Skip to main content
Log in

New approach to estimating the cost of common equity capital for public utilities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The regulatory process for setting public utilities’ allowed rate of return on common equity has generally used the Gordon DCF, CAPM and Risk Premium specifications to estimate the cost of common equity. Despite the widely known problems with these models, there has been little movement to adopt more recently developed asset pricing models to provide additional evidence for estimating the cost of capital. This paper presents, validates empirically and applies a general yet simple consumption-based asset pricing specification to model the risk-return relationship for stocks and estimate the cost of common equity for public utilities. The model is not necessarily superior to other models in its practical results, yet these results do indicate that it should be used to provide additional estimates of the cost of common equity. Additionally, the model raises doubts as to whether assets such as utility stocks are a consumption (business cycle) hedge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brigham E.F., Shome D.K., Vinson S.R. (1985) The risk premium approach to measuring a utility’s cost of capital. Financial Management 14: 33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J. Y. (1987) Stock returns and the term structure. Journal of Financial Economics 18: 373–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J. Y. (1993) Intertemporal asset pricing without consumption data. American Economic Review 83: 487–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J. Y., Cochrane J. H. (1999) By force of habit: A consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. Journal of Political Economy 107: 205–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane J. H. (2004) Asset pricing, Revised Edition, Princeton. Princeton University Press, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, J. H. (2006). Financial markets and the real economy. NBER Working Paper.

  • Cochrane, J. H. (2007). Portfolio theory. Manuscript. University of Chicago.

  • Engle R. F., Lilein D., Robins R. (1987) Estimation of time varying risk premia in the term structure: The ARCH-M model. Econometrica 55: 391–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EViews©. (2007). Version 6.0. Quantitative Micro Software, LLC.

  • Fama E., French K. (2004) The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18: 25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glosten L. R., Jaganathan R., Runkle D. E. (1993) Relationship between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess returns on stocks. Journal of Finance 48: 1779–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon M. (1974) The cost of capital to a public utility. MSU Public Utility Studies, East Lansing, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. S., Marston, F. C., Mishra, D. R., & O’Brien, T. J. (2003). Ex ante cost of equity estimate of S&P 500 firms: The choice between global and domestic CAPM. Financial Management, 32, 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey C. R. (2001) The specification of conditional expectations. Journal of Empirical Finance 8: 573–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe A. L., Tye W. B. (1990) The Duquense opinion: How much “Hope” is there for investors in regulated firms. Yale Journal on Regulation 8: 113–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanne, M., & Luoto, J. (2007). Robustness of risk-return relationship in the U.S. stock market. Helsinki Center of Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 168.

  • Lanne M., Saikkonen P. (2006) Why is it so difficult to uncover the risk-return tradeoff in stock returns?. Economic Letters 92: 118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R. C. (1973) An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica 41: 867–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelfelder, R. A., & Pilotte, E. A. (2011). Treasury bond risk and return, the implications for the hedging of consumption and lessons for asset pricing. Journal of Economics and Business (forthcoming).

  • Pilotte E., Sterbenz F. (2006) Sharpe and treynor ratios on treasury bonds. Journal of Business 79: 149–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitelaw R. W. (1994) Time-variation and covariations in the expectation and volatility of stock market returns. Journal of Finance 49: 515–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. Michelfelder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahern, P.M., Hanley, F.J. & Michelfelder, R.A. New approach to estimating the cost of common equity capital for public utilities. J Regul Econ 40, 261–278 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9160-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9160-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation