Skip to main content
Log in

The evaluation of European compound option prices under stochastic volatility using Fourier transform techniques

  • Published:
Review of Derivatives Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compound options are not only sensitive to future movements of the underlying asset price, but also to future changes in volatility levels. Because the Black–Scholes analytical valuation formula for compound options is not able to incorporate the sensitivity to volatility, the aim of this paper is to develop a numerical pricing procedure for this type of option in stochastic volatility models, specifically focusing on the model of Heston. For this, the compound option value is represented as the difference of its exercise probabilities, which depend on three random variables through a complex functional form. Then the joint distribution of these random variables is uniquely determined by their characteristic function and therefore the probabilities can each be expressed as a multiple inverse Fourier transform. Solving the inverse Fourier transform with respect to volatility, we can reduce the pricing problem from three to two dimensions. This reduced dimensionality simplifies the application of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) method developed by Dempster and Hong when transferred to our stochastic volatility framework. After combining their approach with a new extension of the fractional FFT technique for option pricing to the two-dimensional case, it is possible to obtain good approximations to the exercise probabilities. The resulting upper and lower bounds are then compared with other numerical methods such as Monte Carlo simulations and show promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1965). Handbook of mathematical functions (pp. 389–404). National Bureau of Standards, Applied Math. Series 55, Dover Publications.

  • Bailey D., Swarztrauber P. (1991) The fractional Fourier transform and applications. SIAM Review, 33(3): 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barashenkov, I. V., & Oxtoby, O. F. (2007). Moving solitons in the discrete nonlinear Schroedinger equation. Physical Review, E 76.

  • Brenner M., Ou E.Y., Zhang J.E. (2006) Hedging volatility risk. The Journal of Banking and Finance, 30: 811–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr P. (1988) The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities. Journal of Finance 43: 1235–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr P., Madan D. (1999) Option valuation using the fast Fourier transform. Journal of Computational Finance, 2(4): 61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarella, C., Ziogas, A., & Ziveyi, J. (2010). Representation of American option prices under Heston stochastic volatility dynamics using integral transforms. In Contemporary quantitative finance. New York: Springer.

  • Chiarella, C., & Kang, B. (2011). The evaluation of American compound option prices under stochastic volatility and stochastic interest rates. Journal of Computational Finance (To appear).

  • Chourdakis K. (2005) Option pricing using the fractional FFT. Journal of Computational Finance, 8(2): 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Cont, R., & Tankov, P. (2004). Financial modelling with jump processes. Chapman & Hall/CRC Financial Mathematics Series.

  • Dempster, M., & Hong, S. (2000). Spread option valuation and the fast Fourier transform. In H. Geman, D. Madan, & S. R. Pliska (Eds.) Proceedings of the 1st world congress of the Bachelier Finance Society (pp. 203–220). Berlin: Springer.

  • Geske R. (1979) The valuation of compound options. Journal of Financial Economics 7: 63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geske R., Johnson H. E. (1984) The American put option valued analytically. The Journal of Finance 39: 1511–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griebsch S., Wystup U. (2011) On the valuation of fader and discrete barrier options in Heston’s stochastic volatility model. Quantitative Finance, 11(5): 693–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gukhal C. R. (2003) The compound option approach to American options on jump-diffusions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28: 2055–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston S. L. (1993) A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Review of Financial Studies 6: 327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R. (2004) Option pricing by transform methods: Extensions, unification, and error control. Journal of Computational Finance, 7(3): 51–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton A. (2001) Mathematical methods for foreign exchange. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Romberg, J. (2006). Circular convolution and the DFT. http://cnx.org/content/m10786/2.6/.

  • Schilling H. (2002) Foreign exchange risk, Chap.9. Risk Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shephard N.G. (1991) From characteristic function to distribution function: A simple framework for the theory. Econometric Theory, 7(4): 519–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhylyevskyy O. (2010) A fast Fourier transform technique for pricing American options under stochastic volatility. Review of Derivatives Research, 13(1): 1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne A. Griebsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griebsch, S.A. The evaluation of European compound option prices under stochastic volatility using Fourier transform techniques. Rev Deriv Res 16, 135–165 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-012-9083-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-012-9083-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation