Does industry self-regulation reduce pollution? Responsible Care in the chemical industry
- 731 Downloads
Self-regulation programs, in which industry associations set membership codes beyond government regulations, are prevalent despite scarce evidence on their effectiveness. We examine Responsible Care (RC) in the US chemical manufacturing sub-sector, whose membership codes include pollution prevention, using our author-constructed panel database of 3,278 plants owned by 1,759 firms between 1988 and 2001. We apply two sets of instrumental variables to address a plant’s parent firm’s self-selection into the program, using: (i) the characteristics of other plants belonging to the same firm in our multi-plant sample; and (ii) firm participation in the industry association before the establishment of RC and industry-level RC participation in our full sample. We find that on average, plants owned by RC participating firms raise their toxicity-weighted pollution by 15.9% relative to statistically-equivalent plants owned by non-RC participating firms. This estimated increase is large relative to the yearly 4% reduction in pollution among all plants in our sample between 1988 and 2001. Moreover, RC raises plant-level pollution intensity by 15.1%. These results caution against reliance on self-regulation programs modeled on the pre-2002 RC program that did not require third party certification and in those sectors that lack independent third party certification.
KeywordsCorporate Social Responsibility Self-regulation Voluntary programs Self-selection Greenwash Chemical industry
JEL ClassificationQ53 Q58 L51 L65 D21
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Chemistry Council (ACC) [formerly known as the Chemical Manufacturers’ Association.] (1990). Responsible Care: Codes of management practices. Archived at the International Labor Organization Corporate Codes of Conduct. Retrieved from http://actrav.itcilo.org/actrav-english/telearn/global/ilo/code/responsi.htm.
- American Petroleum Institute (API). (2005). Toxic release inventory burden reduction proposed rule; TRI-2005-0073; RFL-7532-8;70 federal register 57822-57847, October 4. Washington DC: Office of Environmental Information Docket, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Docket ID No. TRI-2005-0073.Google Scholar
- Baron D. P. (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10(v): 7–45Google Scholar
- Cohen, M. A., Gottlieb, M., Linn, J., Richardson, N. (2011). Deepwater drilling: Law, policy, and economics of firm organization and safety. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 10–65.Google Scholar
- Dawson N. L., Segerson K. (2008) Voluntary agreements with industries: Participation incentives with industry-wide targets. Land Economics 84(1): 97–114Google Scholar
- Dlouhy, J. A. (2011). Safety plans could clash, offshore drillers pressured to form watchdog. Houston Chronicle, January 9.Google Scholar
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2007). Green book: The green book nonattainment areas for critical pollutants. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/oar/oaqps/greenbk
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2009). EPA’s risk screening environmental indicators (RSEI), February. Methodology Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.Google Scholar
- General Accounting Office (GAO). (2011). Private fund advisers: Although a self-regulatory organization could supplement sec oversight, it would present challenges and trade-offs. Report to Congressional Committees, GAO-11-623.Google Scholar
- Hamilton J. T. (2005) Regulation through revelation: The origin, politics, and impacts of the toxics release inventory program. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman A. (2000) Competitive environmental strategy: A guide to the changing business landscape. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA). (2008). Responsible Care Status Report 2008. Retrieved from http://www.icca-chem.org/ICCADocs/Status_Report_2008.pdf.
- Lange, I. (2009) Evaluating voluntary measures with treatment spillovers: The case of coal combustion products partnership. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9(1), article 36.Google Scholar
- Levinson, A. (2004). Review of new tools for environmental protection: Education, information, and voluntary measures. In T. Dietz & P. C. Stern (Eds.). March 24. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 171–231.Google Scholar
- Moffet, J., Bregha, F., & Middelkoop, M. J. (2004). Responsible Care: A case study of a voluntary environmental initiative. In K. Webb (Ed.), Voluntary codes: Private governance, the public interest and innovation (pp. 177–208). Ottawa, Canada: Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment.Google Scholar
- Morgenstern, R., & Pizer, W. A. (2007) Reality check: The nature and performance of voluntary environmental programs in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Washington DC: RFF Press.Google Scholar
- National Academy of Engineering; National Research Council. (2010). Interim report on causes of the deepwater horizon oil rig blowout and ways to prevent such events. Committee for the Analysis of Causes of the Deepwater Horizon Explosion, Fire, and Oil Spill to Identify Measures to Prevent Similar Accidents in the FutureGoogle Scholar
- National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling (NCBP). (2011). Deep water: The gulf oil disaster and the future of offshore drilling. Part I: Report to the President, Part II Recommendations.Google Scholar
- Oehlert G. W. (1992) A note on the delta method. The American Statistician 46(1): 27–29Google Scholar
- Pettit, D. (2010). The more things change at MMS .... David Pettit’s blog at the Natural Resources Defense Council, June 14, 2010. Retrieved from http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dpettit/the_more_things_change_at_mms.html.
- Pizer, W. A., Morgenstern, R., & Shih, J.-S. (2011). The Performance of industrial sector voluntary climate programs: Climate wise and 1605 (b). Energy Policy Google Scholar
- Roodman, D. (2008). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in stata. Center for Global Development working paper, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Rosenthal, I., & Kunreuther H. (2010). Roles for third parties in implementing usda food safety and inspection service (FSIS)’s food safety process management programs. Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, The Wharton School of the University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
- Van Asten M., Martinson C. (2005) MON MACT impact. Products Finishing 70(3): 54–59Google Scholar
- Wooldridge J. (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar