Skip to main content
Log in

Mineral Composition and Phase Transformations in the Refractory Lining of the Bottom of Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. Part 2.

  • Published:
Refractories and Industrial Ceramics Aims and scope

Abstract

Specimens of post-service ShA-5-grade chamotte refractory are analyzed for total elemental aluminum and silicon. Products of the electrolysis of cryolitic melt Na (gas), AlF, Al2O, and, possibly, Na2F are shown to diffuse through pores of the carbon refractory bottom lining blocks of an aluminum electrolysis cell. The lower compounds and Na(gas) as they reach the refractory layer enter into a reaction with the refractory material. The Gibbs free energy of hypothetic reactions in the Al - Si - O - F - Na system involving a gas phase has been calculated. It is inferred that the performance characteristics of the ShA-5 refractory fail to meet standard operational requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. V. Sharapova, I. I. Lishchuk, D. Yu. Boguslavskii, and V. V. Chesnyak, “Part 1. Mineral composition and phase transformations in the refractory lining of the bottom of aluminum electrolysis cells,” Novye Ogneupory, No. 3, 13–17 (2005).

  2. D. V. Pruttskov, I. M. Bastryga, T. F. Raichenko, et al., “Phase transformations in the chamotte brick of the base plate of an aluminum electrolysis cell,” Tsvetn. Met., No. 11, 41–43 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. V. Pruttskov, A. B. Bukher, V. P. Pirozhkova, Yu. I. Rys'eva, V. E. Pruttskov, A. P. Khvalin, and S. N. Dotsenko, “A mechanism of failure of the lining of an aluminum electrolysis cell,” Zh. Prikl. Khim., No. 1, 61–66 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. V. Pruttskov, P. I. Titaev, A. A. Andriiko, and V. P. Pirozhkova, “The cryolite-nepheline state diagram and thermodynamic activity of its components,” Ukr. Khim. Zh., 56(5), 470–475 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. N. Kozhevnikov and A. G. Vodop'yanov, The Lower Oxides of Silicon and Aluminum for Electrometallurgy [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. I. Belyaev, “The use of monovalent aluminum in the electrolytic preparation of aluminum,” Tsvetn. Metal., No. 6, 40–44 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. B. Dell, “Aluminum electrolysis,” J. Met., 23(6), 18–20 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Grjjtheim, C. Krohn, M. Malinosry, et al., “Aluminium electrolysis,” in: Aluminium, Verlag, Dusseldorf (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. I. Karyakin, Petrography of Refractories [in Russian], Metallurgizdat, Kharkov (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. I. Efimov, L. P. Belorukova, I. V. Vasil'kova, et al., Properties of Inorganic Compounds. Handbook [in Russian], Khimiya, Leningrad (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. P. Glushko (ed.), Thermal Constants of Materials. Handbook. Vol. 5 [in Russian], AN SSSR, Moscow (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. M. Vetyukov, “Electrometallurgy of Nonferrous Metals,” Trudy LPI, No. 239, 39–56 (1964).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Novye Ogneupory, No. 5, pp. 24 – 26, May, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharapova, V.V., Lishchuk, I.I., Boguslavskii, D.Y. et al. Mineral Composition and Phase Transformations in the Refractory Lining of the Bottom of Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. Part 2.. Refract Ind Ceram 46, 175–176 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11148-005-0078-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11148-005-0078-2

Keywords

Navigation