Skip to main content
Log in

A generalization of option pricing to price-limit markets

  • Published:
Review of Derivatives Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an analytic solution for pricing options in markets with daily price limits. The Black–Scholes model is a nested case in which the daily price limit approaches infinity. Compared to the Black–Scholes model, our solution may solve the mispricing problem and could yield consistent results with existing numerical methods. Practitioners trading options in price-limit markets may resort to the finite difference method or Monte Carlo simulations. However, applying these numerical methods is often time consuming, thereby further illustrating the importance of an analytic solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Normally, the Taiwan Stock Exchange sets its daily price limit for each stock at 7% based on the previous day's closing price of each stock. However, daily price limits have been temporarily adjusted to 3.5% to stabilize stock markets when some unusual events occur, such as the 921 earthquake of 1999, the attacks of September 11, 2001, and the global financial crisis of 2008.

  2. Available online at http://www.futuresindustry.org/downloads/FIMag/mayjune08/May-June_Volume.pdf.

  3. Table 1 of Kim and Yang (2004) presents various price limits in the futures markets of the Chicago Board of Trade, while Table 2 includes a list of price limit regulations from various stock markets around the world. However, the web site of each exchange should be consulted for historical or up-to-date regulations because price limit rules may change over time.

  4. The measure that meets the requirement of \( \tilde{E}\left[ {e^{ - rT} S_{T} |S_{0} } \right] = S_{0} \) is called the risk-neutral measure (see Kou and Wang 2004).

  5. Please refer to Bhattacharya and Waymire (1990) for details of the backward equation.

  6. Note that \( p\left( {t,x,y} \right) \) = \( \hat{p}\left( {t,\hat{x},\hat{y}} \right) \) with the specification of \( x = \hat{x} + L \) and \( y = \hat{y} + L \).

  7. Please refer to Bhattacharya and Waymire (1990) for details of the proof.

  8. Ban et al. (2000) developed their finite difference method according to the partial differential equation and its boundaries expressed in Eq. (2).

  9. Individual stock price volatility is often much higher than that of the stock index. However, the equity market can become much more volatile when unusual events happen. For example, the S&P 500 annual volatility reached more than 130% during the 1987 crash and more than 90% during the 2008 credit crunch.

  10. The authors thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  • Ban, J., Choi, H. I., & Ku, H. (2000). Valuation of European options in the market with daily price limit. Applied Mathematical Finance,7, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R. N., & Waymire, E. C. (1990). Stochastic processes with applications. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy,81, 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, N. F., Cotting, J. C., Kirby, R. G., Opel, J. R., Stein, H. M., Glauber, R. R., et al. (1988). Report of the presidential task force on market mechanisms. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. J. (1986). A theory of price limits in futures markets. Journal of Financial Economics,16, 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, K. M., & Pedersen, H. L. (2005). Predatory trading. Journal of Finance,60, 1825–1863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, P., & Madan, D. B. (1999). Option valuation using the fast Fourier transform. Journal of Computational Finance,2, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C., Chung, H., & Wang, T. I. (2005). Pricing options with price limits and market illiquidity. Research in Finance,22, 187–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, P. H., Lin, M. C., & Yu, M. T. (2003). The effectiveness of coordinating price limits across futures and spot markets. Journal of Futures Markets,23, 577–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie, D., Pan, J., & Singleton, K. (2000). Transform analysis and asset pricing for affine jump-diffusions. Econometrica,68, 1343–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, T. J., & Hwang, C. Y. (1995). Transitory price changes and price-limit rules: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,30, 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J. H., Chang, L. F., & Hung, M. W. (2017). Limit hits and informationally-related stocks. Journal of Financial Markets,34, 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. H., & Swartz, L. M. (2009). Equity derivatives. In R. W. Kolb & J. A. Overdahl (Eds.), Financial derivatives: Pricing and risk management (pp. 103–113). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henke, H., & Voronkova, S. (2005). Price limits on a call auction market: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. International Review of Economics and Finance,14, 439–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P. H., Kim, Y. H., & Yang, J. J. (2009). The magnet effect of price limits: A logit approach. Journal of Empirical Finance,16, 830–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. A., & Limpaphayom, P. (2000). Characteristics of stocks that frequently hit price limits: Empirical evidence from Taiwan and Thailand. Journal of Financial Markets,3, 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. A., Liu, H., & Yang, J. J. (2013). Reconsidering price limit effectiveness. The Journal of Financial Research,36(4), 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. A., & Rhee, S. G. (1997). Price limit performance: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Journal of Finance,52, 885–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. H., Yagüe, J., & Yang, J. J. (2008). Relative performance of trading halts and price limits: Evidence from the Spanish Stock Exchange. International Review of Economics and Finance,17, 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. H., & Yang, J. J. (2004). What makes circuit breakers attractive to financial markets? A survey. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments,13, 109–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. H., & Yang, J. J. (2009). Effect of price limits: Initial public offerings versus seasoned equities. International Review of Finance,9(3), 295–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kou, S. G., & Wang, Hui. (2004). Option pricing under a double exponential jump diffusion model. Management Science,50(9), 1178–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H. E. (1985). Option pricing and replication with transactions costs. Journal of Finance,40, 1283–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Zheng, D., & Chen, J. (2014). Effectiveness, cause and impact of price limit-Evidence from China’s cross-listed stocks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money,29, 217–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phylaktis, K., Kavussanos, M., & Manalis, G. (1999). Price limits and stock market volatility in the Athens Stock Exchange. European Financial Management,5, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, L., & Balakrishnan, N. (2005). Optimal clearing margin, capital and price limits for futures clearinghouses. Journal of Banking & Finance,29, 1611–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia-Hau Guo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, JH., Chang, LF. A generalization of option pricing to price-limit markets. Rev Deriv Res 23, 145–161 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-019-09160-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-019-09160-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation