Skip to main content

Sea Level Rise and Home Prices: Evidence from Long Island


Global sea level rise is a known consequence of climate change. As predictions of sea level rise have grown in magnitude and certainty, coastal real estate assets face an increasing climate risk. I use a complete data set of repeated home sales from Long Island in New York State to estimate the appreciation discount caused by the threat of sea level rise. The repeat sale methodology allows for time-invariant, unobserved property characteristics to be controlled for. Between 2000 and 2017, I find that residential properties that were exposed to future sea level rise experienced an annual price appreciation rate of roughly 1% point below unexposed properties. I provide numerous robustness checks to confirm this result. I also find evidence of demand spillovers by estimating an appreciation premium for properties that are near the coast but are relatively safe from sea level rise.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Data Availability

Upon request.

Code Availability

Upon request.


  1. Atreya, A., & Czajkowski, J. (2019). Graduated flood risks and property prices in Galveston county. Real Estate Economics, 47(3), 807–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atreya, A., & Ferreira, S. (2015). Seeing is believing? Evidence from property prices in inundated areas. Risk Analysis, 35(5), 828–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakkensen, L. A., & Barrage, L. (2018). Flood risk belief heterogeneity and coastal home price dynamics: Going under water? Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baldauf, M., Garlappi, L., & Yannelis, C. (2020). Does climate change affect real estate prices? Only if you believe in it. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1256–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein, A., Gustafson, M. T., & Lewis, R. (2019). Disaster on the horizon: The price effect of sea level rise. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(2), 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Billings, S. B. (2015). Hedonic amenity valuation and housing renovations. Real Estate Economics, 43(3), 652–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bin, O., & Landry, C. E. (2013). Changes in implicit flood risk premiums: Empirical evidence from the housing market. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65(3), 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bunten, D., & Kahn, M. E. (2017). Optimal real estate capital durability and localized climate change disaster risk. Journal of Housing Economics, 36, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, X., Zhang, X., Church, J. A., Watson, C. S., King, M. A., Monselesan, D., Legresy, B., & Harig, C. (2017). The increasing rate of global mean sea-level rise during 1993–2014. Nature Climate Change, 7(7), 492–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chivers, J., & Flores, N. E. (2002). Market failure in information: The national flood insurance program. Land Economics, 78(4), 515–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Church, J. A., Clark, P. U., Cazenave, A., Gregory, J. M., Jevrejeva, S., Levermann, A., Merrifield, M. A., Milne, G. A., Nerem, R. S., Nunn, P. D., et al. (2013). Sea level change. Technical report. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conroy, S. J., & Milosch, J. L. (2011). An estimation of the coastal premium for residential housing prices in San Diego County. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 42(2), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Desmet, K., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2015). On the spatial economic impact of global warming. Journal of Urban Economics, 88, 16–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eichholtz, P., Steiner, E., & Y¨onder, E. (2019). Where, when, and how do sophisticated investors respond to flood risk? Available at SSRN 3206257.

  15. Gibson, M., & Mullins, J. (2020). Climate risk and beliefs in New York City floodplains. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 7, 1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hino, M., & Burke, M. (2020). Does information about climate risk affect property values? Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Kahn, M. E. (2014). Climate change adaptation: Lessons from urban economics. Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kahn, M. E. (2016). The climate change adaptation literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 166–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kousky, C., Kunreuther, H., LaCour-Little, M., & Wachter, S. (2020). Flood risk and the US housing market. Journal of Housing Research, 29(sup1), S3–S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kousky, C., & Shabman, L. (2014). Pricing flood insurance: How and why the nfip differs from a private insurance company. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kriesel, W., & Landry, C. (2004). Participation in the national flood insurance program: An empirical analysis for coastal properties. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 71(3), 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McCoy, S. J., & Zhao, X. (2018). A city under water: A geospatial analysis of storm damage, changing risk perceptions, and investment in residential housing. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 5(2), 301–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McKenzie, R., & Levendis, J. (2010). Flood hazards and urban housing markets: The effects of Katrina on New Orleans. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 40(1), 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McNamara, D. E., & Keeler, A. (2013). A coupled physical and economic model of the response of coastal real estate to climate risk. Nature Climate Change, 3(6), 559–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Murfin, J., & Spiegel, M. (2020). Is the risk of sea level rise capitalized in residential real estate? The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1217–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nicholls, R. J., & Cazenave, A. (2010). Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science, 328(5985), 1517–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ortega, F., & Taspinar, S. (2018). Rising sea levels and sinking property values: Hurricane Sandy and New York’s housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 106, 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seneviratne, S., Nicholls, N., Easterling, D., Goodess, C., Kanae, S., Kossin, J., Luo, Y., Marengo, J., McInnes, K., Rahimi, M., et al. (2012). Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment.

  29. Severen, C., Costello, C., & Deschenes, O. (2018). A forward-looking ricardian approach: Do land markets capitalize climate change forecasts? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 89, 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sklarz, M., & Miller, N. (2018). The impact of waterfronts on residential home values, part 2: Considering climate change and flood risks.

  31. Votsis, A., & Perrels, A. (2016). Housing prices and the public disclosure of flood risk: A difference-in-differences analysis in finland. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 53(4), 450–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yi, D., & Choi, H. (2019). Housing market response to new flood risk information and the impact on poor tenant. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 61, 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, L., & Leonard, T. (2019). Flood hazards impact on neighborhood house prices. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 58(4), 656–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references



Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Tyndall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Appendix A

In Table 5, I provide results where I limit the sample to properties within 2 km of the coast. In Fig. 9, I provide an elevation map where I indicate which areas of Long Island are within 2 km of the coast. On the south coast, much of this area is at very low elevations, whereas the north coast contains steeper terrain that extends to higher elevations

Fig. 9

Elevation map of the study area. Areas of Nassau and Suffolk counties that are more than 2 km from the coast are shown in black

Appendix B

To generate the sample of properties used in analysis, I drop a number of observations to focus the sample on observations that are most relevant to the research question and fit with the repeat sales methodology. In this Appendix, I provide results using alternative samples to test the robustness of results. Overall, I find results are not generally sensitive to the specific decisions made regarding which observations are dropped.

I limit the sample to only properties that sold multiple times in order to include fixed effects at the property level. If properties that sell frequently are not representative of overall trends in the market the regression results will also not be representative of the overall market. In Table 8, I show results among properties that sold exactly twice, rather than at least two times. If the bias in the repeat sale sample is correlated with sale frequency, this subsample should be more representative of the overall market. I find results on the limited sample are robust and estimates are very close to the full repeat sale sample analysis (Table 2).

The analysis of this paper is focused on the housing market. I exclude other property types, particularly commercial and agriculturally zoned land. These non-housing property types make up 4.4% of transactions. In Table 9, I repeat the main analysis but include these other property types. I find results are very similar to the main estimates of the paper.

Table 8 Effect of sea level exposure on price appreciation, only properties that sold exactly twice
Table 9 Effect of sea level exposure on price appreciation, all property types

Appendix C

Table 10 provides split sample results where the effect of exposure is estimated separately for properties on the North and South sides of the study area. I split the sample area with a line that runs equidistant from the north and south coasts.

I find that the significant negative price effect of exposure is driven by properties on the south coast. In fact, I find a marginally significant positive price effect for exposure on the north coast (column 1). Because hurricane activity approaches from the south, the north coast is largely protected from storm surge events. The marginally positive price effect could be evidence of demand substitution towards coastal properties that are considered to be relatively low risk

Table 10 Effect of sea level exposure on price appreciation, north coast vs south coast

Appendix D

In Table 11, I provide a horse-race regression where I include the elevation based at risk definition simultaneously with the FEMA flood zone definition. Across the three regressions, I find that all six coefficients are negative, though not all are statistically significant. The result suggests that conditional on elevation, homes within FEMA defined flood zones appreciated less quickly. Also, the result suggests that conditional on being in a flood zone, lower elevation properties suffered a greater price penalty. The two risk indicators are highly correlated, potentially leading to multicollinearity issues. Therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution

Table 11 Effect of sea level exposure on price appreciation, impact of elevation vs flood zone

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tyndall, J. Sea Level Rise and Home Prices: Evidence from Long Island. J Real Estate Finan Econ (2021).

Download citation


  • Housing markets
  • Climate change
  • Sea level
  • Flooding

JEL Classification

  • G10
  • R30
  • Q54