Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Designing environmental policy: lessons from the regulation of mercury emissions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In its waning days, the Clinton administration decided that it was appropriate to regulate mercury emissions from power plants. The incoming Bush administration had to decide how best to regulate these emissions. The Bush administration offered two approaches for regulating mercury emissions from power plants. The first was to establish uniform emission rates across utilities, as mandated by the 1990 Amendments. The second was to establish a cap on mercury emissions while allowing emissions trading in order to reduce the cost of achieving the goal. This paper presents the first cost-benefit analysis of this issue that takes account of IQ benefits. We find that the benefits of the mercury regulation are likely to fall short of the cost. This assessment is based on a number of assumptions that are highly uncertain. The finding of negative net benefits is robust to many, though not all, reasonable variations in the model assumptions. We also find that the emissions trading proposal is roughly $15 billion less expensive than the command-and-control proposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agee M., Crocker T. (1996). Parental altruism and child lead0 exposure: Inferences from the demand for chelation therapy. Journal of Human Resources 31(3): 677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlqwist M., Bengtsson C., Lapidus L., Bergdahl I.A., Shutz A. (1999). Serum mercury concentration in relation to survival, symptoms, and diseases: Results from the prospective population study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 57, 168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound J., Griliches Z., Hall B.H. (1986). Wages, schooling and IQ of brothers and sisters: Do the family factors differ?. International Economic Review 27, 77–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budtz-Jorgensen, E., Debes, F., Weihe, P., & Grandjean, P. (2004). Adverse mercury effects in 7 year-old children expressed as loss in ‘IQ’. Manuscript available: http://www.chef-project.dk/.

  • Cameron S.V., Heckman J.J. (1993). The nonequivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics 11, 1–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington C.D., Cramer G.M., Bolger P.M. (1997). A risk assessment for methylmercury in tuna. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 97, 273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Clean Air Task Force (CATF). EPA Docket ID No. OAR-2002-0056-4910, and EPA Docket ID No. OAR-2002-0056-0338.

  • Crump K.S., Kjellstrom T., Shipp A.M., Silvers A., Stewart A. (1998). Influence of prenatal mercury exposure upon scholastic and psychological test performance: Benchmark analysis of a New Zealand cohort. Risk Analysis 18(6): 701–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dales J. (1968). Pollution program and prices. Toronto, ON: University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1997). Mercury study report to congress. Washington, DC. December

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1999). 1999 National emission inventory documentation and data – Final version 3.0. Washington, DC.

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2001). Water quality criterion for protection of human health: Methylmercury. EPA-823-R-01–001. Washington, DC.

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2003). Integrated risk information system, methylmercury oral reference dose.Washington, DC

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2004). Benefit analysis for the section 112 utility rule. EPA-452/R-03-021. Washington, DC. January.

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2005). Standards of performance for new and existing stationary sources: Electric utility steam generating units. 40 CFR Part, 60, 63, 72, and 75. March.

  • Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). (2004). EPRI comments on EPA proposed emission standards/proposed standards of performance, electric utility steam generating units: Mercury emissions. EPA Docket ID No. OAR-2002-0056-2578, June 16.

  • Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). (2005). EPRI comments on EPA notice of data availability (NODA) regarding a proposed clean air mercury rule (CAMR). January 3.

  • Grandjean P., Weihe P., White R.F., Debes F., Araki S., Yokoyama K., Murata K., Sorensen N., Dahl R., Jorgensen P.J. (1997). Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 19(6): 417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren C.G., Hallmans G., Jansson J.H. (2001). Markers of high fish intake are associated with decreased risk of a first myocardial infarction. British Journal of Nutrition 86(3): 397–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington W., Morgenstern R.D., Nelson P. (2000). On the accuracy of regulatory cost estimates. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19(2): 297–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrabik T.R., Watras C.J. (2002). Recent declines in mercury concentration in a freshwater fishery: The effects of de-acidification and decreased atmospheric mercury deposition. Science of the Total Environment 297, 229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellstrom, T., Kennedy, P., Wallis, S., Stewart, A., Friberg, L., Lind, B., Wutherspoon, T., & Mantell, C. (1989). Physical and mental development of children with prenatal exposure to mercury from fish. stage 2: Interviews and psychological tests at age 6. Report 3642. Solna: National Swedish Environmental Board.

  • Lutter, R. (2000). Valuing children’s health: A reassessment of the benefits of lower lead levels. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. Working Paper 00-2.

  • Lutter R., Irwin E. (2002). Mercury in the environment: A volatile problem. Environment 44(9): 24–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahaffey K.R., Clickner R.P., Bodurow C.C. (2004). Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 and 2000. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(5): 562–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller G.E., Grant P.M., Kishore R., Steinkruger F.J., Rowland F.S., Guinn V.P. (1972). Mercury concentrations in museum specimens of tuna and swordfish. Science 175(26): 1121–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery W.D. (1972). Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory 5(3): 395–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers G.J., Davidson P.W., Cox C., Shamlaye C.F., Palumbo D., Cernichiari E., Sloane-Reeves J., Wilding G.E., Kost J., Huang L., Clarkson T.W. (2003). Prenatal methylmercury exposure from ocean fish consumption in the Seychelles child development study. The Lancet. 361, 1686–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Toxicological effects of methylmercury. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al. (1998). 92-1415. Stipulation for modifiction of settlement agreement. November 17.

  • Neal D.A., Johnson W.R. (1996). The role of premarket factors in black-white wage differences. Journal of Political Economy 104: 869–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northeast states for Coordinated Air use Management (NESCAUM). (February 2005). Economic Valuation of Human health benefits of Controlling Mercury Emissions from U.S. Coal Fired Power Plants.

  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2003). Circular A-4: Regulatory analysis September 17.

  • Oken E., Kleinman K.P., Berland W.E., Simon S.R., Rich-Edwards J.W., Gillman M.W. (2003). Decline in fish consumption among pregnant women after a national mercury advisory. The Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 102(2): 346–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacyna J., Pacyna E., Steenhuisen F., Wilson S. (2003). Mapping 1995 global anthropogenic emissions of mercury. Atmospheric Environment 37(1): 109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts M.J., Spence M. (1976). Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty. Journal of Public Economics 5, 193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salonen J., Seppanen K., Nyyssonen K., Korpela H., Kauhanen J., Kantola M., Tuomilehto J., Esterbauer H., Tatzber F., Salonen R. (1995). Intake of mercury from fish, lipid peroxidation, and the risk of myocardial infarction and coronary, cardiovascular and any death in eastern Finnish men. Circulatio 91(3): 645–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). Sattler.

  • Schwartz, J. (2004). A regulatory analysis of EPA’s proposed rule to reduce mercury emissions from utility boilers, AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. Regulatory Analysis 04-06.

  • Seigneur C., Vijayaraghavan K., Lohman K., Karamchandani P., Scott C. (2004). Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology 38(2): 555–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern A.H., Smith A.E. (2003). An assessment of the cord blood: Maternal blood methylmercury ratio: Implications for risk assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 111(12): 1465–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen A., Briggs P.F. (1967). Old wine in new skins: Grouping Wachsler subtests into new scales. Journal of Consulting Psychology 31, 499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trasande L., Landrigan P.J., Schechter C. (2005). Public health and economic consequences of methylmercury toxicity to the developing brain. Environmental Health Perspectives. 113(5): 590–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayaraghavan K., Lohman K., Chen S.-Y., Karamchanadani P., Seigneur C., Smith A., Jansen J., Levin L. (2004). Sensitivity of mercury atmospheric deposition to anthropogenic emissions in the United States. 7th International conference on mercury as a global pollutant, 27 June–2 July 2004, Ljubljana, Slovenia; RMZ – Materials and Geoenvironment (formerly Rudarsko-metalurski zbornik). Mining and Metallurgy Quarterly 51, 1817–1820

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshizawa K., Rimm D.B., Morris J.S. (2002). Mercury and the risk of coronary heart disease in men. New England Journal of Medicine 347(22): 1755–1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zax J.S., Rees D.I. (2002). IQ, academic performance, environment, and earnings. Review of Economics and Statistics 84(4): 600–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Public Policy Institute, Georgetown University, 3520 Prospect Street, NW, 4th Floor, Washington, D.C., 20007, USA

    Ted Gayer

  2. AEI-Brookings Joint Center, 1150 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20036, USA

    Robert W. Hahn

Authors
  1. Ted Gayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert W. Hahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ted Gayer.

Additional information

Mr. Gayer is associate professor of public policy at Georgetown University and a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. Mr. Hahn is co-founder and executive director of the American Enterprise Institute-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies and a scholar at AEI. We would like to thank Mary Jo Krolewski, Leonard Levin, Joel Schwartz, Anne Smith, Nik Wada, and Chris Whipple for helpful comments and Jordan Connors, Laura Goodman and Molly Wells for valuable research assistance. The views expressed in this paper represent those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gayer, T., Hahn, R.W. Designing environmental policy: lessons from the regulation of mercury emissions. J Regul Econ 30, 291–315 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-9005-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-9005-9

Keywords

Classifications

Search

Navigation