Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 265–281 | Cite as

A New Approach for Regulating Information Markets

Original Article

Abstract

Information markets are markets for contracts that yield payments based on the outcome of an uncertain future event, such as a presidential election. They have the potential to improve decision making and policies throughout the economy. At the same time, there are regulatory hurdles to establish such markets, largely arising from state prohibitions on Internet gambling. This paper reviews the current regulatory structure for information markets in the United States and offers recommendations for reform. We argue that the authority for regulating many information markets should be shifted from the states to the federal government. In addition, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission should administer an “economic purpose test”. That test would only allow information market contracts that are likely to provide significant financial hedging opportunities or valuable information for improving economic decisions.

Keywords

Government policy and regulation Futures pricing 

JEL Classification

G18 G13 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowicz, M. 2004Information markets, administrative decision-making, and predictive cost-benefit analysisUniversity of Chicago Law Review719331015Google Scholar
  2. Acworth, W. (2004). CFTC approves HedgeStreet Exchange. Futures Industry Magazine, March/April.Google Scholar
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics. (1998). Teen Gambling Epidemic Linked to Risky Behavior. August.Google Scholar
  4. Athanasoulis, S., Shiller, R. 2001World Income Components: Measuring and Exploiting Risk-Sharing Opportunities. 91American Economic Review410311054SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  5. Athanasoulis, S., Shiller, R., & van Wincoop, E. (1999). Macro markets and financial security. Federal Reserve Board of New York Economic Policy Review, April.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, T. 2002Gambling for the good, trading for the future: The legality of markets in science claimsChapman Law Review159159180Google Scholar
  7. Berg, J., Nelson, F., Forsythe, R., & Rietz, T. (2003). Results from a dozen years of election futures markets research. Working Paper, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  8. Bingham, A. (2003). Complexity Theory and Pharmaceutical R&D. Credit Suisse First Boston.Google Scholar
  9. Black, B. 2001The legal and institutional preconditions for strong securities marketsUCLA Law Review48781855Google Scholar
  10. Blackwell, D. 1953Equivalent comparison of experimentsAnnals of Mathematical Statistics24265272Google Scholar
  11. CBS News.com. (2004). U.S. to appeal cyber-bet ruling, Lafayette, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  12. Cherry, S.M. (2003). Toward a bettor future. IEE Spectrum Online.Google Scholar
  13. Commodity and Securities Exchanges. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 17, Chapter 1: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.Google Scholar
  14. Commodity Exchange Act. (1974). 7 U.S.C.Google Scholar
  15. Commodity Futures Modernization Act. (2000). Appendix E, Public Law 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763.Google Scholar
  16. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (2002). FY 2003 Annual Performance Report.Google Scholar
  17. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (2004a). The Economic Purpose of Futures Markets.Google Scholar
  18. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. (2004b). FY 2005 President’s Budget and Performance Plan.Google Scholar
  19. Department of Justice. (2000). Jay cohen convicted of operating an off-shore sports betting business that accepted bets from Americans over the internet. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Franklin, C. (2001). Virtual Las Vegas: Regulate or prohibit? Duke Law and Technology Review, 21.Google Scholar
  21. Futures Industry Association. (2004). About FIA.Google Scholar
  22. General Accounting Office. (1997). The commodity exchange act: Legal and regulatory issues remain.Google Scholar
  23. Giles, W. 2004U.S. loses WTO ruling covering online gamblingLas Vegas SunLas VegasGoogle Scholar
  24. Glasner, J. (2002). Election time: What are the odds? Wired News.Google Scholar
  25. Glosten, L., Milgrom, P. 1985Bid, ask, and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed tradersJournal of Financial Economics1471100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldman Sachs Economic Derivatives Market. http://www.gs.com/econderivs.
  27. Gorham, M., & Biswall, B. (2005). The regulatory outlook for event markets: Cool with patches of fog, mimeo.Google Scholar
  28. Gorham, M. (2004). Event markets campaign for respect. Futures Industry Magazine, January/February.Google Scholar
  29. Grinols, E.L., Mustard, D.B. 2001Business profitability vs. social profitability: Evaluating the social contribution of industries with externalities and the case of the casino industryManagerial and Decision Economics22143162Google Scholar
  30. Hahn, R.W., Tetlock, P.C. 2005Using information markets to improve public decision makingHarvard Journal of Law and Public Policy29213289Google Scholar
  31. Hanson, R. (2003). Shall we vote on values, but bet on beliefs? Working Paper. George Mason University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  32. Hedge Street. (2004). Fact Sheet. www.hedgestreet.com.Google Scholar
  33. Hirshleifer, J. 1971The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activityThe American Economic Review61561574Google Scholar
  34. Inman, R., Rubinfeld, D. 1997Rethinking federalismJournal of Economic Perspectives114364Google Scholar
  35. Iowa Electronic Markets. About the Iowa Electronic Markets. http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/about/.
  36. Janower, C.R. (1996). Gambling on the internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(2).Google Scholar
  37. Kezwer, G. 1996Physicians say government-approved love affair with gambling sure bet to cause problemsCanadian Medical Association Journal1636164Google Scholar
  38. Kindt, J.W. 2001The costs of addicted gamblers: Should the states initiate mega-lawsuits similar to the tobacco cases?Managerial and Decision Economics221763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kiviat, B. (2004). The end of management? Time Magazine.Google Scholar
  40. Leach, J.A. (2000). Testimony before the House Committee on banking and financial services.Google Scholar
  41. McCullagh, D. (2003). PayPal settles over gambling transfers. CNET News.Google Scholar
  42. Mussington, D., Wilson, P., Molander, R.C. 1998Exploring Money Laundering Vulnerabilities Through Emerging Cyberspace Technologies: A Caribbean-Based ExerciseRAND CorporationWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Nasaw, D., & McDonald, I. (2004). Street sleuth: Firm offers hedging on a small scale. The Wall Street Journal. Oct. 22.Google Scholar
  44. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. (2003). Draft White Paper. Weather Financial Instruments (Temperature): Insurance or Capital Markets Products? September.Google Scholar
  45. National Gambling Impact Study Commission. (1999). Final Report, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  46. Pennock, D.M., Nielsen, F.A., & Giles, C.L. (2001). Extracting collective probablistic forecasts from web games. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  47. Pethokoukis, J.M. (2004). All seeing all knowing. USNews.com.Google Scholar
  48. Plott, C.R. 2000Markets as information gathering toolsSouthern Economic Journal67215Google Scholar
  49. Raiffa, H. 1968Decision analysisAddison-WesleyReading, MAGoogle Scholar
  50. Richtel, M. (2004a). An industry that dares not meet in the country of its best customers. New York Times.Google Scholar
  51. Richtel, M. (2004b). Web engines plan to end online ads for gambling. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  52. Saum, B. (1999). Testimony before the subcommittee on technology, terrorism, and government information, senate Judiciary.Google Scholar
  53. Sauer, R. 1998The economics of wagering marketsJournal of Economic Literature3620212064Google Scholar
  54. Shaffer, H.J., Hall, M.N. 2002Futures at stake: Youth, gambling, and societyUniversity of Nevada PressReno NevadaGoogle Scholar
  55. Sharpe, W. 1985Investments3Prentice-Hall Inc.Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  56. Shiller, R 2003The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st CenturyPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJGoogle Scholar
  57. Shiller, R., & Schneider, R. (1998). Labor income indices designed for use in contracts promoting income risk management. Review of Income and Wealth, 44(2).Google Scholar
  58. Speyrer, J.F., & Ryan, T.P. (1999). Gambling in Louisiana: A benefit/cost analysis. University of New Orleans.Google Scholar
  59. Sunstein, C.R. (2004). Deliberation and Information Markets. In R.W. Hahn & P.C. Tetlock, (Eds.), Information Markets: A New Way of Making Decisions in the Public and Private Sectors. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies: Washington, DC. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  60. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of the Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  61. The Intercontinental Exchange. http://www.intcx.com/about.html.
  62. United States Senate Republican Policy Committee. (2003). Illegal internet gambling: Problems and solutions. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  63. Wallsten, S. (2003). Congress shorts future terror-fighting innovation. AEI-Brookings Joint Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  64. Winters, K.C., Stinchfield, R.D., Kim, L.G. 1995Monitoring adolescent gambling in MinnesotaJournal of Gambling Studies13179192Google Scholar
  65. Wolfers, J., Zitzewitz, E. 2004Prediction marketsJournal of Economic Perspectives18107126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory studiesWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.McCombs School of BusinessUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations