Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 183–200 | Cite as

Weak versus strong net neutrality

Original Article


This paper provides a framework to classify and evaluate the impact of net neutrality regulations on the allocation of consumer attention and the distribution of surplus between consumers, ISPs and content providers. While the model provided largely nests other contributions in the literature, here the focus is on including direct payments from consumers to content providers. With this additional price it is demonstrated that the type of net neutrality regulation (i.e., weak versus strong net neutrality) matters for such regulations to have real effects. In addition, we provide support for the notion that strong net neutrality may stimulate content provider investment while the model concludes that there is unlikely to be any negative impact from such regulation on ISP investment. Counter to many claims, it is argued here that ISP competition may not be a substitute for net neutrality regulation in bringing about these effects.


Regulation Net neutrality Internet service providers  Content providers Infrastructure investment 

JEL Classification

L1 D4 L12 L13 C63 D42 D43 


  1. Armstrong, M. (2008). Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S., Carlton, D. W., & Sider, H. S. (2010). Net neutrality and consumer welfare. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 6(3), 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourreau, M., Kourandi, F., Valletti, T.M. (2014). Net neutrality with competing internet platforms. Journal of Industrial Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, H. K., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Guo, H. (2011). The debate on net neutrality: A policy perspective. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi, J. P. (2010). Optimal tariffs and the choice of technology: Discriminatory tariffs versus the ‘Most Favored Nation’ clause. Journal of International Economics, 58, 560–579.Google Scholar
  6. Choi, J. P., Jeon, D. S., & Kim, B. C. (2013). Net neutrality, business models and internet interconnection. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  7. Choi, J. P., Jeon, D.-S., & Kim, B. C. (2014). Asymmetric neutrality regulation and innovation at the edges: Fixed versus mobile networks, mimeo, UNSW.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, J. P., & Kim, B. C. (2010). Net neutrality and investment incentives. RAND Journal of Economics, 41, 446–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Economides, N., & Hermalin, B. (2012). The Economics of network neutrality. RAND Journal of Economics, 43(4), 602–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Economides, N., & Tag, J. (2012). Network neutrality on the Internet: A two-sided market analysis. Information Economics and Policy, 24(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edelman, B. G., & Wright, J. (2014). Price coherence and adverse intermediation, mimeo, Harvard.Google Scholar
  12. Gans, J.S., King, S.P. (2003). The neutrality of interchange fees in payment systems. Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy, 3 (1), Article 1.Google Scholar
  13. Gee, E. (2012). Examining net neutrality regulations for subscription-based content, mimeo, Boston University.Google Scholar
  14. Hermalin, B. E., & Katz, M. L. (2007). The economics of product-line restrictions with an application to the network neutrality debate. Information Economics and Policy, 19, 215–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee, R. S., & Wu, T. (2009). Subsidizing creativity through network design: Zero- pricing and net neutrality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reggiani, C., & Valletti, T. (2011). Net neutrality and innovation at the core and at the edge, mimeo, Imperial.Google Scholar
  17. Wu, T. (2003). Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 2, 141–178.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rotman School of ManagementUniversity of Toronto and NBERTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations