Skip to main content

Optimal monitoring of credit-based emissions trading under asymmetric information

Abstract

Project-based emissions trading schemes, like the Clean Development Mechanism, are particularly prone to problems of asymmetric information between project parties and the regulator. In this paper, we extend the general framework on incomplete enforcement of policy instruments to reflect the particularities of credit-based mechanisms. The main focus of the analysis is to determine the regulator’s optimal spot-check frequency given plausible assumptions of incomplete enforcement under asymmetric information on reduction costs and heterogeneous verifiability of projects. We find that, depending on the actual abatement cost and penalty schemes, optimal monitoring for credit-based systems is often discontinuous and significantly differs from the one to be applied for cap-and-trade schemes or environmental taxes. We conclude that, in a real-world context, project admission should ultimately be based on the criterion of verifiability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Cohen M. A. (1999) Monitoring and enforcement of environmental policy, International yearbook of environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer H., Gahvari F. (2002) Imperfect observability of emissions and second-best emission and output taxes. Journal of Public Economics 85(3): 385–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harford J. D. (1978) Firm behavior under imperfectly enforceable pollution standards and taxes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 5(1): 26–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harford J. D. (1987) Self-reporting of pollution and the firm’s behavior under imperfectly enforceable regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14(3): 293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes A. (2000) Implementing environmental regulation: Enforcement and compliance. Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: 107–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes A. G. (1994) Environmental enforcement when inspectability is endogenous: A model with overshooting properties. Environmental and Resource Economics 4: 479–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes A., Kapur S. (2011) Regulatory attitudes and environmental innovation in a model combining internal and external R&D. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61(3): 327–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler A. G. (1991) Noncompliant firms in transferable discharge permit markets: Some extensions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21(2): 180–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macho-Stadler, I. (2006). Environmental regulation: Choice of instruments under imperfect compliance. UFAE and IAE working papers. Unitat de Fonaments de l’Analisi Economica (UAB) and Institut d’Analisi Economica (CSIC).

  • Macho-Stadler I., Perez-Castrillo D. (2006) Optimal enforcement policy and firms’ emissions and compliance with environmental taxes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51(1): 110–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik A. S. (1990) Markets for pollution control when firms are noncompliant. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18(2): 97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohndorf, M. (2010). Optimal monitoring for project-based emissions trading systems under incomplete enforcement. IED working paper 13. Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich.

  • Okubo Y., Hayashi D., Michaelowa A. (2011) NAMA crediting: How to assess offsets from and additionality of policy-based mitigation actions in developing countries. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management 1: 37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo A. (2002) Efficient environmental policy with imperfect compliance. Environmental and Resource Economics 23: 85–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmutzler A., Goulder L. H. (1997) The choice between emission taxes and output taxes under imperfect monitoring. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(1): 51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigman H., Chang H. F. (2011) The effect of allowing pollution offsets with imperfect enforcement. American Economic Review 101: 268–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stranlund J. K. (2007) The regulatory choice of noncompliance in emissions trading programs. Environmental and Resource Economics 38: 99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stranlund J. K., Chavez C. A. (2000) Effective enforcement of a transferable emissions permit system with a self-reporting requirement. Journal of Regulatory Economics 18(2): 113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stranlund J. K., Costello C., Chavez C. A. (2005) Enforcing emissions trading when emissions permits are bankable. Journal of Regulatory Economics 28: 181–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/Risoe. (2010). UNEP Risoe CDM/JI pipeline analysis and database, June 1st 2010. Database and analysis tool. United Nations Environment Programme, RISOE Centre, Denmark. http://cdmpipeline.org/.

  • UNFCCC. (2002). Report of the 7th conference of the parties of the parties to the Kyoto Protocol, Marrakech, UNFCCC/CP/2001/13. United Nations Framework Convention Climate Change, Published 21 January 2002.

  • Wara M. (2007) Is the global carbon market working?. Nature 445: 595–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wara M. (2008) Measuring the clean development mechanism’s performance and potential. UCLA Law Review 55(6): 1759–1803

    Google Scholar 

  • WorldBank. (2011). State and trends of the carbon market 2011. Washington, DC.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian A. MacKenzie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacKenzie, I.A., Ohndorf, M. Optimal monitoring of credit-based emissions trading under asymmetric information. J Regul Econ 42, 180–203 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9196-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9196-1

Keywords

  • Environmental regulation
  • Project-based emissions trading systems
  • Audits and compliance

JEL Classification

  • K32
  • D42
  • D82
  • Q58