Advertisement

Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 103–119 | Cite as

Understanding the effectiveness of environmental offset policies

  • Robert HahnEmail author
  • Kenneth Richards
Original Article

Abstract

In the real world, taxes and cap-and-trade systems are rarely implemented in their pure form. In this paper, we examine a related approach that has been used widely in practice—which we refer to as an “offset.” The idea behind offsets is to encourage firms or entities that may not be a part of the main regulatory system to produce environmental improvements. These improvements can then be used to offset pollution reduction requirements for regulated entities. This paper analyzes how offsets are used in practice, and identifies key economic and political factors that help explain the use of offsets in certain situations. We find that offsets may often fail to take adequate account of environmental or ecosystem damages. We argue that the effectiveness of an offset policy depends on the political and institutional context in which it is developed.

JEL Classification

Environmental economics (Q5) Law and economics (K) Industrial organization (L) Public economics (H) Microeconomics (D) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Don Carr, Michael Grubb, Dieter Helm, Al McGartland, Axel Michaelowa, Janet Peace, John Palmisano, Ian Parry, Robert Stavins, Tom Tietenberg, Alexander Vasa, David Victor and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions. Emily Giovanni, Tengbo Li, Martin Mattsson, Stephanie Richards, Hemal Shah and Kelley Weddell provided valuable research assistance. The views expressed in this paper reflect those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions with which they are affiliated. 2012 by the authors. All rights reserved.

References

  1. Breetz, H. L., Fisher-Vanden, K., Garson, L., Jacobs, H., Kroetz, K., & Terry, R. (2004). Water quality trading and offset initiatives in the US: A comprehensive survey. Hanover: Dartmouth College.Google Scholar
  2. Bushnell, J. B. (2012). The economics of carbon offsets. In Fullerton & Wolfram (Eds.), The design and implementation of U.S. climate policy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Crocker, T. D. (1966). The economics of air pollution. In H. Wolozin (Ed.), The structuring of atmospheric pollution control systems. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  4. Ellerman, A. D., & Buchner, B. K. (2007). The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, allocation, and early results. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1), 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, J., Winkler, H., Corfee-Morlot, J., & Gagnon-Lebrun, F. (2007). CDM: Taking stock and looking forward. Energy Policy, 35(1), 15–28.Google Scholar
  6. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2008. Water Quality Trading Evaluation: Final Report.Google Scholar
  7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2009. Analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 H.R. 2454 in the 111th Congress.Google Scholar
  8. Fang, F., Easter, W., & Brezonik, P.L. (2005). Point-nonpoint source water quality trading: A case study in the Minnesota River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 645–658.Google Scholar
  9. Goulder, L. H., Parry, I. W. H., Williams, R. C., & Burtraw, D. (1999). The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. Journal of Public Economics, 72, 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grubb, M., Laing, T., Counsell, T., & Catherine, W. (2009) Global carbon mechanisms: Lessons and implications. Climatic Change. DOI:  10.1007/s10584-009-9791-z.
  11. Haddad, B., & Palmisano, J. (2001). Market Darwinism vs. market creationism: Adaptability and fairness in the design of greenhouse gas trading mechanisms. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1, 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hepburn, C. (2007). Carbon trading: A review of the Kyoto mechanisms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoeltje, S. M., & Cole, C. A. (2007). Losing function through wetland mitigation in Central Pennsylvania, USA. Environmental Management, 39, 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hough, P., & Robertson, M. (2009). Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: Where it comes from. What it means. Wetlands Ecological Management, 17, 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keiser & Associates. (2004). Preliminary economic analysis of water quality trading opportunities in the great Miami River Watershed. Ohio: Executive Summary. http://www.envtn.org/uploads/Great-Miami_Trading_Analysis.pdf
  16. Kettlewell, C. I., Bouchard, V., Porej, D., Micacchion, M., Mack, J. J., White, D., et al. (2008). An assessment of wetland impacts and compensatory mitigation in the Cuyahoga River Watershed, Ohio, USA. Wetlands, 28, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kihslinger, R. L. (2008). Success of wetland mitigation projects. National Wetlands Newsletter, 30, 14–16.Google Scholar
  18. King, D.M., & Kuch, P.J. (2003). Will nutrient credit trading ever work? An assessment of supply and demand problems and institutional obstacles. Environmental Law Reporter, 33, 10352–10368.Google Scholar
  19. Liroff, R. A. (1980). Air pollution offsets: Trading, selling and banking. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Matthews, J. W., & Endress, A. G. (2008). Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands. Environmental Management, 41, 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michaelowa, A., & Purohit, P. (2007) Additionality determination of Indian CDM projects: Can Indian CDM project developers outwit the CDM Executive Board? Climate Strategies. Discussion Paper CDM-1.Google Scholar
  22. Millard-Ball, A. (2013). The trouble with voluntary emissions trading: Uncertainty and adverse selection in sectoral crediting programs, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65, 40–55Google Scholar
  23. Montero, J. P. (2000). Optimal design of a phase-in emissions trading program. Journal of Public Economics, 75, 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan, C., & Wolverton, A. (2005). Water Quality Trading in the United States. National Center for Environmental Economics Working Paper #05-07.Google Scholar
  25. Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
  26. Robertson, M. M. (2006). Emerging ecosystem services markets: Trends in a decade of entrepreneurial wetland banking. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schneider, L. (2009). Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: Practical experiences and lessons learned. Climate Policy, 9, 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spieles, D. J. (2005). Vegetation development in created, restored, and enhanced mitigation wetland banks of the United States. Wetlands, 25, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stavins, R. N. (2003). Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. In K. G. Mäler & J. Vincent (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics. vol. 1 (pp. 355–435). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  30. Tietenberg, T., & Lewis, L. (2008). Environmental and natural resource economics (8th ed.). Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  31. UNEP. 2013. The UNEP Risoe Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development. http://cdmpipeline.org/cdm-methodologies.htm-1. Accessed 12 feb 2013.
  32. UNFCCC. 2010. http://cdm.unfccc.int/Statistics/index.html as of November 8, 2010
  33. United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2005). Wetlands Protection: Corps of Engineers Does Not Have an Effective Oversight Approach to Ensure That Compensatory Mitigation is Occurring. Committee of Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives : Report to the Ranking Democratic Member.Google Scholar
  34. Victor, D.G. (2010). The politics and economics of international carbon offsets. In K. J. Holmes (Ed.), Modeling the economics of greenhouse gas mitigation: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wara, M.W. (2008). Measuring the Clean Development Mechanism’s Performance and Potential. UCLA Law Review, 55, 1759–1803. Google Scholar
  36. Wara, M.W. & Victor D.G. (2008). A Realistic Policy on International Carbon Offsets. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development, Working Paper #74.Google Scholar
  37. Woodward, R.T., Kaiser, R.A., & Wicks, A.M.B. (2002). The structure and practice of water quality trading markets. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 967–979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.National University of Singapore Business SchoolSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Maurer School of Law, Indiana UniversityBloomington INUSA

Personalised recommendations