We develop and apply a new method for estimating the economic benefits of an environmental amenity. The method is based upon the notion of estimating the derived demand for a privately traded option to utilize an open access good. In particular, the demand for state fishing licenses is used to infer the benefits of recreational fishing. Using panel data on state fishing license sales and prices for the continental United States over a 15-year period, combined with data on substitute prices and demographic variables, a license demand function is estimated with instrumental variable procedures to allow for the potential endogeneity of administered prices. The econometric results lead to estimates of the benefits of a fishing license, and subsequently to the expected benefits of a recreational fishing day. In contrast with previous studies, which have utilized travel cost or hypothetical market methods, our approach provides estimates that are directly comparable across geographic areas. Our findings show substantial variation in the value of a recreational fishing day across geographic areas in the United States. This suggests that current practice of using benefits estimates from one part of the country in national or regional analyses may lead to substantial bias in benefits estimates.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
L. G. Anderson (1993) ArticleTitle“Toward a Complete Economic Theory of the Utilization and Management of Recreational Fisheries” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24 272–295 Occurrence Handle10.1006/jeem.1993.1018
G. S. Becker (1965) ArticleTitle“A Theory of the Allocation of Time” Economic Journal 75 493–517
N. E. Bockstael K. E. McConnell (1983) ArticleTitle“Welfare Measurement in the Household Production Framework” American Economic Review 73 806–814
D. Bowes Michael John B. Loomis (1980) ArticleTitle“A Note on the Use of Travel Cost Models with Unequal Zonal Populations” Land Economics 56 IssueID4 465–470
Brown W. G., and F. M. Shalloof. 1984. “Recommended Values for Columbia River Salmon and Steelhead for Current Fishery Management Decisions”. Oregon State University.
W. H. Desvousges F. R. Johnson H. S. Banshaf (1998) Environmental Policy Analysis with Limited Information: Principles and Applications to the Transfer Method Edward Elgar Cheltenham, United Kingdom
P. A. Diamond J. A. Hausman (1994) ArticleTitle“Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 IssueID4 45–64 Occurrence Handle10136765
Dutta, N. 1984. “The Value of Recreational Boating and Fishing in the Central Basin of Ohio′s Portion of Lake Erie”. Ohio State University, Sea Grant Program.
A. M. Freeman (2003) The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods Second Edition. Resources for the Future Washington, D.C.
M. A. Haas S. A. Weithman (1982) ArticleTitle“Socioeconomic Value of the Trout Fishery in Lake Teneycomo, Missouri” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 111 223–230 Occurrence Handle10.1577/1548-8659(1982)111<223:SVOTTF>2.0.CO;2
W. M. Hanemann (1994) ArticleTitle“Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 IssueID4 19–43
M. J. Kealy R. C. Bishop (1986) ArticleTitle“Theoretical and Empirical Specifications Issues in Travel Cost Demand Studies” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 660–667
D. A. King J. G. Hof (1985) ArticleTitle“Experimental Commodity Definition in Recreation Travel Cost Methods” Forest Science 31 519–529
J. Loomis C. Pearce M. Manfredo (2000) ArticleTitle“Using the Demand for Hunting Licenses to Evaluate Contingent Valuation Estimates of Willingness-to-Pay” Applied Economic Letters 7 435–438 Occurrence Handle10.1080/135048500351122
J. B. Loomis C. F. Sorg (1986) ArticleTitle“Economic Value of Idaho Sport Fisheries With an Update on Valuation Techniques” North American Journal of Fisheries Management 6 494–503 Occurrence Handle10.1577/1548-8659(1986)6<494:EVOISF>2.0.CO;2
K. E. McConnell (1992) ArticleTitle“The Problem of Onsite Time in the Demand for Recreation” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74 918–925
J. R. Miller M. J. Hay (1980) ArticleTitle“Estimating Substate Values of Fishing and Hunting” Transactions of the North American Wilderness and Natural Resources Conference 49 345–355
P. R. Portney (1994) ArticleTitle“The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 IssueID4 3–17 Occurrence Handle10136763
J. J. Seneca R. K. Davis (1976) ArticleTitle“A Cross Section Analysis of State Recreation Activity” Journal of Leisure Research 8 88–97
Smith, V. K. 1991. “Household Production Functions and Environmental Benefit Estimation”. Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality, In edited by J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad, New York: North-Holland, pp. 41–76.
Stavins, R. N. 1992. “Private Options to Use Public Goods: The Demand for Fishing Licenses and the Benefits of Recreational Fishing”. Paper presented at Public Economics and Environment Summer Institute, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, August 11–13.
InstitutionalAuthorNameU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1975, 1980, 1985, 1991. National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation, State Overview. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior.
W. J. Vaughan C. S. Russell (1982) Freshwater Recreational Fishing: The National Benefits of Water Pollution Control Resources for the Future Washington, D.C.
R. Walsh (1986) Recreation Economic Decisions Venture Publishing Inc State College, PA
R. Walsh R. Ericson D. Arosteguy M. Hansen (1980) “An Empirical Application of a Model for Estimating the Recreation Value of Instream Flow” Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, Colorado State University Colorado
Whitehead, C. 1983. “State Fish and Wildlife Agency Responses to Funding Challenges”. Wildlife Management Institute, Transactions of 48th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, pp. 139–148.
Wolf, S. A. 1988. “The Sport Fishing Conservation Stamp: A Proposal for Wetland Protection”. A.B. Thesis, Harvard College.
R. Ziemer W. Musser C. Hill (1980) ArticleTitle“Recreation Demand Equations: Functional Form and Consumer Surplus” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 136–141
Financial support of this work was provided by Resources for the Future, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the Dean’s Research Fund, John F. Kennedy School of Government. The analysis benefitted from discussions with Andrew Metrick, Richard Newell, and Kerry Smith, and comments from participants at seminars at the National Bureau of Economic Research and Harvard University, and very helpful comments from two anonymous referees. The data set, which builds upon previous work by Wolf (1988), was assembled with the help of a series of research assistants, including: Rod Bender, Nancy Bilica, Alisha Bloom, Diane Cherry, Peter Condon, Andrew Hoffman, and Michael Susanto. The authors alone are responsible for any errors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bennear, L.S., Stavins, R.N. & Wagner, A.F. Using Revealed Preferences to Infer Environmental Benefits:Evidence from Recreational Fishing Licenses. J Regul Econ 28, 157–179 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-005-3107-7
- revealed-preference valuation
- environmental benefits
- recreational fishing day