Skip to main content
Log in

Mineral Composition and Phase Transformations in the Refractory Lining of the Bottom of Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. Part 1.

  • Published:
Refractories and Industrial Ceramics Aims and scope

Abstract

Results for specimens of the refractory lining sampled from the bottom of an aluminum electrolysis cell with a service life of 3.5 years examined by methods of petrography, chemical analysis, and electron probe x-ray microanalysis are reported. The main products of conversion are sodium aluminosilicates, sodium silicates, a glassy phase of variable composition, oxyfluoride glasses, and eutectics. Some of the specimens analyzed are high in β-alumina (20 – 50%). Fluorides are represented by NaF (about 7%), cryolite Na3AlF6 (2 – 5%), malladrite Na2SiF6 (2%), and NaF ⋅ MgF2 (1 – 2%), and the metallic phase, by aluminum (2 – 7%) and ferrosilicon (3 – 10%). The apparent density of the used refractory material is 2.5 – 2.62 g/cm3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. V. Belyaev, G. D. Koz'min, P. V. Polyakov, et al., “Expertise in servicing aluminum electrolysis cells with an alumina heat insulation of the bottom,” Tsvetn. Metallurgiya (Bulletin of the Nonferrous Metallurgy Information Institute), no. 13, 24–26 (1976).

  2. G. D. Koz'min, “Operational behavior of the joints in the bottom of an aluminum electrolysis cell,” Tsvetn. Met., No. 5, 30–32 (1982).

  3. I. M. Bastryga, V. O. Vaisman, V. K. Nikitenko, et al. “Extending the electrolysis cell service life — a route towards the higher effectiveness of aluminum production,” Tsvetn. Met., No. 7, 65 (1986).

  4. G. V. Solonin and G. F. Vedernikov, “Phase transformations of α-alumina in the cathode lining of an aluminum electrolysis cell,” Tsvetn. Met., No. 5, 40–42 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. I. Belyaev, M. B. Rappoport, and L. A. Firsanova, Electrometallurgy of Aluminum [in Russian], Metallurgizdat, Moscow (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. V. Pruttskov, I. M. Bastryga, T. F. Raichenko, et al., “Phase transformations in the chamotte brick of the base plate of an aluminum electrolysis cell,” Tsvetn. Met., No. 11, 41–43 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. I. Karyakin, Petrography of Refractories [in Russian], Kharkov, Metallurgizdat (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Winchell and H. Winchell, The Microscopic Characters of Artificial Inorganic Solid Substances: Optical Properties of Artificial Minerals, Academic Press, New York (1964).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Novye Ogneupory, No. 3, pp. 13 – 17, March, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharapova, V.V., Lishchuk, I.I., Boguslavskii, D.Y. et al. Mineral Composition and Phase Transformations in the Refractory Lining of the Bottom of Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. Part 1.. Refract Ind Ceram 46, 165–169 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11148-005-0076-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11148-005-0076-4

Keywords

Navigation