans. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(4), 943–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rodini, M., Ward, M. R., & Woroch, G. A. (2003). Going mobile: Substitutability between fixed and mobile access. Telecommunications Policy, 27(5), 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Taylor, W. E., & Ware, H. (2008, December). The effectiveness of mobile wireless service as a competitive constrain on landline pricing: Was the doj wrong. Computer software manual.Google Scholar
  18. Train, K. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Train, K. E., McFadden, D. L., & Ben-Akiva, M. (1987). The demand for local telephone service: A fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices. The RAND Journal of Economics, 18(1), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. US Wireless Connections Surpass Population. (2013). CTIA—The Wireless Association. http://www.ctia.org.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations