Abstract
Empirical cost models for wireline broadband circuits are used to test whether economies of scale exist in rural areas and whether new Ethernet technology lowers the unit cost of broadband transportation. Previous studies have shown small or nonexistent economies of scale for wireless technology. Results from earlier studies also demonstrated economies of scale for voice-only wireline networks which diminished with network size and were fully exploited for large networks. To our knowledge presence of economies of scale for wireline broadband networks has not been tested, certainly not in rural United States. We use data supplied by more than 500 rural local exchange carriers and find economies of scale for small rural wireline broadband providers. Market size limitations appear to prevent rural telephone companies from fully exploiting unit cost savings. The data also show increasing capacity over existing broadband connections is subject to substantial economies of scale, but such economies diminish quickly as bandwidth capacity increases. The data do not support the hypothesis that Ethernet technology reduces broadband transmission cost.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berndt E. (1991) The practice of econometrics: Classic and contemporary. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Caves D. W., Christensen L. R., Tretheway M. W. (1984) Economies of density versus economies of scale: Why trunk and local service airline costs differ. The RAND Journal of Economics 15(4): 471–489
Christensen L. R., Cummings D. C., Schoech P. E. (1983) Econometric estimation of scale economies in telecommunications. In: Courville L., de Fontenay A., Dobell R. (eds) Economic analysis of telecommunications: Theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Christensen, L. R., & Greene, W. H. (1976). Economies of scales in U.S. electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 655–676.
Courville, L., de Fontenay, A., Dobell, R. (eds) (1983) Economic analysis of telecommunications: Theory and applications. North Holland, Amsterdam
Evans, D. S., & Heckman, J. J. (1983). Multiproduct cost function estimates and natural monopoly tests for the bell system. In Breaking up the bell (pp. 253–287). New York: North-Holland.
Evans D.S., Heckman J.J. (1984) A test for subadditivity of the cost function with an application to the bell system. The American Economic Review 74(4): 615–623
Foreman R.D., Beauvais E. (1999) Scale economies in cellular telephony: Size matters. Journal of Regulatory Economics 16: 297–306
Fuss M.A. (1983) A survey of recent results in the analysis of production conditions in telecommunications. In: Courville L., de Fontenay A., Dobell R. (eds) Economic analysis of telecommunications: Theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Glass V. (2000) NECA rural broadband cost study. NECA, Whippany, NJ
Greene W. (2008) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, London
Kiss F., Karabadjian S., Lefebvre B.J. (1983) Economies of scale and scope in bell Canada. In: Courville L., de Fontenay A., Dobell R. (eds) Economic analysis of telecommunications: Theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Maher M.E. (1999) Access costs and entry in the local telecommunications network: A case for de-averaged rates. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17(4): 593–609
McKenzie D.J., Small J.P. (1997) Econometric cost structure for cellular telephony in the United States. Journal of Regulatory Economics 12: 147–157
Shephard R.W. (1970) The theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Shin T.R., Ying J.S. (1992) Natural monopolies in local telephone. Rand Journal of Economics 23(2): 171–183
Sidak, J. G. (2006). Testimony of J. Gregory Sidak. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. United States Senate. Retreived May 25, 2011, http://commerce.senate.gov/pdf/sidak-020706.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glass, V., Stefanova, S.K. Economies of scale for broadband in rural United States. J Regul Econ 41, 100–119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9181-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9181-0