Skip to main content
Log in

Two-dimensional risk-neutral valuation relationships for the pricing of options

  • Published:
Review of Derivatives Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Black–Scholes model is based on a one-parameter pricing kernel with constant elasticity. Theoretical and empirical results suggest declining elasticity and, hence, a pricing kernel with at least two parameters. We price European-style options on assets whose probability distributions have two unknown parameters. We assume a pricing kernel which also has two unknown parameters. When certain conditions are met, a two-dimensional risk-neutral valuation relationship exists for the pricing of these options: i.e. the relationship between the price of the option and the prices of the underlying asset and one other option on the asset is the same as it would be under risk neutrality. In this class of models, the price of the underlying asset and that of one other option take the place of the unknown parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ait-Sahalia Y., Lo A.W. (2000). Nonparametric risk management and implied risk aversion. Journal of Econometrics 94, 9–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone-Adesi, G., Engel, R., & Mancini, L. (2004). GARCH Options in Incomplete Markets. Working paper, University of Lugano.

  • Bernardo A.F., Ledoit O. (2000). Gain, loss and asset pricing. Journal of Political Economy 108, 144–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benninga S., Mayshar J. (2000). Heterogeneity and option pricing. Review of Derivatives Research 4, 7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan M.J. (1979). The pricing of contingent claims in discrete time models. Journal of Finance 34, 53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black F., Scholes M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camara A. (1999). An extended set of risk neutral valuation relationships for the pricing of contingent claims. Review of Derivatives Research 3, 67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camara A. (2003). A generalization of the Brennan–Rubinstein approach for the pricing of derivatives. Journal of Finance 58, 805–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camara, A., & Simkins, B. (2006). Options on troubled stock. Working paper, University of Michigan-Flint.

  • Chernov M., Ghysels E. (2000). A study towards a unified approach to the joint estimation of objective and risk-neutral measures for the purpose of options valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 56, 407–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane J. H., Saa-Requejo J. (2000). Beyond arbitrage: Good-deal asset price bounds in incomplete markets. Journal of Political Economy 108, 79–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, C., & Miller, T. W. (2003). The forecast quality of CBOE implied volatility indices. Working paper, Olin School of Business.

  • Cox J., Ross S., Rubinstein M. (1979). Option pricing: A simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics 7(3): 229–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas B., Fleming J., Whaley R. (1998). Implied volatility functions: Empirical tests. Journal of Finance 53(6): 2059–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke G., Stapleton R.C., Subrahmanyam M.G. (1999). When are options overpriced?: The Black–Scholes model and alternative characterisations of the pricing Kernel. European Finance Review 3, 79–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston S.L. (1993). Invisible parameters in option prices. Journal of Finance 48, 933–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackwerth J. (2000). Recovering risk aversion from option prices and realised returns. Review of Financial Studies 13, 433–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackwerth, J. C. (2004). Option-implied risk-neutral distributions and risk aversion Research Foundation of AIMR.

  • Liu, X., Shackleton, M. B., Taylor, S. J., & Xu, X. (2005). Closed-form transformation from risk-neutral to real-world distributions. Working paper, Lancaster University.

  • Pan J. (2002). The jump-risk premia implicit in options: Evidence from an integrated time-series study. Journal of Financial Economics 63, 3–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg J., Engle R. (2002). Empirical pricing kernels. Journal of Financial Economics 64, 341–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan P.J. (2000). Tighter option bounds from multiple exercise prices. Review of Derivatives Research 4(2): 155–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein M. (1976). The valuation of uncertain income streams and the pricing of options. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 7, 407–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein M. (1983). Displaced diffusion option pricing. Journal of Finance 38, 213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder M. (2004). Risk-neutral parameter shifts and derivatives pricing in discrete time. Journal of Finance 59(5): 2375–2401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton R.C., Subrahmanyam M.G. (1984). The valuation of multivariate contingent claims. Journal of Finance 39(1): 207–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Stapleton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franke, G., Huang, J. & Stapleton, R. Two-dimensional risk-neutral valuation relationships for the pricing of options. Rev Deriv Res 9, 213–237 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-007-9009-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-007-9009-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation